Need help GT 430

[-_-pcnaab-_-]

My monitors don't receive VGA/DVI conection from my GPU anymore, this happened overnight, and i can't figure out why. I pulled out my GPU and used the onboard graphics wich work fine. So i was wondering if anyone know if and why it stopped working so suddenly. Its a old MSI GT430 but unfortunately it's all i have at the moment.

PC specs:

Windows 7 64 bit

Intel I5 2500

ASrock Z77 Pro4

[Guest]

Did you clean it/put it together again? Did it start working? Have you changed some bios settings "overnight"? If all of them answers are "no" (except the first question), it's broken and you should replace it. Untill then, you seem to have onboard graphics, which work just fine >>> you have something else at the moment.

 

I also wonder... Is that GPU better then your onboard video?!?

[-_-pcnaab-_-]

5 minutes ago, Dutch-stoner said:

Did you clean it/put it together again? Did it start working? Have you changed some bios settings "overnight"? If all of them answers are "no" (except the first question), it's broken and you should replace it. Untill then, you seem to have onboard graphics, which work just fine >>> you have something else at the moment.

 

I also wonder... Is that GPU better then your onboard video?!?

Ik kon op mijn GPU Heroes of the storm met lowest setings en 1920x1080 met 50-122 fps runnen, en de omboard graphics geven op 720p 13-40 dus nee. En ik heb mijn GPU recent schoongemaakt en zelfs de cooling paste vervangen, waardoor hij 10 c cooler was. dus ik denk dat, tot mijn vrees, hij kapot is.

Sorry for replying in Dutch but my english is kinda rusty. But it is solved anyways

[TheRandomness]

6 minutes ago, Dutch-stoner said:

I also wonder... Is that GPU better then your onboard video?!?

The GT 430 is 215% better than the HD 2000 on the i5 according to userbenchmark.

[-_-pcnaab-_-]

1 minute ago, TheRandomness said:

The GT 430 is 215% better than the HD 2000 on the i5 according to userbenchmark.

I was buying a new GPU anyways but that will be next year, will have to do with watching videos and playing shity games ah well.

[Guest]

It's solved as-in it started working acain? Or you know you should replace it...

 

Also, how much ram did you send to your onboard video? Because I was sporting a gt610 1 gb passive cooled GPU, which would beat my onboard video, when I had it set at 256 mb... Changed my onboard vid to 2 gb, and it beats my 610 easy.

 

(if you like, I could type this text in dutch, but me thinks you can read English)

 

6 minutes ago, TheRandomness said:

The GT 430 is 215% better than the HD 2000 on the i5 according to userbenchmark.

Nvm all of the above then.

 

*EDIT: that CPU seems to use an HD 3000, according to the dutch tech site "tweakers". Only 56% slower then the 430 gt. And considering USerbenchmark isn't that reliable, they COULD be about the same speeds.

[TheRandomness]

12 minutes ago, Dutch-stoner said:

It's solved as-in it started working acain? Or you know you should replace it...

 

Also, how much ram did you send to your onboard video? Because I was sporting a gt610 1 gb passive cooled GPU, which would beat my onboard video, when I had it set at 256 mb... Changed my onboard vid to 2 gb, and it beats my 610 easy.

 

(if you like, I could type this text in dutch, but me thinks you can read English)

 

Nvm all of the above then.

 

*EDIT: that CPU seems to use an HD 3000, according to the dutch tech site "tweakers". Only 56% slower then the 430 gt. And considering USerbenchmark isn't that reliable, they COULD be about the same speeds.

According to intel ark, it uses HD 2000, which is much slower.

[Guest]

Ok @TheRandomness.

 

@-_-pcnaab-_-, depending on some answers I get, and some hard thinking, I might have a passive cooled 610 gt laying around. It's crap, but according to userbenchmark, it's 66% better then your HD 2000 onboard vid card. If you're interested, reply here because PM's don't always work for me.