Jump to content

AMDs x87 floating point instructions suck on FX.

 

SuperPI is very much a legacy single thread benchmark and shouldn't be used to compare gaming performance.

 

uIxt556.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is x87 ?

It's an old instruction set for floating point maths, from the 90s IIRC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is x87 ?

 

 

It's an old instruction set for floating point maths, from the 90s IIRC.

google is your friend:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X87

Desktop: Intel i9-10850K (R9 3900X died 😢 )| MSI Z490 Tomahawk | RTX 2080 (borrowed from work) - MSI GTX 1080 | 64GB 3600MHz CL16 memory | Corsair H100i (NF-F12 fans) | Samsung 970 EVO 512GB | Intel 665p 2TB | Samsung 830 256GB| 3TB HDD | Corsair 450D | Corsair RM550x | MG279Q

Laptop: Surface Pro 7 (i5, 16GB RAM, 256GB SSD)

Console: PlayStation 4 Pro

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, why there is  a huge difference? Intel 9 seconds AMD 22 seconds?

Because AMDs implementation of x87 instructions isn't very good: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?286448-The-Book-of-Bulldozer-Revelations-Episode-2-%28SuperPI-x87%29

 

But you shouldn't care, SuperPI isn't the best way of measuring CPU performance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because AMDs implementation of x87 instructions isn't very good: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?286448-The-Book-of-Bulldozer-Revelations-Episode-2-%28SuperPI-x87%29

 

But you shouldn't care, SuperPI isn't the best way of measuring CPU performance.

ok..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×