Jump to content

I have never tried setting different core ratios on my cpu and kept them all at the same multipliers, but it is easy to get one core running incredibly fast if I keep the rest of the cores downclocked? For example should I easily be able to hit 5.2ghz one core one and have core 2-4 sitting at 2.8 ghz stable on a 4790k? Or is that all too difficult for an amateur overclocker because more complicated things are involved. 

Ryzen 3700x -Evga RTX 2080 Super- Msi x570 Gaming Edge - G.Skill Ripjaws 3600Mhz RAM - EVGA SuperNova G3 750W -500gb 970 Evo - 250Gb Samsung 850 Evo - 250Gb Samsung 840 Evo  - 4Tb WD Blue- NZXT h500 - ROG Swift PG348Q

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/256131-different-core-multipliers/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

basically, no, because you'll need a higher voltage to hit that speed and while heat does increase proportionally with speed, it increased proportionally to voltage squared. 20% increase in voltage is 44% increase in heat. Overclocking limits are more closely tied to voltage causing more heat output than actual clock speed causing heat output.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never tried setting different core ratios on my cpu and kept them all at the same multipliers, but it is easy to get one core running incredibly fast if I keep the rest of the cores downclocked? For example should I easily be able to hit 5.2ghz one core one and have core 2-4 sitting at 2.8 ghz stable on a 4790k? Or is that all too difficult for an amateur overclocker because more complicated things are involved. 

Not really, if all the cores can't hit a certain frequency there's only a small chance that one core will. There are some times that this works, like when they hit 8.6GHz on two cores of an FX-8350, but that's liquid nitrogen shit

"Rawr XD"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never tried setting different core ratios on my cpu and kept them all at the same multipliers, but it is easy to get one core running incredibly fast if I keep the rest of the cores downclocked? For example should I easily be able to hit 5.2ghz one core one and have core 2-4 sitting at 2.8 ghz stable on a 4790k? Or is that all too difficult for an amateur overclocker because more complicated things are involved.

X99 will let you do that and you'd be abble to cherry pick your best core and push it...but with Z97 it's random core taken so chances are you won,t be able to push it more.

| CPU: Core i7-8700K @ 4.89ghz - 1.21v  Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING  CPU Cooler: Corsair H100i V2 |
| GPU: MSI RTX 3080Ti Ventus 3X OC  RAM: 32GB T-Force Delta RGB 3066mhz |
| Displays: Acer Predator XB270HU 1440p Gsync 144hz IPS Gaming monitor | Oculus Quest 3 VR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alrighty thanks for the replies. Just making sure, I was hoping to see what I could squeeze out of single threaded games that ran like poo by having a profile. You dream crushers  :(

Ryzen 3700x -Evga RTX 2080 Super- Msi x570 Gaming Edge - G.Skill Ripjaws 3600Mhz RAM - EVGA SuperNova G3 750W -500gb 970 Evo - 250Gb Samsung 850 Evo - 250Gb Samsung 840 Evo  - 4Tb WD Blue- NZXT h500 - ROG Swift PG348Q

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×