Graphics Card Manufacturers?

[Guest lilbman]

Are there any other companies that make graphics cards BESIDES AMD and NVIDIA?  Please give examples.

 

Just curious.

[Guest]

Intel

[danwager11]

There are AIOs like what consoles use or mobile AIO chips.

[danwager11]

There are AIOs like what consoles use or mobile AIO chips.

[RGProductions]

1 minute ago, deXxterlab97 said:

 

 

Not to get too into it, but that's a coprocessor, not a graphics processor. But yes, they do make iGPUs, I know.

[danwager11]

2 minutes ago, deXxterlab97 said:

Intel

That's a photoshoped AMD GPU lol

[RGProductions]

Just now, danwager11 said:

That's a photoshoped AMD GPU lol

No, it's a Xeon Phi.

[Guest]

5 hours ago, RGProductions said:

Not to get too into it, but that's a coprocessor, not a graphics processor. But yes, they do make iGPUs, I know.

 

Still it is something close to a card 

[RGProductions]

Just now, deXxterlab97 said:

 

Still it is something close to a card 

 

Yeah, but it functions more like a CPU or an Nvidia Tesla.

[Guest]

5 hours ago, RGProductions said:

Not to get too into it, but that's a coprocessor, not a graphics processor. But yes, they do make iGPUs, I know.

igpu are not cards

[RGProductions]

Just now, deXxterlab97 said:

igpu are not cards

They're close enough

[Dabombinable]

6 minutes ago, lilbman said:

Are there any other companies that make graphics cards BESIDES AMD and NVIDIA?

 

Just curious.

Graphics cards, yes. GPU, not really due to all others screwing up badly through out the late parts of the 90's and early 2000's.

[Daveeede]

Everyone is forgetting to mention Matrox. They specialize in multi-display gpu's for workstations and commercial use.

 

http://www.matrox.com/graphics/en/products/graphics_cards/

[Guest]

5 hours ago, Daveeede said:

Everyone is forgetting to mention Matrox. They specialize in multi-display gpu's for workstations and commercial use.

 

http://www.matrox.com/graphics/en/products/graphics_cards/

because someone quote this post and it has everything there

 

[Guest lilbman]

3 minutes ago, deXxterlab97 said:

because someone quote this post and it has everything there

 

 

So is the gaming graphics card market just a dual monopoly between AMD and NVIDIA?

[Dabombinable]

5 minutes ago, Daveeede said:

Everyone is forgetting to mention Matrox. They specialize in multi-display gpu's for workstations and commercial use.

 

http://www.matrox.com/graphics/en/products/graphics_cards/

There is nothing to forget when they use AMD GPU now instead of their own.

[Guest]

5 hours ago, lilbman said:

So is the gaming graphics card market just a dual monopoly between AMD and NVIDIA?

Pretty much so but then there are some people who are gaming on an integrated gpu so...

[Dabombinable]

Just now, lilbman said:

So is the gaming graphics card market just a dual monopoly between AMD and NVIDIA?

The GPU market is yes, there are loads of graphics cards manufacturers however.

[Guest lilbman]

Just now, deXxterlab97 said:

Pretty much so but then there are some people who are gaming on an integrated gpu so...

Gaming on integrated gpus is like racing with a Datsun.

[Guest]

5 hours ago, lilbman said:

Gaming on integrated gpus is like racing with a Datsun.

I thought you meant dat sun (that sun) but it is actually a car oh well

[Dabombinable]

6 minutes ago, lilbman said:

Gaming on integrated gpus is like racing with a Datsun.

Not so much if its Iris Pro 580 graphics-those iGPU beat out nearly all of the low end GPU market by a large margin.

[ARikozuM]

7 minutes ago, lilbman said:

Gaming on integrated gpus is like racing with a Datsun.

Have you seen a Fairlady? F#cking gorgeous when upgraded.

[Daveeede]

11 minutes ago, Dabombinable said:

There is nothing to forget when they use AMD GPU now instead of their own.

I thought I heard this but couldn't see anything about it on their website. Good to know.

[Dabombinable]

23 minutes ago, Daveeede said:

I thought I heard this but couldn't see anything about it on their website. Good to know.

Its kind of sad, but Matrox weren't able to keep up to Nvidia and AMD in regards to performance. But when compared to GPU of the same age, their old ones had far better image quality than those from AMD and Nvidia, and were the first company to give use multiple displays off the 1 card-both of which are more important to the market Matrox targets than performance.

[ARikozuM]

4 minutes ago, Dabombinable said:

Its kind of sad, but Matrox weren't able to keep up to Nvidia and AMD in regards to performance. But when compared to GPU of the same age, their old ones had far better image quality than those from AMD and Nvidia, and were the first company to give use multiple displays off the 1 card-both of which are more important to the market Matrox targets than performance.

Not too mention that they were one of the only to support expandable memory.