lagittaja

For the Cinema Edition, follow up video: madVR

For the Cinema Edition, follow up video: madVR

For the Cinema Edition, follow up video: madVR

For the Cinema Edition, follow up video: madVR

Good video.
But there's a "big" flaw in the comparison. That being the "huge" Intel stock cooler you used.
This is what you get nowadays

 
Not this

Good video.
But there's a "big" flaw in the comparison. That being the "huge" Intel stock cooler you used.
This is what you get nowadays

 
Not this

Good video.
But there's a "big" flaw in the comparison. That being the "huge" Intel stock cooler you used.
This is what you get nowadays

 
Not this

Good video.
But there's a "big" flaw in the comparison. That being the "huge" Intel stock cooler you used.
This is what you get nowadays

 
Not this

Good video.
But there's a "big" flaw in the comparison. That being the "huge" Intel stock cooler you used.
This is what you get nowadays

 
Not this

Good video.
But there's a "big" flaw in the comparison. That being the "huge" Intel stock cooler you used.
This is what you get nowadays

 
Not this

Good video.
But there's a "big" flaw in the comparison. That being the "huge" Intel stock cooler you used.
This is what you get nowadays

 
Not this

Good video.
But there's a "big" flaw in the comparison. That being the "huge" Intel stock cooler you used.
This is what you get nowadays

 
Not this

Good video.
But there's a "big" flaw in the comparison. That being the "huge" Intel stock cooler you used.
This is what you get nowadays

 
Not this

Good video.
But there's a "big" flaw in the comparison. That being the "huge" Intel stock cooler you used.
This is what you get nowadays

 
Not this

Did you actually understand what those two graphs show?
Or did you even bother reading the article behind the link or in fact, actually just understand any of it? Since it seems like you did not.
 
~10% higher total system power consumption is "margin of error"?
How about you take a minute to comprehend what that means when you remove the motherboard/RAM/GPU/etc. from the equation and only look at dynamic CPU power...
In case your brain can't comprehend it or you're too lazy to actually read the article, the systems slice of the power consumption was ~130W and so with the 2600K running at 2Ghz@1.290V it means the dynamic CPU power went from 69W to 92W. That's a 33% increase.
Or for the 3Ghz@1.491V test it's 140W>165W = +17.8%.
The difference with the higher clockspeed+voltage test isn't as big because for that load, the NH-D14 passive cooled by the floor fan blowing air on it could not get the CPU temp lower than 67C vs the 47C CPU temp for the 2Ghz@1.290V load.
 
@LinusTech This needs a follow up Workshop episode where you take it to the extreme: aircooling with extremely high temperatures vs watercooling with as low temperatures as you can muster along with fixed clockspeeds and voltages. For both CPU/GPU of course.

Holy shit Batman   This is going to be amazing.
Finished reading your previous build and thought that was really, really impressive and then saw this. 
Keep up the good work