6700k vs 5820k Benchmarks?

[Ramontes]

Now im looking to buy either and simply want more information to validate the purchase, I want benchmarks of video rendering times and stuff like that howver i cannot find any in this category simply because every post is flooded by gaming benchmarks which obviously wont be much of a difference in that case. So i want a link or chart to some ttpe of video editing benchmark for these two cpu's I KNOW that the 5820k will obviously beat out the 6700k in the benchmarks but i want to know the marginal difference between the two such as rendering time, and cinibench scores and things like that, i will be overclocking as much as my h100i will allow it to go i dont want any answers saying "get 5820k" or "depends on your workload" i simply want numbers/answers

[Interfectorem]

I have my 5820K at 4.4 GHz and I could go download Cinebench and come back with some results.

[SuperCookie78]

the i7-5820k would be the better option when it comes to rendering and with it you also have the optionm to upgrade to a 5960x or a xeon so 5820k

[Mew]

The 6700k is significantly faster in single thread at their stock speeds due to the pretty big frequency difference.

 

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/1320?vs=1543

[Ramontes]

I have my 5820K at 4.4 GHz and I could go download Cinebench and come back with some results.

just a link to a website would thank you  but if you wish to do that to help me id appreciate that too  i was looking to overclock the 5820k around 4.2-4.5 and 6700k much higher if the silicon lottery allowed me to do so

[Deli]

The 6700k is significantly faster in single thread at their stock speeds due to the pretty big frequency difference.

 

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/1320?vs=1543

Here it comes again.

[Ramontes]

The 6700k is significantly faster in single thread at their stock speeds due to the pretty big frequency difference.

 

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/1320?vs=1543

so from what i understand from these charts is the rendering times range from around 30-60 secs in difference mainly what im paying attention to

[Interfectorem]

just a link to a website would thank you  but if you wish to do that to help me id appreciate that too  i was looking to overclock the 5820k around 4.2-4.5 and 6700k much higher if the silicon lottery allowed me to do so

I scored a 1296 on Cinebench R15 while at 4.4 GHz.

[Ramontes]

the i7-5820k would be the better option when it comes to rendering and with it you also have the optionm to upgrade to a 5960x or a xeon so 5820k

good point to add, i forgot about the option to upgrade 

[Interfectorem]

so from what i understand from these charts is the rendering times range from around 30-60 secs in difference mainly what im paying attention to

Though keep in mind those tests are done at stock clocks, since you're overclocking, that gap in single-threaded performance should close.

[Deli]

I scored a 1296 on Cinebench R15 while at 4.4 GHz.

I score 1380 @ 4.6.

[Ramontes]

I scored a 1296 on Cinebench R15 while at 4.4 GHz.

thank you

[Ramontes]

I score 1380 @ 4.6.

thats 5820k right

[The Pizza Thief]

Just started downloading cinebench so I can benchmark my i7-6700k @4.6

[Deli]

thats 5820k right

Yeah. If you want to use Cinebench 11.5, the score is 15.0.

 

My old 4790K scores 968 @ 4.8GHz. I bet 6700K will be a bit higher.

[Ramontes]

i probably wouldnt argue with myself so much about the cpu choice if the asus deluxe board cost the same on both chipsets i know that the 5820k is better for nearly the same price but thats around a 70-100 ddollar difference on this mobo, which is the one ill be getting as the features suit my needs the best

[SuperCookie78]

 http://imgur.com/yyfjyfB bamb!

[Interfectorem]

I score 1380 @ 4.6.

What voltage do you use for 4.6?

[Deli]

What voltage do you use for 4.6?

My chip isn't the best. 1.29v for 4.5GHz, and 1.35v for 4.6GHz.

[The Pizza Thief]

Scored 1007cb with my i7-6700k @4.0Ghz. Should I give it a try @4.6Ghz? 

 

Edit: Just ran a single core test and got 199cb

[Interfectorem]

My chip isn't the best. 1.29v for 4.5GHz, and 1.35v for 4.6GHz.

I haven't done extensive tweaking but, with a quick test, I'm using 1.35v for 4.4 GHz, I got a worse CPU than you

[Deli]

I haven't done extensive tweaking but, with a quick test, I'm using 1.35v for 4.4 GHz, I got a worse CPU than you

Someone got a 4.8GHz under 1.30v. That's a real good one.

[Interfectorem]

Someone got a 4.8GHz under 1.30v. That's a real good one.

That's insane. I know Paul's Hardware got a 5960X that can do 4.75 or 4.65 GHz on only 1.3v

[Ramontes]

i think at the end of the day i will take those benchmarks and EVERYONES cinebench score into consideration when purchasing the cpu, i will also consider how often i will be using the most of the cpu and see if the trade offs for saving 80 dollars is worth it or not, thank everyone for helping me out with a decision

[Deli]

That's insane. I know Paul's Hardware got a 5960X that can do 4.75 or 4.65 GHz on only 1.3v

Yeah, 4.76 GHz at 1.30v. For a 5960x, that's a golden chip. JaysTwocents' 5960X does 4.4, so is Kyle's 5820K.