Jump to content

Hello guys!

I 'm building a new rig with my friend (his PC) our budget is roughly 630€.

He will play games like LoL,CS GO but he also wants to play gta V and something like the new assassin's creeds.

 

  •     for 190€ (CPU + MOBO) from AMD's side: FX 6300, Gigabyte GA-970-DS3P
  •     for 185€ (CPU + MOBO) from Interl's side: i3-4170, Asrock B85M-DGS

 

so which one should I choose for playing games easier and which one will last longer!?

+I wanna ask if the hypethreaded Dual core (i3) will be acting as quad core in games?

 

Also I wanna know if the Thermaltake SPS-530MPCBEU smart se series 530W CM 87+  is a good PSU. If not, please suggest a PSU at 60€

 

 

**(I 'll be missing for a few hours, cuz i have to go to school i 'll read your posts later, thanks)**

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/380697-new-build-cpu-decision-gaming/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

i3.. i3... i3...,  plz

01101110 01101111 00100000 01101111 01101110 01100101 00100000 01101100 01101111 01110110 01100101 01110011 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101


Main Rig: i7-4790K | Corsair H100i | Asus Z97 | 16GB Ripjaws | 4TB WD Black/512GB SSD | x2 R9 290x | NZXT H440 | HX1000i | 6 Noctuas   [spoiler=SILENT BUILD] Silent build: i5-4460, Be Quiet! Pure Rock, Asrock H97, 8GB HyperX, Samsung 850 Evo 500gb, MSI GTX 970, Be Quiet! Silent Base 800, EVGA Supernova GS 650w 

AMD CPU's. [spoiler=] thats right m8 get 420 no scoped 
Link to post
Share on other sites

Get the i3. Even if that 6300 magically gets to 6GHz, the i3 will still beat it.

 

i3 plz.

In pretty sure a 6ghz fx will beat a Intel dual core locked at 3.2ghz then again that's not happening.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In pretty sure a 6ghz fx will beat a Intel dual core locked at 3.2ghz then again that's not happening.

Not in single core workloads.

Such as gaming.

| Intel i7 5820K @ 4.8GHz | G.Skill Ripjaws 4X4GB | X99 PRO | HoF 980 | Asus MX299Q | Sennheiser HD600 |

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not in single core workloads.

Such as gaming.

 

Are you saying a intel core is double a FX core in single core performance, yes it beats it but you have to smoking some good shit to think it beats it by that much.

 

Also gaming is not a single core workload it's a single to quad core workload just depends how many cores you have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you saying a intel core is double a FX core in single core performance, yes it beats it but you have to smoking some good shit to think it beats it by that much.

 

Also gaming is not a single core workload it's a single to quad core workload just depends how many cores you have.

The i3 is roughly 40% faster than the FX 6300. Increasing clock speed does NOT give a relative speed increase. 

| Intel i7 5820K @ 4.8GHz | G.Skill Ripjaws 4X4GB | X99 PRO | HoF 980 | Asus MX299Q | Sennheiser HD600 |

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please explain why they use the term instructions per CLOCK then.

Oh you mean IPC? Not clock speed?

 

And by that logic, a 3GHz Pentium 4 will perform the same as a 3GHz i3.

Totally irrational.

| Intel i7 5820K @ 4.8GHz | G.Skill Ripjaws 4X4GB | X99 PRO | HoF 980 | Asus MX299Q | Sennheiser HD600 |

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh you mean IPC? Not clock speed?

 

And by that logic, a 3GHz Pentium 4 will perform the same as a 3GHz i3.

Totally irrational.

No I'm referring to CPU performance being measured in IPC if you raise the clock speed you get more instructions more instructions means more computing that all equates to realitive speed increase.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I'm referring to CPU performance being measured in IPC if you raise the clock speed you get more instructions more instructions means more computing that all equates to realitive speed increase.

This is simply fallace.

 

Simplying turning up the clock speed doesn't give relative performance increases.

| Intel i7 5820K @ 4.8GHz | G.Skill Ripjaws 4X4GB | X99 PRO | HoF 980 | Asus MX299Q | Sennheiser HD600 |

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well! That's great because OP is gaming..

/thread

What if I told you games can use 2 more cores than what the i3 has. Honestly playing games on a dual core can work but your frame dips will be horrendous.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What if I told you games can use 2 more cores than what the i3 has. Honestly playing games on a dual core can work but your frame dips will be horrendous.

OP said he wished to play LoL, CS:GO, and GTA 5.

And, the 6300 will stutter aswell.

| Intel i7 5820K @ 4.8GHz | G.Skill Ripjaws 4X4GB | X99 PRO | HoF 980 | Asus MX299Q | Sennheiser HD600 |

Link to post
Share on other sites

So guys which budget CPU wont struggle with these games!? 

What about the PSU I mentioned?

And if I pick the i3 will the PC be able to handle GTA V, ac unity, etc

Honestly having more cores is better in my opinion especially if you ever use rendering.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly having more cores is better in my opinion especially if you ever use rendering.

 

I know these stuff too...

I am just asking if its gonna affect the games! Having the more, but less powerfull cores or having the dual core with hyperthread!?

And the games that "require" quad cores will they be playable with the i3, just this.  ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×