Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'results'.
-
From the album: PC
-
I'm looking for the best performing vapor chamber solution out there. Clearly, it's going to cost more than your standard 30 bucks on a 212 EVO. However, They aren't generally that expensive when compared to some of those water cooled solutions out there and I want better performance than an air cooler with the reliability that comes with traditional water-based solutions.
-
Hi, I just thought it would be cool to create a thread of people listing their Ryzen overclocking results, submissions should list hardware compenents and overclocking results preferebly with CPU-Z validation as proof, my results are as follows: CPU: AMD RYZEN 5 1600X Clock Speed: 4.1Ghz Voltage: 1.4V Cooler: BeQuiet! Pure Rock OC Load Temp: 63°C Motherboard: ASUS Prime X370-PRO Validation: http://valid.x86.fr/gp30w7 Please note: I haven't tried pushing pass 4.1 yet as I have only had the system for one day, however there may still be more headroom as it only took 0.025V to go from 4Ghz to 4.1 however I do not want to exceed 1.4V for 24/7 Usage (I am also having extreme difficulty with RAM with one of my DIMMs being DOA)
-
Hello! I am thinking of swapping out my 3570K@4.3ghz for an i7 2600k, I can get it for around £30 and I think that's a reasonable price for the bump in multicore performance provided I can overclock it to at least 4.5ghz. I realise that the Silicon Lottery plays a part in determining overclocks, but I was hoping to find out what other's had achieved and what core speed, voltage and cooler was used. I currently have a Noctua NH-U14S which is keeping my i5 under 70 degrees with 60% fan speed. Any help would be greatly appreciated, Thank You ?
-
Here's my full bechmark: https://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/11623067 I'm not sure why my EVGA GTX 1050 TI SC score is so low. The only thing I can think of is that there may be some sort of driver conflict (see Device Manager). What do we think?
-
Alright so understanding that G.SKILL makes pretty competitively priced memory. I understand in the custom PC world, value is by far king. Doing a quick search yielded ~156,000,000 results for Google and ~4,360,000 on YouTube when I used the term, "Budget PC". However, I'd like to put my data out on the web for what I find. I am in NO means a professional, nor do I have any professional training when it comes to working with computers. However, as an avid gamer, I've built myself and friends quite a few PC's and I feel I represent an honest, average, and fair consumer. SO. Join me, wont you? Anyway back to budget. I recently upgraded my daily driver PC. In doing so, I made the switch to DDR4. Looking around, I finally decided on G.SKILL Ripjaws V Series 16GB Kit. Its a 8 x 2 kit and for the money at the time it was the best option. I also moved to the Z270 platform and in doing so purchased an ASRock Z270 Killer SLI/AC. A wonderful board covered in classy lush white, but not enough to make it gaudy. It also has a RGB port on the bottom. (More on that later) Next I wanted to pick a new case. My NZXT S340 was a couple years old at this point and I really liked the look of the Corsair Air 540. Did you know a Corsair is a fast ship used for Piracy? This case comes with two 140mm White LED Fans in the front. I installed a Intel Core I5 7600k OC to 4.0, and to keep it cool naturally I chose a Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO. I'm still using my EVGA Geforce GTX 960 4GB SSC, and the other pieces of the puzzle aren't really important. I've had the PC together for a little while now and I've gotten the Itch to make it a little more appealing to the eyes. Now, I have planned to make this a fully white themed build, and the first thing I need to address is those bright red RAM DIMMs. So, join me! I'm going to be testing the thermal effects on the RAM with painted heat sinks. Also, cheap upgrades to take this build from mediocre to awesome! Also, I'm new here. I'm still vague on how all this works. haha.
-
I don't usually use Chrome on my Nexus tablet because the tablet is old and not very fast. But when I do, search results are optimized for mobile and they look like shit. Sure, I could request a desktop version of the site but I'd have to do that every time. Google search settings don't allow me to remove suggested apps based on search. The problem is that the actual search content I'm looking for is tiny and I have to scroll all the way down, it's redonkulous. Is there a way to get rid of all the crap search results that I haven't figured out? Keep in mind this is 6 screenshots combined, I have to scroll 4 or 5 times to get to the actual search results. -
GPU Clock Offset: +220MHz Mem Clock Offset: +200MHz Power Target: 116% Temp Target: 91c (priority) Voltage: 100% (1093mV) Reaches around 2.2GHz in games and stays at around 70c~ I have included all my results in a .rar incase anyone wants too see how it did using the gpu boost 3.0 curve. Done using EVGA Precision X OC 1060 benchmark.rar
-
Hello everyone. So, I've been doing some benchmarking in 3DMark Fire Strike. Are those results normal for my system?
-
i was just wondering what overclocks people had got on there 4690k chips cause at the moment im at 4.4ghz without touching the voltage and i was wondering what i should expected to get to compared to other peoples overclocks. so if you want to post your results down below that would be great, thanks.
