RX 560 4gb for vr

[NicholasNicholasNicholas]

1 minute ago, App4that said:

Oi. 

 

10-20% is the difference between tiers. as I said easier to see as the fps rise. 20% is not a slight improvement.

 

Not support, that lists DX12 ports. If you don't understand the difference between ported to DX12 and exclusively DX12, it's something you should look into. HUGE difference.  

ok, you win, but im still standing by my point that the 480 is far better than a 970. even if it isnt, it will inevitably do better in games without a bias. hell, even firestrike, a dx11 bench, favours my 480 over a 980. http://www.3dmark.com/fs/12801264

[App4that]

3 minutes ago, Nickathom said:

ok, you win, but im still standing by my point that the 480 is far better than a 970. even if it isnt, it will inevitably do better in games without a bias. hell, even firestrike, a dx11 bench, favours my 480 over a 980. http://www.3dmark.com/fs/12801264

Oh shit bro, no argument there. I'd pay extra for a 480 over the 970 on memory alone. I'm just a numbers guy, we're bat shit about numbers. 

[48DUL]

11 hours ago, Max_Settings said:

I don't believe the RX 560 meets minimum spec for VR. Get an RX 580

okay but how come AMD says the card is vr ready?

[xAcid9]

24 minutes ago, 48DUL said:

okay but how come AMD says the card is vr ready?

Where exactly they said that?

 

http://www.amd.com/en/technologies/vr-ready-premium