New build solely for game testing
Honestly decent build, though I'd fix the RAM issue, you can buy significantly lower latency ram than you currently have, either CL30 6000Mhz or what I have on my slightly altered list,
you also probably want a better motherboard, while the one you have isn't bad it's nothing great,
the Gigabyte A620M Gaming X AX has: 5+2+2 power design
The MSI B650-S WIFI has: 12+2+1 power design (which is overkill, but why should you get stuck on weaker MB on already overkill build?)
The MSI also has 2 8pin power connectors for CPU instead of one, despite the current AM5 only needing one it's a nice to have and maybe contributes for more fluid power management? (I might be making this last part up)
And finally SSD, I included slightly more expensive NVME that should be more worth it's price, the P3 Plus isn't anything slow, but they do tend to fall back in sequential tasks that handle large files, regardless of their rated speed.
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D 4.4 GHz 12-Core Processor ($469.90 @ Amazon)
CPU Cooler: ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III A-RGB 69.9 CFM Liquid CPU Cooler ($149.99 @ Amazon)
Motherboard: MSI PRO B650-S WIFI ATX AM5 Motherboard ($139.00 @ MSI)
Memory: *Mushkin Enhanced Redline 64 GB (2 x 32 GB) DDR5-5600 CL28 Memory ($179.99 @ Newegg)
Storage: Western Digital Blue SN580 1 TB M.2-2280 PCIe 4.0 X4 NVME Solid State Drive ($74.00 @ iBUYPOWER)
Storage: Seagate BarraCuda Pro 4 TB 3.5" 7200 RPM Internal Hard Drive ($0.00)
Storage: Western Digital VelociRaptor 1 TB 2.5" 10000 RPM Internal Hard Drive ($0.00)
Video Card: Gigabyte WINDFORCE V2 GeForce RTX 4090 24 GB Video Card ($1699.99 @ Newegg)
Case: Thermaltake Core P3 ATX Mid Tower Case ($74.98 @ Amazon)
Power Supply: be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 1200 W 80+ Gold Certified Fully Modular ATX Power Supply ($149.90 @ Amazon)
Total: $2937.75
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
*Lowest price parts chosen from parametric criteria
Generated by PCPartPicker 2024-04-25 08:57 EDT-0400
I'd also recommend you reconsider getting 7800x3D instead,
because 7900x3D uses a chip design that only holds the 3D cache for half of the chip:
And while some benchmarks benefit from faster and more core packed 7900x3D, the 7800x3D can win in others:
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now