-
is 447 cb for having i5 skylake i have not overklocked im afraid im gonna fuck up and my gpu is a bit old
-
This was my first time properly overclocking a GPU I think if I replaced the thermal compound on my GPU the max load temp would have been lower considering I have had it for around 2 years without ever replacing it. I ran the benchmarks for a minimum of 10 minutes I would have ran them longer but I just don't have the time at the minute. Overall I think I have done ok so far with this OC what do you think I will post the final results in the a comment below the thread. GPU: Gainward GTX 770 Stock Core Voltage: +0mV Power Limit: 100% Max Load Temp: 81c Idle Temp: 41c Core: +0 (1046MHz) Memory: +0 (1753MHz) Boost: 1085MHz Overclocked (Stable) Core Voltage: +0mV (stock) Power Limit: 109% (max) Max Load Temp: 84c Idle Temp: 44c Core: +130 (1176MHz) Memory: +100 (1803MHz) Boost: 1215MHz Source: GPU-Z Benchmark: Valley Overclocking Software: Msi Afterburner
-
Please share you Passmark Performance Test Score here by downloading Performance Test if you have not already from and use the trial for now: http://www.passmark.com/products/pt.htm BTW Here is mine:
-
any IB people crying and curling up at the moment waiting for results should feel free to hang out discuss and maybe just whine a bit about how terrible we have had it until now. General discussion about anything you'd like Discuss what we expect and future "career" paths.
-
Hello everyone. So I recently got the Sapphire Radeon R9 280 and am waiting to get a few cables I need for it. In the mean time I thought I'd ask the question if my setup will be enough for Star Citizen My build: AMD A-10 6800k @ 4.1GHz Non-OC'd Sapphire Radeon R9 280 OC Edition - No additional overclocking Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-D3H 1x120mm front fan + 1x80mm exhaust fan Comment below what you think I can get out of Star Citizen in graphics settings and resolution. Thanks!
-
So after I posted on the question "How did I do on my 5820K?" I got replies saying you got a pretty good chip. So thats a relief that I didn't get a bad one! Anyways, I've tested more. So here is my results. Little bit about my system: Intel 5820K with ASUS X99-E WS and Corsair Dominator RAM at 2800mhz Average temperatures were taken over a period of 2 hours. All temps and stability checks were validated by Aida 64. XMP was turned on for all of these speeds. Base clock Frequency: 125 3.3 on 4 cores 3.6 on 2 cores (Stock) 24/7 Stock at stock voltages XMP: ON BCLKF:125 CPU Multi for 3.3: 27 CPU multi for 3.6: 29 Average temperature: 46 C 4.0 on 6 cores (Overclock) 24/7 Overclock at 1.2 Volts XMP: ON Average temperature: 55 C BCLKF:125 CPU Multi: 32 4.5 on 6 cores (Overclock) 15 Hours at 1.35 Volts XMP: ON Average temperature: 68 C BCLKF: 125 CPU Multi: 36 4.625 on 6 Cores (Overclock) 9 Hours at 1.4 Volts XMP: ON Average temperature: 78 C BCLKF: 125 CPU Multi: 37 1.4 is my personal limit, If I had a custom loop I think I could have pushed it to 1.5 Volts. So my question again is : How did I do on the silicon lottery? I use the 4.0 for folding at home, since turning up CPU performance actually boosted my graphics card performance tremendously. I think I can get 4.5 to go for 24/7 if I bump up the voltages up to 1.4, but thats a little bit scary to do.
-
Alright guys, time for the daily wtf My buddy's and my systems are as follows (for the important bits) I have an i7-950 with a GTX 970 He has an i5-4690k and dual gtx 660's decided to cinebench the two for comparison He had better performance per core, but I had more threads, so the scores were decently close less than 100 points difference, notbad.jpg it gets weird when we run the opengl portion tho I got a 70.1 fps, which I thought was not bad I supposedly beat out an identical system to mine (where are you, stranger with an identical comp?) that had 52.13 fps once again, notbad.jpg BUT my buddies comp, with his slightly better cpu and inferior gpu setup pulled in a whopping 116.62 fps which (according to the application) is quad core xeon/quadro level results does he have a magic setup, or is cinebench not as reliable as I was led to believe? -
Hi guys, can owners of USB Wifi Boosters do a speedtest with and without the boosters? I'm thinking of getting one but doubting the power of it THANKS IN ADVANCE!!
