Jump to content

Wait or nah?

リチャード

So, I'm finally building a new PC as my current one broke one final time today.

 

But it was the motherboard that gave out, so I was thinking of buying all new things but hard drives, PSU and... I'll either A: Get a new GPU too. B: Keep my current GPU and use that until I wait for the new nVidia cards to hit the market.

 

Which do you think is the better choice?

 

PS. If I keep my current card and wait for the next gen, I will get an i7 5820K with a 2011-3 board and DDR4 memory, obviously. But if I get a new GPU now I can't afford that, so I'd have to settle for either 6700K or 4790K.

 

What say you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're just gaming X99 is totally unnecessary I would just get i5 Haswell or Skylake with a new GPU

                                                                                                                 Setup

CPU: i3 4160|Motherboard: MSI Z97 PC MATE|RAM: Kingston HyperX Blue 8GB(2x4GB)|GPU: Sapphire Nitro R9 380 4GB|PSU: Seasonic M12II EVO 620W Modular|Storage: 1TB WD Blue|Case: NZXT S340 Black|PCIe devices: TP-Link WDN4800| Montior: ASUS VE247H| Others: PS3/PS4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Really depends on what you are using it for...if you are doing a lot of editing and what not then you might benefit from the 6 cores instead of 4. but personally i would go with a 4790K and keep your DDR3 ram and get a new GPU.

Main Rig: | CPU: Intel Core i9-7900x | GPU: Nvidia RTX 2080 Founders | Mobo: Asus ROG Strix X299-E Gaming | RAM: 32GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 MHz | SSD: Samsung 980 Pro w/Heatsink 1TB & Samsung 960 Pro 1TB | Sound: Parasound ZDAC & Burson Soloist Amp | PSU: Corsair RM850 | Fans: 2x Noctua NF-F12 | Case: Caselabs MAGNUM SMA8 | Headphones: Sennheiser HD 800 | Keyboard: WASD V3 | Mouse: Logitech G502 Lightspeed | Mousepad: Logitech G PowerPlay | CPU Cooler: bequiet! Dark Rock Pro 3 | Primary Monitor: Acer Predator XB272 | Extra Monitors: Samsung Syncmaster PX2370 |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

PS. If I keep my current card and wait for the next gen, I will get an i7 5820K with a 2011-3 board and DDR4 memory, obviously. But if I get a new GPU now I can't afford that, so I'd have to settle for either 6700K or 4790K.

but... skylake is similarly priced to haswell-e... that doesnt make sense...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh shit you have the same Radeon as me ! Sup bro represent !

I never use that PC anymore so I'd have to say get a new GPU - everything else in the system was acceptable.

4790k is what I'm using currently and I doubt you'll regret that full upgrade for the money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're just gaming X99 is totally unnecessary I would just get i5 Haswell or Skylake with a new GPU

Really depends on what you are using it for...if you are doing a lot of editing and what not then you might benefit from the 6 cores instead of 4. but personally i would go with a 4790K and keep your DDR3 ram and get a new GPU.

 

I feel like getting a 6 core instead of a 4 core is that nudge it needs to let me keep it for 2 more years. Also, it's like $100 more than getting a 6700K. Getting an i5 is not my thing. I Overclock and lately I've often been using around 80% on all processing cores on my current quad core, so I feel like investing in a good CPU is worth it. I'm the kind of guy who does a lot of things at once on the computer, then leaves everything open and just lets it pull resources in the background. But I use all of it so often that I can't close anything down because it would be a bother having to reopen things constantly. I appreciate your advice though.

 

but... skylake is similarly priced to haswell-e... that doesnt make sense...

 

That depends on whether I get the DDR3 motherboard or DDR4. I would feel like getting a DDR3 would be a waste, since DDR3 hopefully will be extinct in a few years.

 

Oh shit you have the same Radeon as me ! Sup bro represent !

I never use that PC anymore so I'd have to say get a new GPU - everything else in the system was acceptable.

4790k is what I'm using currently and I doubt you'll regret that full upgrade for the money.

 

Hahaha, yeah man! She complains a lot and she's getting a bit wrinkly but I still love her.

 

See, but I don't upgrade all that often. So I rather just getting something better and let it live its days out like I did this one.

 

 

 

PS. 4790K is 7500/8.25 = $900

6700K DDR4 is 9000/8.25 = $1100

5820K is 10000/8.25 = $1200

 

w/o graphics card, harddrives & PSU.

 

Then, after a couple months of saving up for the latest GPU... I don't know, I feel like I'm kind of answering my own question here, and my heart seems pretty much set on getting the 5820K. Looking at that measly $200 difference.. for like.. a quite nice performance boost.. or at least life span of the computer..

 

I appreciate all your comments though. If you think I'm making the wrong choice, then please tell me so :)

 

EDIT: Looking at some benchmarks the 6700K is actually outperforming the 5820K in all categories, despite the 2 extra cores. And now I'm not sure again.... damnit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

--

for the Z chipsets i can really recommend the MSI krait motherboards, they are visually appealing, come with SLI (y'know, you might one day make use of it)

i recommend them a lot, and i've actually never got quoted with truly negative comments about them. (aside from the usual fanboyism i ignore when i'm not in a trolling mood)

 

and the reason skylake seems to outperform haswell-e (by a decent amount) even though haswell-e has more cores, is that a lot of gaming-oriented scenarios really cant use those two extra cores all that well... in case you're going to be editing or livestreaming or stuff of that nature haswell-e becomes really appealing. but on the other side, if you're dealing with a lot of single threaded applications skylake has a mindblowingly big advantage, even at stock clock. as well as skylake feeling like a bit too good of an overclocker for intel not to be hiding something.

i have this mini-conspiracy theory intel is hiding a skylake refresh in case ZEN kicks their ass, basicly bumping up stock clocks to make AMD less relevant again.

it feels very weird to me a 4GHz stock part overclocks past 5GHz on air without any problems. finding a haswell i5 or i7 that touched that speed on liquid was pretty rare

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think you're making a bad choice - one of the hardest decisions for me was choosing between X99 and Z97 chipsets - and the extra PCIe lanes definitely do come into play for my usage. I tried to downsize a bit, so that's really the only reason I went with Z97: there was hardly any choice for small X99 boards at the time.

If you're not going to regret spending the money then do it. My Radeon needs a repaste - if yours can hold you up til Pascal (if that's what you meant by new nVidias) then definitely do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4790k + R9 390X or R9 Fury...

got a 4790k myself and really.... it is all you need for A LONG WHILE... aint a chance in hell you will need a stronger CPU for years.... even if you do, its a "K" model.... so just OC the shit out of it and it will last another year or two easily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×