Pc 39 sec boot time

[SLOTHINSPACE]

So i have a expensive pc with a m.2 i9 cpu ect enabled fast boot and turned alot of start up programs i would think my pc should boot faster, any options of things i could changed would be good. Just to note im running bios version F5 on my Aorus gaming 9 i do not want to update my bios as there is nothing wrong with it.

Specs

i9 7990x

gtx 180t9

samsung 970 evo m.2

32gb of ddr4 2400mhz ram

aorus gaming 9

[.Apex.]

are you counting from when you see the Windows logo or once you press the power button?

[SLOTHINSPACE]

Just now, Syn. said:

are you counting from when you see the Windows logo or once you press the power button?

from pressing the power button to windows lock screen

 

[.Apex.]

1 minute ago, SLOTHINSPACE said:

from pressing the power button to windows lock screen

 

then that's normal, the BIOS post screen takes up a lot of that time

[SLOTHINSPACE]

Just now, Syn. said:

then that's normal, the BIOS post screen takes up a lot of that time

yes the bios does take a while to boot up once windows starts to boot takes around 5 seconds

 

[Naijin]

20 minutes ago, SLOTHINSPACE said:

So i have a expensive pc with a m.2 i9 cpu ect enabled fast boot and turned alot of start up programs i would think my pc should boot faster, any options of things i could changed would be good. Just to note im running bios version F5 on my Aorus gaming 9 i do not want to update my bios as there is nothing wrong with it.

Specs

i9 7990x

gtx 180t9

samsung 970 evo m.2

32gb of ddr4 2400mhz ram

aorus gaming 9

If you're using an i9 7900x and an X299 chipset, yes they can take a while to POST. Most of those high end consumer chipsets do, same as the Threadripper systems. If your motherboard has debug numbers, you could have a look at those and see at what numbers it is slow.

[.Apex.]

1 minute ago, SLOTHINSPACE said:

yes the bios does take a while to boot up once windows starts to boot takes around 5 seconds

 

there doesn't seem to be an option to decrease the BIOS post screen time as far as I can tell, but it isn't related to your SSD, X299 Motherboards take longer to post because the chipset is more sophisticated, though a BIOS update might help.

[suedseefrucht]

For my mainboard there is fast boot and MSI fast boot.
My boot time is < 10 seconds.
You can see my build down below in my signature.

[SLOTHINSPACE]

3 minutes ago, Syn. said:

there doesn't seem to be an option to decrease the BIOS post screen time as far as I can tell, but it isn't related to your SSD, X299 Motherboards take longer to post because the chipset is more sophisticated, though a BIOS update might help.

Thanks for the imformation yes it does go though the debug codes thats does take a while 40 secs is not a problem just wondered if thats something that could be better, as my friend has a lower end pc and boots alot faster

[SLOTHINSPACE]

1 minute ago, suedseefrucht said:

For my mainboard there is fast boot and MSI fast boot.
My boot time is < 10 seconds.
You can see my build down below in my signature.

Maybe this is because of my chipset on my board for the reason why my boot time is nearly 4x longer 

[suedseefrucht]

Just now, SLOTHINSPACE said:

Maybe this is because of my chipset on my board for the reason why my boot time is nearly 4x longer 

Did yo ucheck your boot order? Make sure your ssd is the first entry so your system doesn't wait for other boot devices to be there.

[SLOTHINSPACE]

2 minutes ago, suedseefrucht said:

Did yo ucheck your boot order? Make sure your ssd is the first entry so your system doesn't wait for other boot devices to be there.

i will have to check but from my understand it says windows boot something then my m.2 under boot priority, has to boot to m.2 as thats the only drive to have windows on it i guess

 

[SLOTHINSPACE]

12 minutes ago, Syn. said:

there doesn't seem to be an option to decrease the BIOS post screen time as far as I can tell, but it isn't related to your SSD, X299 Motherboards take longer to post because the chipset is more sophisticated, though a BIOS update might help.

You suggest a bios update never done it as is seen to only do if a problem happens and could make problems if i do it 

[suedseefrucht]

5 minutes ago, SLOTHINSPACE said:

i will have to check but from my understand it says windows boot something then my m.2 under boot priority, has to boot to m.2 as thats the only drive to have windows on it i guess

 

Yeah but maybe your system first checks if there is a USB drive with windows or an optical drive with windows or a hdd with windows. And that may take time.

[SLOTHINSPACE]

Just now, suedseefrucht said:

Yeah but maybe your system first checks if there is a USB drive with windows or an optical drive with windows or a hdd with windows. And that may take time.

If what i said is correct il try and put m.2 in front of windows boot priority and see what happens 

 

[suedseefrucht]

1 minute ago, SLOTHINSPACE said:

If what i said is correct il try and put m.2 in front of windows boot priority and see what happens 

 

39 seconds for a not optimized boot order is still long though.
Im pretty new here and I would trust our long experienced guys here.
Maybe the bios update solves your problem.

[SLOTHINSPACE]

2 minutes ago, suedseefrucht said:

39 seconds for a not optimized boot order is still long though.
Im pretty new here and I would trust our long experienced guys here.
Maybe the bios update solves your problem.

i dont think i bios update is worth as it could make problems il have a look at boot order and see

 

[SLOTHINSPACE]

13 minutes ago, suedseefrucht said:

39 seconds for a not optimized boot order is still long though.
Im pretty new here and I would trust our long experienced guys here.
Maybe the bios update solves your problem.

Changing the boot under from windows boot manager to m.2 made it so it would not boot to windows thanks for the info anyways