Opinions/Comments needed - Latency and Frames.

[ZerueLX11]

Hello!

 

So I just wanted a few opinions of Latency and frame times.

 

 

I bought a Avermedia ExtremeCap U3 which utilizes USB 3.0 to transfer uncompressed video to the screen. I will be using this with the ROG Swift since the swift only has ONE DisplayPort; obviously  consoles ( In this case an xbox360 ) do not utilize the glorious DisplayPort. 

 

Currently I have the BENQ XL2420T 120Hz monitor and I have my setup like this...

 

Xbox360 --HDMI--> Avermedia ExtremeCap U3 -- USB 3.0--> Computer --> Rec Central Software --> Displays to Screen

 

 

Avermedia says Rec Central will display the video output with almost no latency, and I found up recently that while playing through Rec Central there is a 3 Frame lag time.

 

If my math is correct

 

Consoles "do" 30fps or 60fps. 

 

At 30fps: 1second / 30Frames = 0.03_ s/Frame          |   0.03_ * 3  =  0.1 seconds == 100ms

At 60fps: 1second / 60Frames =  0.016_  s/Frame      |   0.05_ * 3 = 0.05 seconds == 50ms

 

 

So I was wondering if a latency of 50ms and 100ms is of any concern. 

 

This is very opinion based and just like how some people struggle to see 60Hz or 120Hz I want to know other peoples experiences with this type of lag time. I personally don't think I notice any lag time, but the though of it comes to my mind every so often. The BENQ I have is already low latency 5ms( 2ms GTG ) and the ROG Swift claims 1ms so would the make the issues of latency lower overall? 

 

Thanks for your opinions and comments, very interested to read them!

[Nineshadow]

Fps is frames per seconds,not seconds per frames.Not like this matters too much,but hey

[Woohoo]

@Nineshadow But 30FPS equals 1second / 30frames like OP said.

[ZerueLX11]

Fps is frames per seconds,not seconds per frames.Not like this matters too much,but hey

seconds per Frame calculates the number of seconds it takes for 1 frame to be displayed. In this case it takes lets say for 60fps, it takes .016_( ~16ms ) seconds to display one frame.

[Nineshadow]

seconds per Frame calculates the number of seconds it takes for 1 frame to be displayed. In this case it takes lets say for 60fps, it takes .016_( ~16ms ) seconds to display one frame.

I'm not retarded you know.

[ZerueLX11]

I'm not retarded you know.

 

I never said you were, but I was a bit confused when you said "Fps is frames per seconds,not seconds per frames". Was I not very clear when differentiating between the two when displaying my data?