Jump to content

3.5ghz processor vs 3.3ghz processor?

Go to solution Solved by ulookuglynoob,

So pretty much to sum all of it up, just tell your son that he meets the recommended specs, and his processor is much better than the recommended one. No need to upgrade anything.

Not sure if this belongs here or not but anyway...

 

My son is looking to buy a flight sim game (xplane 11) and when he checked on can you run it it said he met the minimum requirements but not the recommended. The recommended processor is an i5-6600k and he has an i3-12100f. Would that 0.2ghz really make any difference? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Clock speed isn't that important, what matters more in this case is how much work it can do per cycle. A 12100F can do more work per cycle than a 6600K, even with that clock speed deficit.

 

That's why a 3.4GHz Pentium D can get absolutely curbstomped by a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo.

Main rig on profile

VAULT - File Server

Spoiler

Intel Core i5 11400 w/ Shadow Rock LP, 2x16GB SP GAMING 3200MHz CL16, ASUS PRIME Z590-A, 2x LSI 9211-8i, Fractal Define 7, 256GB Team MP33, 3x 6TB WD Red Pro (general storage), 3x 1TB Seagate Barracuda (dumping ground), 3x 8TB WD White-Label (Plex) (all 3 arrays in their respective Windows Parity storage spaces), Corsair RM750x, Windows 11 Education

Sleeper HP Pavilion A6137C

Spoiler

Intel Core i7 6700K @ 4.4GHz, 4x8GB G.SKILL Ares 1800MHz CL10, ASUS Z170M-E D3, 128GB Team MP33, 1TB Seagate Barracuda, 320GB Samsung Spinpoint (for video capture), MSI GTX 970 100ME, EVGA 650G1, Windows 10 Pro

Mac Mini (Late 2020)

Spoiler

Apple M1, 8GB RAM, 256GB, macOS Sonoma

Consoles: Softmodded 1.4 Xbox w/ 500GB HDD, Xbox 360 Elite 120GB Falcon, XB1X w/2TB MX500, Xbox Series X, PS1 1001, PS2 Slim 70000 w/ FreeMcBoot, PS4 Pro 7015B 1TB (retired), PS5 Digital, Nintendo Switch OLED, Nintendo Wii RVL-001 (black)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Nibbets said:

Not sure if this belongs here or not but anyway...

 

My son is looking to buy a flight sim game (xplane 11) and when he checked on can you run it it said he met the minimum requirements but not the recommended. The recommended processor is an i5-6600k and he has an i3-12100f. Would that 0.2ghz really make any difference? 

The 12100 is better than an old 6600k, sure clock speed is a bit lower but IPC is way better, resulting in moaar powwwaaaa 🙂

 

System : AMD R9 5900X / Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO/ 2x16GB Corsair Vengeance 3600CL18 ASUS TUF Gaming AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX OC Edition GPU/ Phanteks P600S case /  Eisbaer 280mm AIO (with 2xArctic P14 fans) / 2TB Crucial T500  NVme + 2TB WD SN850 NVme + 4TB Toshiba X300 HDD drives/ Corsair RM850x PSU/  Alienware AW3420DW 34" 120Hz 3440x1440p monitor / Logitech G915TKL keyboard (wireless) / Logitech G PRO X Superlight mouse / Audeze Maxwell headphones

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

No. the 12100f is a very capable CPU. the clock speeds aren't the only thing that matters. The 12100f will outperform the 6600k by about 30 percent. keep the 12100f. also, the words "i3" and "i5" don't matter as much as the CPU generation. the 6600k is 6th gen, while the i3 12100f is 12th gen. the 12100f will definitely be a lot better than the 6600k.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Nibbets said:

Not sure if this belongs here or not but anyway...

 

My son is looking to buy a flight sim game (xplane 11) and when he checked on can you run it it said he met the minimum requirements but not the recommended. The recommended processor is an i5-6600k and he has an i3-12100f. Would that 0.2ghz really make any difference? 

the 6600k is up to 3.9ghz, the 12100f is up to 4.3 ghz, even if the 12100f was running at a lower freq than a 6600k, it would absolutely destroy it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Nibbets said:

Not sure if this belongs here or not but anyway...

 

My son is looking to buy a flight sim game (xplane 11) and when he checked on can you run it it said he met the minimum requirements but not the recommended. The recommended processor is an i5-6600k and he has an i3-12100f. Would that 0.2ghz really make any difference? 

37 minutes ago, flibberdipper said:

Clock speed isn't that important, what matters more in this case is how much work it can do per cycle. A 12100F can do more work per cycle than a 6600K, even with that clock speed deficit.

 

That's why a 3.4GHz Pentium D can get absolutely curbstomped by a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo.

^ this

 

Its more complex than just clock speed when looking across architectures/lithography. The transistors per core between a 6600k and 12100f aren't the same too, nor is the IPC as fibberdipper mentions. The architecture and how effectively it uses that clock speed aren't  the same.

 

Its almost always better to go with newer architecture over older architecture, especially if we're talking anything before 12th gen Intel or Ryzen 3000.

 

Intel Core i3-14100 vs Intel Core i7-7700K Benchmark, comparison and differences (cpu-monkey.com)

 

Just looking at Cinebench R23 scores, which generally doesn't care for the extra cache the 14100 has nor higher memory bandwidth, its about 50% more performance in both single and multi thread performance. I intentionally used the more powerful 7700k as an example here too.

Ryzen 7950x3D PBO +200MHz / -15mV curve CPPC in 'prefer cache'

RTX 4090 @133%/+230/+1000

Builder/Enthusiast/Overclocker since 2012  //  Professional since 2017

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

So pretty much to sum all of it up, just tell your son that he meets the recommended specs, and his processor is much better than the recommended one. No need to upgrade anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you everyone. I was pretty sure he'd be fine with what he has but I wanted to double check.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

please mark the solution by clicking the green check mark under the post. It really helps us get help to people who need it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need go really low clock to actually start see diference in games. You won't see difrence even 5 Ghz vs 4 Ghz with same CPU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×