Heaven benchmarks

[Akamii]

So these 2 benchmarks are my r9 285 dual-x oc benchmarks.

 

First one :- AA x4 / Ultra / Tess Extreme / resolution 1366x768 (haven't 1080p monitor)

 

 

Wattage MaX : 103.9W

Temps max : 75C

Fans max : 57%

gpu mem : 900M

 

 

Sec one :- AA x8 / Ultra / Tess Extreme / resolution 1366x768

 

fps min : 8.2

FPS AVG : 54.7

fps max : 124.9

score : 1379

 

Wattage MaX : 103 W

Temps max : 75C

Fans max : 57%

gpu mem : ( forgot to detect it )

 

 

are these benchmarks good and the gpu is fine? and what do you expect for it on 1080p ? the scores/fps i mean ..

is the gpu is fine anyway without problems and good scores? also what about this wattage is that normal?

also note the gpu load was almost 100% and maybe dropped to 0% once or twic , is that due to low resolution ?.

[Akamii]

can anybody answer me? i cant find any benchmarks for this resolution to compare guys.. comon

[AlexWJD]

[Akamii]

wut does that mean? also its valley not heaven

[EpIcPoNaGe]

People more commonly run Valley. Also run the test at a 1080p preset as its easier to compare when the settings are the same. I'll try running heaven in a bit

[EpIcPoNaGe]

So these 2 benchmarks are my r9 285 dual-x oc benchmarks.

 

First one :- AA x4 / Ultra / Tess Extreme / resolution 1366x768 (haven't 1080p monitor)

 

-snip- 

 

are these benchmarks good and the gpu is fine? and what do you expect for it on 1080p ? the scores/fps i mean ..

is the gpu is fine anyway without problems and good scores? also what about this wattage is that normal?

also note the gpu load was almost 100% and maybe dropped to 0% once or twic , is that due to low resolution ?.

 

Heres my score with settings that match your first picture. 

 

 

Take what you will from it as I'm unable to compare your scores to any other scores given that you chose non-preset settings. 

My guess is that your GPU is performing slightly below average.

[Akamii]

People more commonly run Valley. Also run the test at a 1080p preset as its easier to compare when the settings are the same. I'll try running heaven in a bit

"havent 1080p monitor"

[Akamii]

Heres my score with settings that match your first picture. 

 

edf09dde13c732c679016b1402b58900.png

 

Take what you will from it as I'm unable to compare your scores to any other scores given that you chose non-preset settings. 

My guess is that your GPU is performing slightly below average.

well.. idk really but thanks btw gtx 780ti is much higher than r9 285 .

 

anyway here's my passmark score

CPU Passmark : 6218

GPU Passmark 5140

and the website one is

CPU on website : 6452

GPU on website : 5210

 

so i see 200 difference in cpu and 70 difference in gpu .. what do you think ? it doesn't matter that low difference anyway and it depends on luck ? the gpu & cpu are fine or wutsup ?

[EpIcPoNaGe]

"havent 1080p monitor"

I'm pretty sure you can run the test at that resolution even if your Monitor isn't capable.

[EpIcPoNaGe]

well.. idk really but thanks btw gtx 780ti is much higher than r9 285 .

anyway here's my passmark score

CPU Passmark : 6218

GPU Passmark 5140

and the website one is

CPU on website : 6452

GPU on website : 5210

so i see 200 difference in cpu and 70 difference in gpu .. what do you think ? it doesn't matter that low difference anyway and it depends on luck ? the gpu & cpu are fine or wutsup ?

Is never used passmark as a test for comparison. To compare cpu, most compare their Cinebench scores. To compare gpu, they use Valley. To compare both combined, they use firestrike

[Akamii]

I'm pretty sure you can run the test at that resolution even if your Monitor isn't capable.

already tried.

 

Is never used passmark as a test for comparison. To compare cpu, most compare their Cinebench scores. To compare gpu, they use Valley. To compare both combined, they use firestrike

 

well anyway i think u get 110fps because of that gtx 780ti .. it equals gtx 970 ~ 980 or something like r9 290x ye.. i believe

[EpIcPoNaGe]

already tried.

