Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'cpu-z'.
-
I'm doing an Undervolting and following this guide https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dU5qLJqTSAc to correctly identify what core fails when i get an error, so go the Event Log and take the value to modify it till goes stable. But i would like to do it from Ryzen Master so i don't need to restart and enter the BIOS each time. But comparing CPU-Z and RM, one of them start counting cores from 0 and the other one from 1. So lets say Thread 3 givean error, which CORE will be: 1 or 2 in Ryzen Master? Thx.
-
Hi guys, my s9 works normally but today i download cpu-z to check my temperatures and they are unbelievable, i checked and saw people who were worried abt getting 40-41c temps and then there's me, mine are in the 60-70c range(while gaming when the phone is idle the temps are around 40c) and idk what to do i was playing cod on high settings and did not stutter for once, i ran a 3dmark benchmark on my phone and it ws better than 92% of them, the phone does not feel hot to the touch at 40c while it should i have this other phone and it starts to feel hot when i am gaming and the temps hit 38-39 (just adding ofc yes the phones feels fairly hot like hot hot when it reaches those 60-70 temp ranges) so does anyone know what is happening here
- 8 replies
-
- s9
- overheating?
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Issue: Programs taking minutes to load, Programs going unresponsive for minutes when focused. Setup: New build, existing windows 10 install. CPU: Intel i7-11700k MOBO: Asus Z590-E WIFI RAM: 2x 8GB Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR4 3000mhz GPU: EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 Super SSD: Samsung EVO 1TB SSD. Situation: Updated all drivers. Ram is placed in the 2nd and 4th spot from CPU. Tried swapping the ram (placing 4th slot into second slot, vice versa). Tried using each ram individually. Device manager shows no hardware having driver issues. BIOS is all default with no overclocking. When programs do run - they eventually will, they run just fine performance wise. Played COD Vanguard, Elden Ring, and League of Legends max settings without a hiccup. I did have an issue with the WIFI driver not installing correctly, but I uninstalled the driver and reinstalled and now it works. I'm at a loss of what to try next, google searches are littered with freeware "fixes".
-
My cpu is the i7 9800x, what do the red cores mean? Also, how accurate are cpu-z benchmarks? According to it, my cpu has a better singlecore rating than the 8700k, even though I have seen the opposite in other benchmarks like passmark. Singlecore is useful for gaming right? does that mean my cpu is actually a bit better for gaming then the 8700k?
-
Summary Chinese PC enthusiast Extreme Player, with access to a Core i9-13900K engineering sample (ES), tested the chip on a handful synthetic tests; with the processor yielding significant performance gains over its predecessor, the i9-12900K. The most striking performance number has to be the CPU-Z Bench single-core test, which shows an impressive 9.41% increase over that of the i9-12900K. The multi-threaded CPU-Z Bench sees an incredible 46.34% performance increase. The story repeats with Cinebench R23, with an incredible 13.53% single-thread performance increase, and a 40.25% multi-threaded performance increase. Quotes My thoughts I'm happy to see that this chip is already running @ 5.5GHz, with boosts topping @ 5.7GHz. Meaning there's a possibility of a 13900KS SKU in the future that possibly does 6GHz. Problem is, with Intel's own XTU tool it hit 100C peak temperature and as a result, began throttling; this is even with a 360mm AIO CLC cooler. So it's clearly going to be hard to tame this beast, especially if they plan to increase the clocks even further in future SKUs. From the main chart with all the different tests though, you can clearly see the 13900k winning handily at every test. Zen 4 is definitely going to have its work cut out for it. Sources https://videocardz.com/newz/intel-core-i9-13900k-pre-production-sample-tested-10-faster-than-core-i9-12900k-in-single-core-tests https://www.tweaktown.com/news/87385/intel-core-i9-13900k-pre-production-cpu-has-been-fully-reviewed/index.html https://www.techpowerup.com/296815/intel-raptor-lake-es-posts-9-4-higher-single-core-performance-than-alder-lake https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/intel-raptor-lake-es-is-9-faster-in-single-core-performance-over-alder-lake.html https://hothardware.com/news/13900k-beats-12900k-in-single-core Small update to this story, gaming benchmarks added ~ Summary Intel i9-13900K "Raptor Lake" ES Improves Gaming Minimum Framerates by 11-27% Over "Alder Lake" i9-12900KF. The processor has been tested by Bilibili techtuber "Extreme Player" in a number of games, including Horizon-Zero Dawn, Red Dead Redemption 2, FarCry 6, Forza Horizon 5, Monster Hunter: Rise and PUBG. There are also benchmarks for Final Fantasy Endwalker, CSGO and 3DMark Timespy and Firestrike tests. Quotes My thoughts Some sizeable gains in certain games, but most importantly there's quite a large improvement with minimums; especially at 1080p and 1440p. Meaning frametimes with this CPU are