Jump to content

Bro you serious?!

Go to solution Solved by GoodBytes,
1 hour ago, Themfolks said:

I just read today that Microsoft has dropped TPM requirement already. Thanks for the info, though I'll check it out.

No. Microsoft will not drop TPM 2.0. Supported CPU may reduce to older chips, depending on the cash and performance analytics collected from Insiders. But TPM 2.0 WILL BE (at release) a hard requirement to install Windows 11. This is not a problem for any system for many years. They all have TPM 2.0 chips or firmware level TPM equivalent (which is fine by Microsoft). Microsoft wants to take advantage of TPM 2.0 to improve the OS security. While the code base technically support system without TPM 2.0 as it is based on Windows 8 and 10, the install will check for that. Now, knowing Microsoft, you can bet it will be easy to by-pass. Microsoft doesn't really care. It is more for OEMs and wants to push DIY builders to have it enabled by default. The big issue isn't with OEMs. It is more with DIY systems, where motherboard manufacture, for some reason, set it to disable.

 

So anyways, the restriction is not set for Insider builds of Windows 11. But it will be once released.

Therefore, you have the warning, but you still have the button "Get Started". But anyways, in your case, as mentioned, you have TPM 2.0 in firmware form (fTPM). So it's all good.

 

Bro how on Earth does my PC not meet the minimum hardware requirements for Windows 11?! Bro wtf?

 

MOBO: ASUS ROG STRIX-B450-E GAMING

CPU: Ryzen 5 2600 @3.81Ghz

RAM: G.SKILL 16GB 3000Mhz CL14

GRAPHICS CARD: ASUS RTX2060 6GB

SSD: Samsung 970 Evo Plus

PSU: 800W Gold Certified

 

MISC: 

1GBPS Ethernet, Intel M.2 SATA Wifi/Bluetooth card, 2 HDD's and my Windows 10 is fully updated to the latest version, including optional updates (as of 2021 July 2nd)...

 

Microsoft, please don't pull another Windows Vista...please...

 

76f.png

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1352736-bro-you-serious/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You prolly don't have Secure Boot enabled or TPM enabled. I suggest looking at the official thread of Windows 11.

https://github.com/rcmaehl/WhyNotWin11/releases/tag/1.0.2

Run this and see which of those it is. 

What the horse considers play, the monkey considers business...

But to Tom, it's all foolery. 

 

 

 

 

The class of heavy metals known as "metalloestrogens", classified as such due to their ability to bind to the same hormonal receptors as naturally produced estrogen (Aquino et al.), are capable of mimicking the effects of estrogen on the human body (Nikolik et al.). Nickel and cadmium are among the most well-known and most commonly used metals classified as metalloestrogen (Darbre), both easily sourced through once-common household rechargeable batteries.

Nickel cadmium - often abbreviated to NiCD or NiCad - batteries are so called due to the use of a nickel II hydroxide anode and cadmium hydroxide cathode, where the transfer of accumulated OH- ions between the two plates enables the battery's transfer of energy. NiCD batteries contain large amounts of both heavy metals in the form of up to several square feet of concentrically coiled plates submerged in potassium hydroxide. Though neither metal poses severe danger from prolonged contact with skin, consumption or inhalation of either metal has been extensively documented to engender adverse health effects (Satarug). 

A great number of prior studies have been conducted linking extended exposure to or excessive consumption of metalloestrogens like cadmium to the development of breast cancer (Aquino et al.) - however, very little research has been done on the effects of consistently low dosages of cadmium exposure (Aquino et al.). Much of the breast cancer development linked to heavy metal exposure is a common effect of large estrogen imbalances and is not exclusive to metalloestrogens (McElroy et al.). Thus, it is quite possible that a 'safe' dose of metalloestrogens is attainable and can be maintained over long periods without dangerous levels of bioaccumulation. 

Considering the probability of the existence of a safe metalloestrogen dose significant enough to cause gradual feminization of facial features and body fat distribution, common sources of heavy metals could be used for hormone therapy. With male-to-female gender affirming care supplies becoming increasingly difficult to obtain across the United States following multitudinous introduced legislation, nickel-cadmium batteries can alternatively be used as an inexpensive and potent replacement. 

 

Works Cited

      Aquino NB, Sevigny MB, Sabangan J, Louie MC. The role of cadmium and nickel in estrogen receptor signaling and breast cancer: metalloestrogens or not? J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2012;30(3):189-224. doi: 10.1080/10590501.2012.705159. PMID: 22970719; PMCID: PMC3476837.

      Rollerova, E., Urbancikova, N. Intracellular estrogen receptors, their characterization and function (Review). https://www.sav.sk/journals/endo/full/er0400f.pdf.

      Nikolic J, Sokolovic D. Lespeflan, a bioflavonoid, and amidinotransferase interaction in mercury chloride intoxication. Ren Fail. 2004 Nov;26(6):607-11. doi: 10.1081/jdi-200037149. PMID: 15600250.

      Darbre PD. Metalloestrogens: an emerging class of inorganic xenoestrogens with potential to add to the oestrogenic burden of the human breast. J Appl Toxicol. 2006 May-Jun;26(3):191-7. doi: 10.1002/jat.1135. PMID: 16489580.

      Satarug S, Garrett SH, Sens MA, Sens DA. Cadmium, environmental exposure, and health outcomes. Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Feb;118(2):182-90. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901234. PMID: 20123617; PMCID: PMC2831915.

      McElroy JA, Shafer MM, Trentham-Dietz A, Hampton JM, Newcomb PA. Cadmium exposure and breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Jun 21;98(12):869-73. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj233. PMID: 16788160.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1352736-bro-you-serious/#findComment-14844309
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Mel0nMan said:

You prolly don't have Secure Boot enabled or TPM enabled. I suggest looking at the official thread of Windows 11.

https://github.com/rcmaehl/WhyNotWin11/releases/tag/1.0.2

Run this and see which of those it is. 

I just read today that Microsoft has dropped TPM requirement already. Thanks for the info, though I'll check it out.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1352736-bro-you-serious/#findComment-14844311
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Themfolks said:

I just read today that Microsoft has dropped TPM requirement already. Thanks for the info, though I'll check it out.

No. Microsoft will not drop TPM 2.0. Supported CPU may reduce to older chips, depending on the cash and performance analytics collected from Insiders. But TPM 2.0 WILL BE (at release) a hard requirement to install Windows 11. This is not a problem for any system for many years. They all have TPM 2.0 chips or firmware level TPM equivalent (which is fine by Microsoft). Microsoft wants to take advantage of TPM 2.0 to improve the OS security. While the code base technically support system without TPM 2.0 as it is based on Windows 8 and 10, the install will check for that. Now, knowing Microsoft, you can bet it will be easy to by-pass. Microsoft doesn't really care. It is more for OEMs and wants to push DIY builders to have it enabled by default. The big issue isn't with OEMs. It is more with DIY systems, where motherboard manufacture, for some reason, set it to disable.

 

So anyways, the restriction is not set for Insider builds of Windows 11. But it will be once released.

Therefore, you have the warning, but you still have the button "Get Started". But anyways, in your case, as mentioned, you have TPM 2.0 in firmware form (fTPM). So it's all good.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1352736-bro-you-serious/#findComment-14844465
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×