Jump to content

invoke webrequest vs smb  

2 members have voted

  1. 1. I am looking at how to efficiently transfer between two remote servers they will be firewalled to each other so the security of the method is not an issue (If I am missing something security wise please say). Which would be better  invoke webrequest or a networked drive?

    • invoke webrequest
      0
    • networked drive
      2


I am looking at how to efficiently transfer between two remote servers they will be firewalled to each other so the security of the method is not an issue (If I am missing something security wise please say). Which would be better  invoke webrequest or a networked drive?

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1315855-invoke-webrequest-vs-smb/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neither to be honest. Though between the two, a networked drive would be better, I always found that invoke-webrequest is incredibly slow.

 

Robocopy would be a better option due to its multi threaded nature, though it's still going over SMB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Oshino Shinobu said:

Neither to be honest. Though between the two, a networked drive would be better, I always found that invoke-webrequest is incredibly slow.

 

Robocopy would be a better option due to its multi threaded nature, though it's still going over SMB.

thank you yes robocopy is an option we are considering if we use the networked drive

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×