Does passmark include turbo frequencies?

[Kyzer]

( cpubenchmark.net )

i5-6600 3.3 7,576
i5-4590 3.5 7,213
i5-4460 3.2 6,628
i5-6400 2.7 6,534

 

Is this including turbo frequencies or only base frequencies?

 

I find it hard to believe 6400 at 2.7 gets only a slightly lower score 4460 at 3.2... Skylake was not that much of an improvement... (as seen by 4590/6600)

[Curufinwe_wins]

( cpubenchmark.net )

i5-6600 3.3 7,576

i5-4590 3.5 7,213

i5-4460 3.2 6,628

i5-6400 2.7 6,534

 

Is this including turbo frequencies or only base frequencies?

 

I find it hard to believe 6400 at 2.7 gets only a slightly lower score 4460 at 3.2... Skylake was not that much of an improvement... (as seen by 4590/6600)

So most of those have the properly listed turbos, but the 6400 actually has a 3.0? 4 core turbo.

[Kyzer]

So most of those have the properly listed turbos, but the 6400 actually has a 3.0? 4 core turbo.

Oops, I meant to type 4690. Not 4590.

 

6400 has a 3.3 turbo, but its 3.1 for all cores (I think)

I mean, it's GOT to include turbos. Looking at the i5-6600 (which turbos to 3.9) and the i5-4690 (which turbos to 3.9) there's a 300 point difference.

 

Looking at the i5-6400, which turbos to 3.1, and the i5-4460, which turbos to 3.4 (likely 3.3), the 6400 gets 6,534 and the 4460 gets 6,628.

 

So for Skylake, there seems to be a 200MHz gap over Haswell? (3.2 will perform same as 3.4 Haswell?)

[Curufinwe_wins]

Oops, I meant to type 4690. Not 4590.

 

6400 has a 3.3 turbo, but its 3.1 for all cores (I think)

I mean, it's GOT to include turbos. Looking at the i5-6600 (which turbos to 3.9) and the i5-4690 (which turbos to 3.9) there's a 300 point difference.

 

Looking at the i5-6400, which turbos to 3.1, and the i5-4460, which turbos to 3.4, the 6400 gets 6,534 and the 4460 gets 6,628.

 

So for Skylake, there seems to be a 200MHz gap over Haswell? (3.2 will perform same as 3.4 Haswell?)

The 4460 doesn't hit 3.4 on all cores, it hits 3.2 if I remember right. I don't use that benchmark, but I don't know if it is single threaded or multithreaded. Just check out r15 scores...

 

But yea, 200 Mhz sounds fairly reasonable. There are some instruction sets with literally 0 improvement and others with up to 15% improvement, but the average seemed somewhere around 7-9% (which shows how little improvement over broadwell ipc skylake is...)

[Kyzer]

The 4460 doesn't hit 3.4 on all cores, it hits 3.2 if I remember right. I don't use that benchmark, but I don't know if it is single threaded or multithreaded. Just check out r15 scores...

 

But yea, 200 Mhz sounds fairly reasonable. There are some instruction sets with literally 0 improvement and others with up to 15% improvement, but the average seemed somewhere around 7-9% (which shows how little improvement over broadwell ipc skylake is...)

3.2 is base clock for 4460

 

 

edit;

r15 doesn't include skylake

lmao

[Curufinwe_wins]

3.2 is base clock for 4460

 

 

edit;

r15 doesn't include skylake

lmao

We have a few submissions on the forums for it. (plus reviews exist with r15 used ofc.)

 

Here is the link for our forums r15 spreadsheet:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sxzGshuqVtFe_2zgRhN3gXCraR7d8p-NazJ6z0nsGGc/edit#gid=1868502473