Jump to content

AMD R9 380

leunaM

Hello!

 

I just ordered this card (the Nitro variant) any thoughts?

 

Was it a good purchase? 

 

Could have the GTX 960 been a better option?

 

 

Thanks guys!  :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say it was good purchase. If it was me I would have chosen 960, just because I like Nvidia more. The two a really similar in performance, so either one is pretty good. 

CPU: AMD FX 8320  CPU Cooler: 212 Evo GPU: Asus GTX 750 Ti @ 1400MHz RAM: Crucial Ballistix Sport 8GB (2x4gb) MOBO: ASUS M5A97 R2.0 Power Supply: Evga G2 650 Storage: Western Digital Caviar Blue 1TB, San Disk Ultra 240 GB SSD Case: Corsair 230t Orange

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fantastic purchase for that price point :)

The 960 falls behind by around 15% at the time of writing this.

Archangel (Desktop) CPU: i5 4590 GPU:Asus R9 280  3GB RAM:HyperX Beast 2x4GBPSU:SeaSonic S12G 750W Mobo:GA-H97m-HD3 Case:CM Silencio 650 Storage:1 TB WD Red
Celestial (Laptop 1) CPU:i7 4720HQ GPU:GTX 860M 4GB RAM:2x4GB SK Hynix DDR3Storage: 250GB 850 EVO Model:Lenovo Y50-70
Seraph (Laptop 2) CPU:i7 6700HQ GPU:GTX 970M 3GB RAM:2x8GB DDR4Storage: 256GB Samsung 951 + 1TB Toshiba HDD Model:Asus GL502VT

Windows 10 is now MSX! - http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/440190-can-we-start-calling-windows-10/page-6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good option that memory bus just holds back the 960 4GB so much.

                                                                                                                 Setup

CPU: i3 4160|Motherboard: MSI Z97 PC MATE|RAM: Kingston HyperX Blue 8GB(2x4GB)|GPU: Sapphire Nitro R9 380 4GB|PSU: Seasonic M12II EVO 620W Modular|Storage: 1TB WD Blue|Case: NZXT S340 Black|PCIe devices: TP-Link WDN4800| Montior: ASUS VE247H| Others: PS3/PS4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good option that memory bus just holds back the 960 4GB so much.

 

People have always said that about Nvidia cards right up to the 780 Ti and there's never been any evidence supporting it. To me it just looks like AMD went the route of overengineering the hardware, while Nvidia went the route of optimisation. Both seemed to reach the same end result.

 

Even AMD isn't immune from this criticism, the 285 (aka the 380) has a much smaller bus than the 280X and less VRAM as well yet AMD claim that its memory performance surpasses the older card.

 

It strikes me as funny that you guys think you can look at some numbers on a chart and think you can assess cards more accurately than either Nvidia or AMD.

 

As to OP's question -- the 285 and 960 perform interchangeably. It would have been a different option, but you can't truthfully claim one is better than the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

People have always said that about Nvidia cards right up to the 780 Ti and there's never been any evidence supporting it. To me it just looks like AMD went the route of overengineering the hardware, while Nvidia went the route of optimisation. Both seemed to reach the same end result.

 

Even AMD isn't immune from this criticism, the 285 (aka the 380) has a much smaller bus than the 280X and less VRAM as well yet AMD claim that its memory performance surpasses the older card.

 

It strikes me as funny that you guys think you can look at some numbers on a chart and think you can assess cards more accurately than either Nvidia or AMD.

 

As to OP's question -- the 285 and 960 perform interchangeably. It would have been a different option, but you can't truthfully claim one is better than the other.

Well you can't always believe what AMD or Nvidia say about cards, Fury X was hyped up to be than 980Ti through all sorts of supposed benchamarks and AMD did well hyping it up to be the best card on the market but we all know how that turned out. Not disagreeing that the 380(285) is pretty much similar to the 960 but you can't always believe what companies say and I would still take a 280X over a 380.

                                                                                                                 Setup

CPU: i3 4160|Motherboard: MSI Z97 PC MATE|RAM: Kingston HyperX Blue 8GB(2x4GB)|GPU: Sapphire Nitro R9 380 4GB|PSU: Seasonic M12II EVO 620W Modular|Storage: 1TB WD Blue|Case: NZXT S340 Black|PCIe devices: TP-Link WDN4800| Montior: ASUS VE247H| Others: PS3/PS4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

R9 380 is normally a bit faster, and offer full support of the technologies of AMD, since its a card of GCN 1.2

I also recommend to get the 4GB version.

Spoiler

Main PC: CPU Xeon E3-1231 V3 - MB Asrock B85M Pro3 - RAM 16GB Kingston - GPU GTX 1070 Gainward Phoenix - PSU Corsair AX760i - Monitor  LG 22EA63 - Keyboard Corsair Strafe - Mouse Logitech G402 - Storage 2x3TB WD Green - 240GB OCZ SSD

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you can't always believe what AMD or Nvidia say about cards, Fury X was hyped up to be than 980Ti through all sorts of supposed benchamarks and AMD did well hyping it up to be the best card on the market but we all know how that turned out. Not disagreeing that the 380(285) is pretty much similar to the 960 but you can't always believe what companies say and I would still take a 280X over a 380.

 

The 280X is a more powerful GPU than the 285. However due to the 285's more efficient colour compression its 2GB vram with its 256 bit bus goes further than the 280X's 3GB on its 384 bit bus. This is why whenever people bring up the 960's 128 bit bus I'm sceptical that they have a truly complete enough understanding about all of the technology used to make a remotely informed decision. Deeply sceptical.

 

This goes into why I rolled my eyes at all the screaming of "false advertising" of the 970. These numbers mean sweet fuck all without a whole lot of contextual information that is extremely esoteric and complex. You're much better off ignoring them and looking at actual benchmark results and seeing how it genuinely performs in games and using that as a metric. Then it doesn't matter if you're mistaken about its memory bus, or ROPs or Fury X's dramatically optimistic marketing "statistics".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello!

 

I just ordered this card (the Nitro variant) any thoughts?

 

Was it a good purchase? 

 

Could have the GTX 960 been a better option?

 

 

Thanks guys!  :) 

 

The R9 380 outperforms the GTX 960 by about 10-15% out of the box.

Intel i5-4690K @ 3.8GHz || Gigabyte Z97X-SLI || 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws X 1600MHz || Asus GTX 760 2GB @ 1150 / 6400 || 128GB A-Data SX900 + 1TB Toshiba 7200RPM || Corsair RM650 || Fractal 3500W

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×