Jump to content

There are like 5 different types of DVI dude.

DVI-D can adapt passively to HDMI, so in that case it's literally the same thing.

NEW PC build: Blank Heaven   minimalist white and black PC     Old S340 build log "White Heaven"        The "LIGHTCANON" flashlight build log        Project AntiRoll (prototype)        Custom speaker project

Spoiler

Ryzen 3950X | AMD Vega Frontier Edition | ASUS X570 Pro WS | Corsair Vengeance LPX 64GB | NZXT H500 | Seasonic Prime Fanless TX-700 | Custom loop | Coolermaster SK630 White | Logitech MX Master 2S | Samsung 980 Pro 1TB + 970 Pro 512GB | Samsung 58" 4k TV | Scarlett 2i4 | 2x AT2020

 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1114512-dvi-vs-hdmi/#findComment-12973567
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

HDMI has more baandwidth, but sometimes monitors have an older revision of HDMI so it makes it worse on that monitor

I WILL find your ITX build thread, and I WILL recommend the SIlverstone Sugo SG13B

 

Primary PC:

i7 8086k - EVGA Z370 Classified K - G.Skill Trident Z RGB - WD SN750 - Jedi Order Titan Xp - Hyper 212 Black (with RGB Riing flair) - EVGA G3 650W - dual booting Windows 11 and Fedora Linux - Black and green theme, Razer brainwashed me.

Draws 400 watts under max load, for reference.

 

PSU tier list

How many watts do I need?

PSU misconceptions, protections explainedgroup reg is bad

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1114512-dvi-vs-hdmi/#findComment-12973579
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

HDMI (High-Definition Multimedia Interface), since 2002

 

It all depends on the version... hence you hear/see the port + version, like HDMI 2.1

HDMI specs per version

version | band width (Gbps) | Color deeps (bits) | Max resolution
2.1           | 48.0 | 48 | 7680x4320 60p / 3840x2160 120p
2.0, 2.0b     | 18.0 | 48 | 3840x2160 60p
1.4           | 10.2 | 48 | 3840x2160 30p
1.3           | 10.2 | 48 | 2560x1440 60p
1.0, 1.1, 1.2 | 4.95 | 24 | 1920x1200 60p

 

versions through out time

HDMI Version 2.1 (2017)
Added support for 4K 120p, 8K, scene-by-scene Dynamic HDR and ARC for high-end surround sound (eARC). Ultra high-speed 2.1 cables are required.

HDMI Version 2.0a (2015)
Added support for high dynamic range (HDR) meta-data. See HDR.

HDMI Version 2.0 (2013)
HDMI 2.0 increased 4K frame rate without needing new cables. Support added for 32 audio channels, two simultaneous video streams, the Rec. 2020 color space, 3D at 25 fps and a super-wide 21:9 aspect ratio. See ITU-R HD standards.

HDMI Version 1.4 (2009)
HDMI 1.4 added major home theater enhancements, including 4K resolution, 3D, Blu-ray 3D, Ethernet sharing and the audio return channel (see HDMI ARC). See HDMI 1.4.

HDMI Version 1.3 (2006)
HDMI 1.3 boosted resolution, colors (see deep color) and gamut (see xvYCC). It added lip sync, surround sound modes (see True HD and DTS) and cable categories (see HDMI cable types).

HDMI Version 1.0 (2002)
HDMI 1.0 supported the first high-end digital TV standard (1920x1080). Versions 1.1 and 1.2 added DVD-Audio and SACD audio formats.

 

 

some types:

 

_HDMITYP.GIF

 

 

*******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

*******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

 

DVI (Digital Visual Interface), since 1999:

 

There are 3 types of DVI interfaces

 

  • DVI-I (integrated, combines digital and analog in the same connector; digital may be single or dual link)
  • DVI-D (digital only, single link or dual link)
  • DVI-A (analog only)

With some restrictions as well:

 

Single link: 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) @ 60 Hz
Dual link: 2560 × 1600 (WQXGA) @ 60 Hz
Analog video stream: 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) @ 60 Hz

 

 

The problem with old interfaces was always it's refresh rate, with monitors pass well over 60Hz, you would always need to use a DisplayPort interface to take the full res of your screen

 

With such info, it's easier to take your own conclusions :) 

 

NZXT H440 | i7 8700K @ 3.7GHz | Asus TUF Z370 | (4x8) 32GB | GTX 1080Ti | 1x Asus ROG Swift PG349Q + 2x Dell S2417DG | SSD NVMe (960+256) + HHD Barracuda 2Tb
AudioEngine D1 | Aune X7s | AudioEngine A5+ | HD 6xx | PC 37X | Z60 7.1 | Hart Audio cable set | G502 | G915 TKL

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1114512-dvi-vs-hdmi/#findComment-12973638
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Comes down to type and hardware. 

 

I preferred dvi as it supported higher refreshed rates on the stuff I use. 

 

Prefer dp now as my stuff has it and supports gsync unlike hdmi. Not like it’s particularly needed though. 

 

Main RIg Lian Li O11 MINI, I7 9900k, ASUS ROG Maximus XI Hero, G.Skill Ripjaws 3600 32GB, 3090FE, EVGA 1000G5, Acer Nitro XZ3 2560 x 1440@240hz 

 

Spare RIg Lian Li O11 AIR MINI, I7 4790K, Asus Maximus VI Extreme, G.Skill Ares 2400 32Gb, EVGA 1080ti, 1080sc 1070sc & 1060 SSC, EVGA 850GA, Acer KG251Q 1920x1080@240hz 

 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1114512-dvi-vs-hdmi/#findComment-12974691
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×