Jump to content

Can someone help this fps things

Go to solution Solved by Streetguru,
1 minute ago, TheOnlyBadMax said:

Well, make no sense for me. Fps is higher than the Hz but graphics will change the performance.

the higher your fps the smoother the gameplay will be, it normally won't matter that your fps is higher than your refresh rate.
 

 

if my monitor is 60 Hz then everything over 60 fps I shouldn't have noticed any differences, but sometimes if I do some epic graphics settings so I can see better I have 70 fps + but feels a lot NOT smoother(sorry bad england). i don't understand this fps, smoothness and monitor Hz, pls help. I feel like when I have more fps the game is more smooth, but I have a 60 Hz monitor, it shouldn't happen, I have no idea.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/990610-can-someone-help-this-fps-things/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats partly placebo effect. But I get it. If you get under 60 fps it will feel like you are "lagging". But you will only notice how high your hertz is in fps. And you can keep it on 60 (if you can hit that normally) with a frame limit or a sync technology. And you can overclock a monitor. If you want to know anything more, just ask!

Link to post
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, TheOnlyBadMax said:

 

Just set it to high and use fast sync or enhanced sync

I edit my posts a lot, Twitter is @LordStreetguru just don't ask PC questions there mostly...
 

Spoiler

 

What is your budget/country for your new PC?

 

what monitor resolution/refresh rate?

 

What games or other software do you need to run?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LukeSavenije said:

If you get under 60 fps

i mean i never get under 60 fps, it's always over 60. if i use low setting in rainbow six sidge i will get 100+ fps and it's very smooth, but if i can't spot evemy with low graphics so i changed it to high settings the fps is ok, never hit under 70fps but i do feel 'not smooth' game play, not lagging but just feel slow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, TheOnlyBadMax said:

I'm not sure what you mean, the vsync?

What's your GPU?

I edit my posts a lot, Twitter is @LordStreetguru just don't ask PC questions there mostly...
 

Spoiler

 

What is your budget/country for your new PC?

 

what monitor resolution/refresh rate?

 

What games or other software do you need to run?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, TheOnlyBadMax said:

Nvidia GTX 1060 3gb

it just works like V-sync without latency, but you have to stay above your monitor's refresh rate

And if your card is running out of VRAM it will stutter, does it stutter at lower settings?
 

 

I edit my posts a lot, Twitter is @LordStreetguru just don't ask PC questions there mostly...
 

Spoiler

 

What is your budget/country for your new PC?

 

what monitor resolution/refresh rate?

 

What games or other software do you need to run?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What he's asking is: If my monitor can only display a maximum of 60Hz, then why do I notice a difference between low-quality settings being smooth (100fps) vs ultra-quality settings being not smooth (70fps)? They are both being above 60fps so why is there a difference in feel if my monitor is only displaying 60hz/fps?

I would like to know the answer aswell

i5-6600K 3,50GHz | Motherboard Gigabyte B150M-D3H | RAM Crucial Ballistix 16GB DDR4-2400 | GTX970 | 500GB SSD EVO | 2560x1440p 27" | Corsair 650W 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Streetguru said:

it just works like V-sync without latency, but you have to stay above your monitor's refresh rate

And if your card is running out of VRAM it will stutter, does it stutter at lower settings?

it works very well on low graphic and i'm not out of the v ram. thanks i'll try fast sync

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hielke said:

What he's asking is: If my monitor can only display a maximum of 60Hz, then why do I notice a difference between low-quality settings being smooth (100fps) vs ultra-quality settings being not smooth (70fps)? They are both being above 60fps so why is there a difference in feel?

I would like to know the answer aswell

Smart dude :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TheOnlyBadMax said:

it works very well on low graphic and i'm not out of the v ram. thanks i'll try fast sync

Then something is casuing stuttering and you should just lower every setting besides view distance.

I edit my posts a lot, Twitter is @LordStreetguru just don't ask PC questions there mostly...
 

Spoiler

 

What is your budget/country for your new PC?

 

what monitor resolution/refresh rate?

 

What games or other software do you need to run?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheOnlyBadMax said:

Well, make no sense for me. Fps is higher than the Hz but graphics will change the performance.

the higher your fps the smoother the gameplay will be, it normally won't matter that your fps is higher than your refresh rate.
 

