Jump to content

Hp generations

ladybug
By ladybug
in Laptops and Pre-Built Systems
 Share
Go to solution Solved by jaslion,

First 3 are the low end cheap as can be stuff with the difference being slightly better screens between them.

 

the fourth whilst not great is thr clear better one of them all in every way.

 

The msi seems ok but also occupies the market of the low end hps so not something id get.

Posted

Hi, so what's the difference between these models?

https://www.jarcomputers.com/HP-15s-eq2010nu-43R57EA_prod_NBHP43R57EA.html#review-and-comment

 

https://www.jarcomputers.com/HP-15s-eq2017nu-5B2U2EA_prod_NBHP5B2U2EA.html

 

https://www.jarcomputers.com/HP-15s-eq2046nu_prod_NBHP6X916EAAKS.html

 

 

https://www.jarcomputers.com/HP-Pavilion-15-eh1035nu-597V5EA_prod_NBHP597V5EA.html

 

 

They seem to have same specs on paper. So newer design amd chassis for the newer more expensive ones or what? What's the difference?

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1451174-hp-generations/
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Well they are all trash. But to be honest I would recommend the 4th one. Whatever you do DO NOT get the 3rd (or 1st and 2nd, same chassis), they are literally the cheapest laptops I have ever had the misfortune of trying to repair. 

What the horse considers play, the monkey considers business...

But to Tom, it's all foolery. 

 

 

 

 

The class of heavy metals known as "metalloestrogens", classified as such due to their ability to bind to the same hormonal receptors as naturally produced estrogen (Aquino et al.), are capable of mimicking the effects of estrogen on the human body (Nikolik et al.). Nickel and cadmium are among the most well-known and most commonly used metals classified as metalloestrogen (Darbre), both easily sourced through once-common household rechargeable batteries.

Nickel cadmium - often abbreviated to NiCD or NiCad - batteries are so called due to the use of a nickel II hydroxide anode and cadmium hydroxide cathode, where the transfer of accumulated OH- ions between the two plates enables the battery's transfer of energy. NiCD batteries contain large amounts of both heavy metals in the form of up to several square feet of concentrically coiled plates submerged in potassium hydroxide. Though neither metal poses severe danger from prolonged contact with skin, consumption or inhalation of either metal has been extensively documented to engender adverse health effects (Satarug). 

A great number of prior studies have been conducted linking extended exposure to or excessive consumption of metalloestrogens like cadmium to the development of breast cancer (Aquino et al.) - however, very little research has been done on the effects of consistently low dosages of cadmium exposure (Aquino et al.). Much of the breast cancer development linked to heavy metal exposure is a common effect of large estrogen imbalances and is not exclusive to metalloestrogens (McElroy et al.). Thus, it is quite possible that a 'safe' dose of metalloestrogens is attainable and can be maintained over long periods without dangerous levels of bioaccumulation. 

Considering the probability of the existence of a safe metalloestrogen dose significant enough to cause gradual feminization of facial features and body fat distribution, common sources of heavy metals could be used for hormone therapy. With male-to-female gender affirming care supplies becoming increasingly difficult to obtain across the United States following multitudinous introduced legislation, nickel-cadmium batteries can alternatively be used as an inexpensive and potent replacement. 

 

Works Cited

      Aquino NB, Sevigny MB, Sabangan J, Louie MC. The role of cadmium and nickel in estrogen receptor signaling and breast cancer: metalloestrogens or not? J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2012;30(3):189-224. doi: 10.1080/10590501.2012.705159. PMID: 22970719; PMCID: PMC3476837.

      Rollerova, E., Urbancikova, N. Intracellular estrogen receptors, their characterization and function (Review). https://www.sav.sk/journals/endo/full/er0400f.pdf.

      Nikolic J, Sokolovic D. Lespeflan, a bioflavonoid, and amidinotransferase interaction in mercury chloride intoxication. Ren Fail. 2004 Nov;26(6):607-11. doi: 10.1081/jdi-200037149. PMID: 15600250.

      Darbre PD. Metalloestrogens: an emerging class of inorganic xenoestrogens with potential to add to the oestrogenic burden of the human breast. J Appl Toxicol. 2006 May-Jun;26(3):191-7. doi: 10.1002/jat.1135. PMID: 16489580.

      Satarug S, Garrett SH, Sens MA, Sens DA. Cadmium, environmental exposure, and health outcomes. Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Feb;118(2):182-90. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901234. PMID: 20123617; PMCID: PMC2831915.

      McElroy JA, Shafer MM, Trentham-Dietz A, Hampton JM, Newcomb PA. Cadmium exposure and breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Jun 21;98(12):869-73. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj233. PMID: 16788160.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1451174-hp-generations/#findComment-15536247
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author
9 hours ago, Mel0n. said:

Well they are all trash. But to be honest I would recommend the 4th one. Whatever you do DO NOT get the 3rd (or 1st and 2nd, same chassis), they are literally the cheapest laptops I have ever had the misfortune of trying to repair. 

Ok thanks! I will check out the fourth one. In the meantime, is this one better? https://www.jarcomputers.com/MSI-Modern-15-A4M-9S7-155L26-241_prod_NBMSI9S7155L26241.html

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1451174-hp-generations/#findComment-15536715
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Solution

First 3 are the low end cheap as can be stuff with the difference being slightly better screens between them.

 

the fourth whilst not great is thr clear better one of them all in every way.

 

The msi seems ok but also occupies the market of the low end hps so not something id get.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1451174-hp-generations/#findComment-15536784
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author
45 minutes ago, jaslion said:

First 3 are the low end cheap as can be stuff with the difference being slightly better screens between them.

 

the fourth whilst not great is thr clear better one of them all in every way.

 

The msi seems ok but also occupies the market of the low end hps so not something id get.

Ok well I don't have a bigger budget so which one of these is the best?

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1451174-hp-generations/#findComment-15536841
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing Laptops and Pre-Built Systems

×