Jump to content

10Gbit PFSense Router

Aelita Sophie
Go to solution Solved by System Error Message,
Just now, Aelita Sophie said:

So then out of the 2 options, the Dell R620 with 2x E5-2609 and 64GB DDR3 would be the best option then. Granted if we evenly place the RAM over the slots for effectively 8 channels. Do I understand that correct?

that is correct

when it comes to routing more ram bandwidth is used. This is because data is passed back and forth within the system before it is sent out again. Many here dont really know the link between ram bandwidth and routing performance. Mikrotik's CCR 1072 has charts that show the throughput under different ram speeds. Faster ram gives more throughput as the CCR1072 uses DDR3 and is capable of 80Gb/s throughput which reaches the limit of dual channel DDR3 bandwidth. Even though dual channel DDR3 may seem like it has ample bandwidth for 10Gb/s, it does improve the performance to have more especially because it has to send data to and from the ram and NIC cards too so just 10Gb/s can easily use up the dual channel DDR3 bandwidth.

 

7 minutes ago, Lurick said:

Have you checked out the Nexus 9K lineup recently?

Prices have come down quite a bit and performance has only gotten better. It might not be exactly on the nose with everyone else but it's far better than where it was.

I can't speak for the routing side of the house though as that isn't exactly my specialty. I tend to focus on Data Center and Security :) 

Not gonna say Cisco is the greatest vendor for Price/Performance ratio but they are doing much better, even if it's only on switching.

Different in datacenter and switching. For switching purposes cisco is still good to consider even for the price. For routing though the good cisco is very expensive and cisco RVs are horrible things that smaller businesses and homes get caught up with when trying to get a router for vpn or security as it fails at both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, System Error Message said:

Different in datacenter and switching. For switching purposes cisco is still good to consider even for the price. For routing though the good cisco is very expensive and cisco RVs are horrible things that smaller businesses and homes get caught up with when trying to get a router for vpn or security as it fails at both.

Yah, the small business stuff needs a huge overhaul and some of it I'm not even sure why we still sell it =/ 

Current Network Layout:

Current Build Log/PC:

Prior Build Log/PC:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, System Error Message said:

when it comes to routing more ram bandwidth is used. This is because data is passed back and forth within the system before it is sent out again. Many here dont really know the link between ram bandwidth and routing performance. Mikrotik's CCR 1072 has charts that show the throughput under different ram speeds. Faster ram gives more throughput as the CCR1072 uses DDR3 and is capable of 80Gb/s throughput which reaches the limit of dual channel DDR3 bandwidth. Even though dual channel DDR3 may seem like it has ample bandwidth for 10Gb/s, it does improve the performance to have more especially because it has to send data to and from the ram and NIC cards too so just 10Gb/s can easily use up the dual channel DDR3 bandwidth.

 

Different in datacenter and switching. For switching purposes cisco is still good to consider even for the price. For routing though the good cisco is very expensive and cisco RVs are horrible things that smaller businesses and homes get caught up with when trying to get a router for vpn or security as it fails at both.

So going on that, the Lower Powered Xeon E3-1220 V5 with Dual Channel DDR4 would be a better option then a high power 2x Xeon E5-2609 with Quad Channel DDR3? Because we are a bit unsure which would suit the job best.

Main RIG: i7 4770k ~ 4.8Ghz | Intel HD Onboard (enough for my LoL gaming) | Samsung 960 Pro 256GB NVMe | 32GB (4x 8GB) Kingston Savage 2133Mhz DDR3 | MSI Z97 Gaming 7 | ThermalTake FrioOCK | MS-Tech (puke) 700W | Windows 10 64Bit

Mining RIG: AMD A6-9500 | ASRock AB350 Pro | 4GB DDR4 | 500GB 2.5 Inch HDD | 2x MSI AERO GTX 1060 6GB (Core/Memory/TDP/Avg Temp +160/+800/120%/45c) | 1x Asus Strix GTX 970 (+195/+400/125%/55c) | 1x KFA2 GTX 960 (+220/+500/120%/70c) | Corsair GS800 800W | HP HSTNS-PD05 1000W | (Modded) Inter-Tech IPC 4U-4129-N Rackmount Case

Guest RIG: FX6300 | AMD HD7870 | Kingston HyperX 128GB SSD | 16GB (2x 8GB) G.Skill Ripjaws 1600Mhz DDR3 | Some ASRock 970 Mobo | Stock Heatsink | some left over PSU  | Windows 10 64Bit

VM Server: HP Proliant DL160 G6 | 2x Intel Xeon E5620 @ 2.4Ghz 4c/8t (8c/16t total) | 16GB (8x 2GB) HP 1066Mhz ECC DDR3 | 2x Western Digital Black 250GB HDD | VMWare ESXI