-
As the debate over the existence of climate change shifted from “We don’t know,” to “Okay, most of the science says it exists, but we gotta hear both sides,” nobody has been more important to the fragile climate denialism side than scientists like Wei-Hock Soon. As data massed in support of man-made climate change, the work of Soon, a Harvard-Smithsonian Center astrophysicist, was coveted by oil companies because he offered alternative explanations that seemingly absolved the energy sector of any wrong doing. Soon argued that it wasn’t human activities like, say, carbon emissions, that are leading to a greenhouse effect; the Earth’s rising temperature is instead a result of energy fluctuations in the sun. Blaming the sun rather than SUV’s and coal factories had a certain appeal to industries which relied on SUVs and coal for profits. If that all sounds very convenient, well, it turns out that it is. According to newly released documents obtained by Greenpeace, Soon’s “research” was less about truthseeking and more a pay-by-the-data-point mercenary number of jobs that were, for all intents-and-purposes, commissioned by the oil industry to keep the debate over the existence of climate change intentionally muddy. The parties didn’t even try to hide it. To break it down, Exxon Mobil paid Soon $335,000 for his “work,” American Petroleum Institute chipped in $274,000, and our friends, the Koch brothers, gave him another $230,000. The idea that these groups paid Soon out of a dispassionate love for objective science is laughable. The Koch brothers don’t even want to give their employees health insurance, so thinking they’d give a quarter of a million dollars to a scientist without any obvious benefit to themselves is delusional. Soon was “hired” to get the results that would benefit oil and gas companies, plain and simple. Despite the obvious incentives, Soon’s work has been used again and again by everyone from Fox “News” hosts to politicians to justify inaction on climate change. Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-OK), a man who literally wrote the book on climate denialism, loves Soon’s work and uses it as part of his climate change fighting machine that works to block any bill that seeks to address the problem. What Soon has done is not only scientifically disingenuous, but helps reinforce the strategy enacted by oil companies to delay and confuse action on climate change, in a very similar way to what tobacco companies did in the 1990s. The goal isn’t to “win” the debate, because the evidence is overwhelming against them. Instead, the endgame is to avoid reaching the endgame. Every year that America fails to address climate change in any meaningful way means one more year of extremely high profits for the companies who perpetuate the problem. Soon is among the hired guns that enable this strategy to work. And he’s made a fortune from it. Soon has not commented publicly about the new allegations, but has previously said that while he does take money from oil companies, he “would never be motivated by money for anything.” I guess we’re just supposed to take his word for that. Source : http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/us/ties-to-corporate-cash-for-climate-change-researcher-Wei-Hock-Soon.html
- 9 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- oil companies
- convenient
- (and 3 more)
-
Well guys the exams are just around the corner! Plus I have participated in this art competition in which I will get prize! So wish me luck for both of these things! (Can't wait to know the art's result!)
-
Hey guys, Now I know that Air vs water is a very common debate, but i'm looking for raw numbers on noise. If any of you guys have any raw numbers about noise performance of custom loops (I know that there are many variables in this but I just what an average loop) vs air cooling or can link me to a sight where they do, I will be very grateful. The reason I'm asking this is that water cooling loops are just so damn expensive! So I thought maybe I could get away with a Be Quiet! Dark Rock Pro 3 in terms of noise (the noctua ones are really ugly in my opinion). Do you guys think that I will see much of a difference in noise? Thanks -Billy sorry for the jumpy writing in this post, instead of planning it like I normally do I just spoke my mind
-
So I have tested the commands in user.cfg or in console. And there are the results:
-
So I have been messing around with my MSI R9 290 Watercooled with an Accelero Hyrbrid trying to push the max performance I can out of it. I have been testing stability with OCCT and then running 3d Mark Fire strike to see the performance. The weird thing is that when i pushed the clock speed upto 1080Mhz and the memory clock upto 1400Mhz I got a 3D mark score averaging 7810. However when I put the card back to defaults (Core: 947Mhz, Memory: 1250Mhz) to compare my overclock results I averaged 8370 on the exact same test. Does anyone know why this is happening? It seems really weird to me. Also should i bother testing stability with a program like OCCT or just bump up the overclock and then test 3D mark again and see how it goes? Thanks in advance, Nik
-
I was looking for a chart, list or anything that is simplified based on results, for graphic cards that support 4k based on level of detail before lag induces, price point, and anything else that can be used to factor the results. so for instance: GTX 780: supported - max rendering - $$$$ just something that I can glance at in 30 seconds and understand instead of watching a video or a 10 page report from some dude out in the boonies.
-
Hello LTT Community, Recently today I went to an Asus/Nvidia event where they were showcasing different things about Nvidia and Asus, for example, they were showcasing Steam Boxes, the new GTX 750Ti and a G-Sync monitor and non-G-sync one to compare. The results were actually impressive, looking back and forth from the one with and without G-Sync, you actually get to see what are the differences between turning V-Sync on/off and then getting stuttering ( v-sync on ) or tearing ( v-sync off ). I then looked over to the right where the G-Sync monitor was and it was such a smooth picture, I finally see why you have to experience this in real life, it is only something the eye sees. I recommend trying G-Sync at least once whether it be at CES or a Nvidia event. Thanks, James
