Furmark score help

[jimmyboygr]

I have a gtx 970 g1 gaming,and in furmark 1080p preset my score is oddly high, http://prntscr.com/97suco can someone please tell me why?i mean it is 980ti almost high..and i wanna be realistic that cant be real..

 

 

[pwn_intended]

Its because youre running windows vista and the computing gods feel sorry for you...

[pwn_intended]

But yea, that does seem a little high considering my gtx 670 SLI only gets 4876.

[watts300]

First world problems. "My computer is better than what it should be!"

 

 

I'm curious now. I think I'll see if I can find Furmark to run it on mine. 

 

Edit // @jimmyboygr

 

Nope. You're good.

 

[jimmyboygr]

Its because youre running windows vista and the computing gods feel sorry for you...

for some reason it says i have vista when i have windows 10,i dont know why,maybe it needs clean install and not only upgrade it.hm

[jimmyboygr]

First world problems. "My computer is better than what it should be!"

 

 

I'm curious now. I think I'll see if I can find Furmark to run it on mine. 

 

Edit // @jimmyboygr

 

Nope. You're good.

 

Capturef.JPG

ok your score if its stock 1080p preset is awesome score and its as high as i would expect for our gpu difference,but most guys with 960 i see score 2500 and with 970 score about 4500 so i am consindered if my card had problem,the post wasnt intended for bragging reasons,and i doubt that a "good" chip would make such difference(20 fps difference between my results and others)do you mind telling me your chip asic quality?does it matter?im really curious.

[watts300]

ok your score if its stock 1080p preset is awesome score and its as high as i would expect for our gpu difference,but most guys with 960 i see score 2500 and with 970 score about 4500 so i am consindered if my card had problem,the post wasnt intended for bragging reasons,and i doubt that a "good" chip would make such difference(20 fps difference between my results and others)do you mind telling me your chip asic quality?does it matter?im really curious.

I didn't think you were bragging... it just seemed like an odd thing to inquire about. 

 

I think you asked if I have overclocked my video card. No, I haven't overclocked anything.  When I said "you're good" I meant that since my 980ti got 11k, your 970 getting a 6000 seems appropriate. 

 

I have no idea what you mean by this: "do you mind telling me your chip asic quality?does it matter?im really curious."

Could you rephrase that?

[jimmyboygr]

I didn't think you were bragging... it just seemed like an odd thing to inquire about. 

 

I think you asked if I have overclocked my video card. No, I haven't overclocked anything.  When I said "you're good" I meant that since my 980ti got 11k, your 970 getting a 6000 seems appropriate. 

 

I have no idea what you mean by this: "do you mind telling me your chip asic quality?does it matter?im really curious."

Could you rephrase that?

ok,so in gpuz if you right click on the top of the window and select asic quality,it tells you how lucky you were with your chip,mine was 75.5% quality wehereas my friends 970 that i was comparing and had 20fps difference is 61%.and i ask if that little of difference can make that much of a fps gain.

http://prntscr.com/9872lc

 

[GoryDays]

Im having the same "problem", im running a Asus OC GTX 1060 6gb and in 4k 3840x2160 im getting 105 fps and a score of 6303! i have it over clocked, but i don't feel like i should be seeing numbers like that. On the furmark website the comparative numbers for testing in 4k it shows the gtx 1080 in SLI scoring just over 4000.