Storage Node: 2x Intel Xeon E5520 @ 2.27Ghz 4c/8t (8c/16t total) | Intel ServerBoard S5500HCV | 36GB (9x 4GB) 1333Mhz ECC DDR3 | 3x Seagate 2TB 7200RPM | 4x Western Digital Caviar Green 2TB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Aelita Sophie said:

So going on that, the Lower Powered Xeon E3-1220 V5 with Dual Channel DDR4 would be a better option then a high power 2x Xeon E5-2609 with Quad Channel DDR3? Because we are a bit unsure which would suit the job best.

the quad channel DDR3 is faster. DDR4 does not have double the bandwidth of DDR3. Dual channel DDR4 is 20GB/s everytime i check from memtest. Using SPD speeds, as the frequency is increased, so does the timings. Infact the speed difference between DDR3 and DDR4 isnt much when both can have the same clocks (2Ghz-2.4Ghz).

 

Quad channel will handle the 80Gb/s bandwidth required for symmetrical 10Gb/s routing (10Gb/s to ram, ram to CPU, CPU to ram, ram to NIC totalling about 40Gb/s which is 5GB/s). This is if only basic routing is done. The more processing that is done the more bandwidth may be required. While dual channel ddr4 could run this the more ram bandwidth you can throw at it and ensuring there are sufficient PCIe lanes the better. With 2 xeons you effectively have 8 channels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, System Error Message said:

the quad channel DDR3 is faster. DDR4 does not have double the bandwidth of DDR3. Dual channel DDR4 is 20GB/s everytime i check from memtest. Using SPD speeds, as the frequency is increased, so does the timings. Infact the speed difference between DDR3 and DDR4 isnt much when both can have the same clocks (2Ghz-2.4Ghz).

 

Quad channel will handle the 80Gb/s bandwidth required for symmetrical 10Gb/s routing (10Gb/s to ram, ram to CPU, CPU to ram, ram to NIC totalling about 40Gb/s which is 5GB/s). This is if only basic routing is done. The more processing that is done the more bandwidth may be required. While dual channel ddr4 could run this the more ram bandwidth you can throw at it and ensuring there are sufficient PCIe lanes the better. With 2 xeons you effectively have 8 channels.

So then out of the 2 options, the Dell R620 with 2x E5-2609 and 64GB DDR3 would be the best option then. Granted if we evenly place the RAM over the slots for effectively 8 channels. Do I understand that correct?

Main RIG: i7 4770k ~ 4.8Ghz | Intel HD Onboard (enough for my LoL gaming) | Samsung 960 Pro 256GB NVMe | 32GB (4x 8GB) Kingston Savage 2133Mhz DDR3 | MSI Z97 Gaming 7 | ThermalTake FrioOCK | MS-Tech (puke) 700W | Windows 10 64Bit

Mining RIG: AMD A6-9500 | ASRock AB350 Pro | 4GB DDR4 | 500GB 2.5 Inch HDD | 2x MSI AERO GTX 1060 6GB (Core/Memory/TDP/Avg Temp +160/+800/120%/45c) | 1x Asus Strix GTX 970 (+195/+400/125%/55c) | 1x KFA2 GTX 960 (+220/+500/120%/70c) | Corsair GS800 800W | HP HSTNS-PD05 1000W | (Modded) Inter-Tech IPC 4U-4129-N Rackmount Case

Guest RIG: FX6300 | AMD HD7870 | Kingston HyperX 128GB SSD | 16GB (2x 8GB) G.Skill Ripjaws 1600Mhz DDR3 | Some ASRock 970 Mobo | Stock Heatsink | some left over PSU  | Windows 10 64Bit

VM Server: HP Proliant DL160 G6 | 2x Intel Xeon E5620 @ 2.4Ghz 4c/8t (8c/16t total) | 16GB (8x 2GB) HP 1066Mhz ECC DDR3 | 2x Western Digital Black 250GB HDD | VMWare ESXI

Storage Node: 2x Intel Xeon E5520 @ 2.27Ghz 4c/8t (8c/16t total) | Intel ServerBoard S5500HCV | 36GB (9x 4GB) 1333Mhz ECC DDR3 | 3x Seagate 2TB 7200RPM | 4x Western Digital Caviar Green 2TB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Aelita Sophie said:

So then out of the 2 options, the Dell R620 with 2x E5-2609 and 64GB DDR3 would be the best option then. Granted if we evenly place the RAM over the slots for effectively 8 channels. Do I understand that correct?

that is correct

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×