 

I edit my posts a lot, Twitter is @LordStreetguru just don't ask PC questions there mostly...
 

Spoiler

 

What is your budget/country for your new PC?

 

what monitor resolution/refresh rate?

 

What games or other software do you need to run?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Streetguru said:

the higher your fps the smoother the gameplay will be, it normally won't matter that your fps is higher than your refresh rate.

A lot people say that if you have a 60 Hz monitor then there is pretty much same if youhave higher fps, and that's whythey buy 144hz oir higher. but is hz and fps works same way? 1fps = 1 hz?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheOnlyBadMax said:

A lot people say that if you have a 60 Hz monitor then there is pretty much same if youhave higher fps, and that's whythey buy 144hz oir higher. but is hz and fps works same way? 1fps = 1 hz?

Just watch that video for a quick explanation, higher fps will still look better even on a 60hz display .

I edit my posts a lot, Twitter is @LordStreetguru just don't ask PC questions there mostly...
 

Spoiler

 

What is your budget/country for your new PC?

 

what monitor resolution/refresh rate?

 

What games or other software do you need to run?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, TheOnlyBadMax said:

ty so much, i feel like 144 hz is worthless now xD

144hz is still better, as is 240hz, because you will physically see more frames, and notice things sooner than if you were at 60hz.

I edit my posts a lot, Twitter is @LordStreetguru just don't ask PC questions there mostly...
 

Spoiler

 

What is your budget/country for your new PC?

 

what monitor resolution/refresh rate?

 

What games or other software do you need to run?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Hielke said:

What he's asking is: If my monitor can only display a maximum of 60Hz, then why do I notice a difference between low-quality settings being smooth (100fps) vs ultra-quality settings being not smooth (70fps)? They are both being above 60fps so why is there a difference in feel if my monitor is only displaying 60hz/fps?

I would like to know the answer aswell

 

15 minutes ago, LukeSavenije said:

I still say its just placebo. It feels like it is, but it isn't. You just think so becouse you see a higher number.

It may not be completely a placebo effect. You will notice the difference between running 60-70 FPS average with dips to anything <60 FPS and running an average 120 FPS dipping only to maybe >70 FPS. In the former case you will notice it as the game stuttering, or not feeling completely smooth, because for a moment your GPU couldn't deliver the required 60 frames per second. In the latter case you are consistently above your monitor's refresh rate so you're always getting a steady supply of images.

Crystal: CPU: i7 7700K | Motherboard: Asus ROG Strix Z270F | RAM: GSkill 16 GB@3200MHz | GPU: Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti FE | Case: Corsair Crystal 570X (black) | PSU: EVGA Supernova G2 1000W | Monitor: Asus VG248QE 24"

Laptop: Dell XPS 13 9370 | CPU: i5 10510U | RAM: 16 GB

Server: CPU: i5 4690k | RAM: 16 GB | Case: Corsair Graphite 760T White | Storage: 19 TB

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tikker said:

 

It may not be completely a placebo effect. You will notice the difference between running 60-70 FPS average with dips to anything <60 FPS and running an average 120 FPS dipping only to maybe >70 FPS. In the former case you will notice it as the game stuttering, or not feeling completely smooth, because for a moment your GPU couldn't deliver the required 60 frames per second. In the latter case you are consistently above your monitor's refresh rate so you're always getting a steady supply of images.

Okay, so you notice it when it goes slightly lower then the refresh rate, but on a 60 hz you won't notice the difference between 80 and 300 fps

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, LukeSavenije said:

Okay, so you notice it when it goes slightly lower then the refresh rate, but on a 60 hz you won't notice the difference between 80 and 300 fps

As long as you don't go below 60, true, you won't see the difference. That is why e.g. the 99th percentile may be more interesting rather than the average.

Crystal: CPU: i7 7700K | Motherboard: Asus ROG Strix Z270F | RAM: GSkill 16 GB@3200MHz | GPU: Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti FE | Case: Corsair Crystal 570X (black) | PSU: EVGA Supernova G2 1000W | Monitor: Asus VG248QE 24"

Laptop: Dell XPS 13 9370 | CPU: i5 10510U | RAM: 16 GB

Server: CPU: i5 4690k | RAM: 16 GB | Case: Corsair Graphite 760T White | Storage: 19 TB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×