200fps Minecraft

[Nubsical]

Hey guys so I recently built a pc with an i9 9900k with 16gb of 3600mhz memory. The only thing is I am using integrated graphics as I will get the 3080 next year. Anyways, in the mean time I decided I would be playing minecraft because I heard it was a cpu intensive game. But when I went in, I only got around 200fps. Now for minecraft, this is pretty slow for my specs. When I see youtube videos with ppl who have worse specs than me but a better graphics card, then they get around 600-1000 fps. Is there something I am doing wrong?

 

- overclocked cpu to 5 ghz

-turned framerate to unlimited

-80% of integrated graphics being used

[eeeee1]

600 - 1000? what are they running? i9 10900k at 99999 ghz and a ln2 cooled rtx 3090? I would lean towards saying that this is impossible on anything but the loading screen. 

11 minutes ago, FireBoyAwesome said:

-80% of integrated graphics being used

? make sure your gpu is selected in geforce control panel

[Moonzy]

18 minutes ago, eeeee1 said:

make sure your gpu is selected in geforce control panel

they dont have one

30 minutes ago, FireBoyAwesome said:

The only thing is I am using integrated graphics as I will get the 3080 next year.

 

 

i would say 200fps is probably the limit of the iGPU? idk

[eeeee1]

Just now, Moonzy said:

they dont have one

 

 

i would say 200fps is probably the limit of the iGPU? idk

damn i cant read. gotta hit up the local kindergarten again.

[Praesi]

1000fps..rofl.

 

What Monitor do you use? 60Hz?

[DefineOutside]

Try optifine for legacy versions such as 1.8 and 1.12, while Sodium is good for newer versions of the game such as 1.16.  200 fps sounds about right for integrated graphics.

[Morrie Sells Wigs]

Sorry, but why does anyone need more than 200fps?

 

Do you think you can tell the difference between 200 and 250?

 

What about 200 and 300?

 

600fps in minecraft is not necessary as 200 will be more than enough. 

 

Can the human eye even distinguish between frame rates that high?

 

Once you jump from 30 to 60, yes it is obvious  - and 60 to 100 is obvious too.

 

But can you really say it is noticeable, and worth the extra time, hassle, or even expense, to attain those extra frames once you are talking about the difference between 200 and 300, or 400, or even 600?