 

 

well anyway i think u get 110fps because of that gtx 780ti .. it equals gtx 970 ~ 980 or something like r9 290x ye.. i believe

 

Well I don't know how else to check the performance of your 285. Try searching online for other people's results at that resolution. 

[xAcid9]

"havent 1080p monitor"

 

Try check your CCC setting.  "My Digital Flat Panels">Properties>Image Scaling Preference. Tick Virtual Super Resolution.

 

Now you should have higher resolution in Heaven Benchmark, only usable on Fullscreen mode. 

[Akamii]

Try check your CCC setting.  "My Digital Flat Panels">Properties>Image Scaling Preference. Tick Virtual Super Resolution.

 

Now you should have higher resolution in Heaven Benchmark, only usable on Fullscreen mode. 

havent any of these

[xAcid9]

havent any of these

 

What is your driver version? You should have this setting in CCC if u're using Catalyst 14.12 (Omega) or newer.

 

You can check in CCC at Information>Software or run GPU-Z.

[Akamii]

What is your driver version? You should have this setting in CCC if u're using Catalyst 14.12 (Omega) or newer.

 

You can check in CCC at Information>Software or run GPU-Z.

i haven't omega because i cant since i use win 8, so im using the CD one which came with the card and its 14.3 , and i cant install the 14.4 on the website because it seems to be the same driver but newer CCC .., also my monitor is lcd vga not digital so all i can see is vga properties and i haven't these options.

[xAcid9]

Y u no update to 8.1?

Too bad then, u're missing some great features.

[xAcid9]

Your cpu bottlenecked that 960 slightly. Have u try both overclocked?

[AlexWJD]

Your cpu bottlenecked that 960 slightly. Have u try both overclocked?

Yeah both are over clocked, my CPU at 4GHz. Dunno why it don't show on valley.

[Akamii]

Y u no update to 8.1?

Too bad then, u're missing some great features.

gonna update soon, btw 8.1 amd driver updates also available on win 7  but win 8 ..

[Akamii]

here's my valley benchmark but still on 768p  

AA x8 , the first picture was 4x and the sec one was 8x 54.7fps which is similiar to the valley results..

 

cant find way to get 1080p

[Tiberiusisgame]

Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong here? Reference clock but the hardware spec should perform better than this. 

 

Unigine Heaven Benchmark 4.0

FPS:

46.9

Score:

1181

Min FPS:

20.8

Max FPS:

63.2

System

Platform:

Windows 7 (build 7601, Service Pack 1) 64bit

CPU model:

Intel® Core i7-4790K CPU @ 4.00GHz (3990MHz) x4

GPU model:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 9.18.13.5012 (4095MB) x1

Settings

Render:

Direct3D11

Mode:

1920x1080 8xAA fullscreen

Preset

Custom

Quality

Ultra

Tessellation:

Extreme

Powered by UNIGINE Engine

Unigine Corp. © 2005-2013

 

[IMPERIUS]

Heres my score with settings that match your first picture.

edf09dde13c732c679016b1402b58900.png

Take what you will from it as I'm unable to compare your scores to any other scores given that you chose non-preset settings.

My guess is that your GPU is performing slightly below average.

Shouldnt gpus of the same model perform almost identical?

[EpIcPoNaGe]

 

Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong here? Reference clock but the hardware spec should perform better than this. 

 

Unigine Heaven Benchmark 4.0

FPS:

46.9

Score:

1181

Min FPS:

20.8

Max FPS:

63.2

System

Platform:

Windows 7 (build 7601, Service Pack 1) 64bit

CPU model:

Intel® Core i7-4790K CPU @ 4.00GHz (3990MHz) x4

GPU model:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 9.18.13.5012 (4095MB) x1

Settings

Render:

Direct3D11

Mode:

1920x1080 8xAA fullscreen

Preset

Custom

Quality

Ultra

Tessellation:

Extreme

Powered by UNIGINE Engine

Unigine Corp. © 2005-2013

 

 

 

It might be best if you started your own thread if you haven't already. You'll get more help specific to you that way. 

 

Shouldnt gpus of the same model perform almost identical?

 

He's running a r9 285 and I'm running a 780 ti.