Jump to content

Why PhysX is so demanding?

J.b091

I\m playing mainly only one game - Killing Floor 2. Have this PC: i7, 16GB RAM and GTX 1070 with 29 inch monitor with 2560x1080 resolution & in graphics settings if I set everything on ultra except Flex and Gibs it gives me constant and stable 60 fps no matter how intense are scenes, BUT if I activate Flex or even Flex and Gibs than during combat performance (fps) might drop to 45-40 sometimes. Visually I don't even see difference that much, but it kills performance. Also on Gibs it says GTX 770 or higher is recommended, but even with GTX 1070 I still experience performance loss. Why? Why this feature is so demanding? Can anyone explain me? Thought GTX 1070 would be enough for PhysX.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Older titles with new hardware might not perform well because of optimization and different software intended to be used with the hardware. I think that not many titles use physx this days so new cards aren't designed with that in mind.

Tag me @mbox or quote me if you want me to read

CPU Ryzen 5 1600 @3.9GHz  MOBO Asus Prime X370 Pro  GPU XFX RX 580 GTS XXX 8GB

COOLER Noctua NH-U12S  RAM 2x4GB HyperX Predator 3000 MHz  SSD Samsung 850 evo 250GB  CASE NZXT s340

MONITOR 1 AOC G2590PX MONITOR 2 LG 29WN600

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, J.b091 said:

I\m playing mainly only one game - Killing Floor 2. Have this PC: i7, 16GB RAM and GTX 1070 with 29 inch monitor with 2560x1080 resolution & in graphics settings if I set everything on ultra except Flex and Gibs it gives me constant and stable 60 fps no matter how intense are scenes, BUT if I activate Flex or even Flex and Gibs than during combat performance (fps) might drop to 45-40 sometimes. Visually I don't even see difference that much, but it kills performance. Also on Gibs it says GTX 770 or higher is recommended, but even with GTX 1070 I still experience performance loss. Why? Why this feature is so demanding? Can anyone explain me? Thought GTX 1070 would be enough for PhysX.

If you dont see a difference, just leave it off. Some older games simply do not perform well on new high end hardware since they can not utilize all new features. Also PhysX was never very efficient and only few titles utilized it and even fewer utilized it well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it actually maxing out your CPU/GPU or both? If not then most probably not optimize.

| Intel i7-3770@4.2Ghz | Asus Z77-V | Zotac 980 Ti Amp! Omega | DDR3 1800mhz 4GB x4 | 300GB Intel DC S3500 SSD | 512GB Plextor M5 Pro | 2x 1TB WD Blue HDD |
 | Enermax NAXN82+ 650W 80Plus Bronze | Fiio E07K | Grado SR80i | Cooler Master XB HAF EVO | Logitech G27 | Logitech G600 | CM Storm Quickfire TK | DualShock 4 |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, xAcid9 said:

Does it actually maxing out your CPU/GPU or both? If not then most probably not optimize.

even if they are maxed, does't meant the game is well optimized. A game can still look like crap and max your gpu all day long. Also some features take a huge performance hit for very little improvement. Look at Tesselation and Nvidia Hair works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just found thread on their forum and seems like everyone is complaining of that feature in game and either it's not optimized, either broken... Here link if anyone is interested: https://forums.tripwireinteractive.com/forum/killing-floor-2/killing-floor-2-general/general-discussion-af/2285623-nvidia-flex-fps-drops-still-happening-to-anyone/page2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×