Math

[Laurysss]

So we have a rectangle

 

And we need to cut it one time and when put together the 2 parts of rectangle we have to get a square. Any ideas?

[LukaP]

So we have a rectangle

 

 

And we need to cut it one time and when put together the 2 parts of rectangle we have to get a square. Any ideas?

cut it so you get a square on one part of it. put the other part over it, so that it comes right to the edge. ????? profit

[KamiKatze]

The image is blank?

 

If it's orthogonal in one angle, cut the rectangle in half at that angle. Then lay the New hypotenuses togehter........ Profit!

[Laurysss]

cut it so you get a square on one part of it. put the other part over it, so that it comes right to the edge. ????? profit

I dont remember the full thing ..

[LukaP]

I dont remember the full thing ..

the full thing? just do it to the rectangle you posted like i said

[LukaP]

The image is blank?

 

If it's orthogonal in one angle, cut the rectangle in half at that angle. Then lay the New hypotenuses togehter........ Profit!

youre thinking triangles

[KamiKatze]

youre thinking triangles

 

Oh... wow... i suck.

[LukaP]

Oh... wow... i suck.

and even then it only works if the shorter sides are the same lenght. otherwise, your newly made hypothenuses dont match up

[Laurysss]

the full thing? just do it to the rectangle you posted like i said

Its not supossed to be like that. Tomorow i will ask my teacher the full thing. Or maybe not because shes a bitch.....

[LukaP]

Its not supossed to be like that. Tomorow i will ask my teacher the full thing. Or maybe not because shes a bitch.....

show the entire task. maybe ill get an idea what she wants

[bucknasty68]

Given a rectangle of sides 64 by 81 (= 8² by 9²) we can dissect it into two pieces that can be moved without rotation or turning over to form a square of side 72 (= 8×9) by 15 cuts parallel to the edges. The cuts must be in staircase formation as shown here, where the small component cells are of size 8×9. This is a general method that works for any rectangle q² by (q+1)² to form a square of side q(q+1) in two pieces using 2q – 1 cuts in staircase formation.

 

 

Does this work?

[LukaP]

By cuts parallel to the edges, no pieces being turned over, transform two squares of sides 3 and 4 into one square of side 5 using 4 pieces, one of which is a unit square. There are two distinct solutions.

Given a rectangle of sides 64 by 81 (= 8² by 9²) we can dissect it into two pieces that can be moved without rotation or turning over to form a square of side 72 (= 8×9) by 15 cuts parallel to the edges. The cuts must be in staircase formation as shown here, where the small component cells are of size 8×9. This is a general method that works for any rectangle q² by (q+1)² to form a square of side q(q+1) in two pieces using 2q – 1 cuts in staircase formation.

 

 

Does this work?

if the cut like that is allowed. its the only option i can see right now