probably really good. Makes sense that AMD rumors have them releasing the 3D V-Cache parts sooner rather than later if these numbers are anything to go by. Sources https://www.guru3d.com/news-story/minimum-framerates-of-games-evaluated-on-an-engineering-sample-of-intels-core-i9-13900k-have-improved.html https://www.techpowerup.com/296928/intel-i9-13900k-raptor-lake-es-improves-gaming-minimum-framerates-by-11-27-over-i9-12900kf https://videocardz.com/newz/intel-core-i9-13900k-engineering-sample-tested-in-games-shows-improvement-in-minimum-framerate https://www.tomshardware.com/news/core-i9-13900k-outperform-core-i9-12900k-by-5-percent-in-early-gaming-benchmarks Another small update to this story, CPU-Z benchmarks added ~ Summary An alleged engineering sample of the Core i9-13900K 'Raptor Lake' CPU has emerged over at CPU-Z Validation website database, spotted by Twitter leaker @TUM_APISAK. Quotes My thoughts Since this is on a DDR4 motherboard and is being paired with slow 2666MHz DDR4, I would say the results are pretty spectacular as it's not even 3200MHz or 3600MHz DDR4 that they are using here (the usual sweet spots for DDR4). Let alone DDR5 (which definitely will benefit the platform). It's also on Windows 10, which can prove to be slower compared to Windows 11 on Alder Lake and also probably Raptor Lake. The sample in its current state is faster than a 24c/48t Threadripper 2970WX. This is with all the caveats in place (the slow DDR4, Windows 10, etc.). Also, there have been 13900k engineering samples that are going up to 5.5GHz, with dual cores boosting to 5.8GHz. While here this sample is locked to 5.0GHz. Meaning again another variable to add to the equation of further improvements being able to be made with final silicon. The only downfall I see here, is again the CPU was hitting 100°C, meaning cooling this beast is going to be difficult. Sources https://videocardz.com/newz/intel-core-i9-13900k-24-core-processor-spotted-on-cpu-z-validator-website-along-with-slow-ddr4-memory https://www.techpowerup.com/297036/intel-raptor-lake-es-cpu-visits-cpu-z-database
- 34 replies
-
- intel
- raptor lake
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
From the album: bench
-
Hello, I just bought ROG Zephyrus G15 (2022 version) with 16GB DDR5 RAM (8 soldered + 8 stick), and I just installed CPU-Z to check the RAM and this is what I got: What the hell are those readings! (575 MHZ DRAM Frequency?) (Uncore Frequency 287.8MHZ) I also got this result in SPD tab: Is this normal? Or have I just got screwed by ASUS?!
-
Hey, first of all, not quite sure if I am creating this thread in the right topic, I just assumed that it will be okay under "Gpu" So to cut a long story short, I upgraded to an RTX 3070 TI a few days ago (former 1060 3gig) and in the begining it was alright, did a clean driver install and while yes, there was almost no improvement in the games I usually play I assumed that it is as they are CPU bound more than GPU (cyberpunk actually saw a massive improvement I am not even going to lie there, was barely running it before that) CSGO was an unlucky winner tho, somehow my performance dropped from 300-450fps to measly 100? 150? and if I were to move more and more it would even dip below 100? Did the following: DDU (tried it twice actually) Go back to an earlier version of the GPU drivers Checked if everything is good with my GPU (not overheating or anything)- while yes, it is getting 80C it does get quite enough air to go back to a normal temp when not on 100% load, thus overheating is out of the question I went through previous threads of users and did the "quick easy fix that I found" such as xmp profiles, gpu being "power limited" and so on and so forth, nothing appears to be actually working. The PC in question is the following: Ryzen 5 5600X RTX 3070TI (sadge) [EDIT: 3070 TI gainward Phoenix] RMX 750W 32GB ram (4x8G corsair vengance 3200mhz) Samsung 970 Evo Plus (gonna throw that in there just in case, I saw some people asked about "hey what drive do you have and does it have enough space", yes, it should definitely not be a drive issue. TL;DR once more, heavy games no issues, "lower spec" games (such as csgo, league, minecraft, you name it) are an issue and I have no idea what to do anymore. EDIT: After around 17 hours from the issue first occuring and 12 hours after creating this thread I was able to fix it, and you would never guess how. I was sitting in a call with a friend listening to me going bonkers about how tired and how much I want to give up when he suggested that I disconnect the fans that I installed about a day and a half ago (as a joke) at the time I didn't pay him much attention as this sounds unreasonable, right? [In hindsight this will be the best advise I have ever received.] So I carry on trying to troubleshoot the PC, old CPU goes in, new goes out, new GPU gooes out old goes in, ram, so on and so forth, clean windows install on another drive, xmp profiles, you name it, I've done it. Fast forward about 30-40 minutes ago, I have given up and will probably just use the PC to watch stuff on and not give it much thought as I am no longer really playing anything anymore so I decide to give it a shot, why not disconnect the intake and see what happens. I disconnect the intake, boot, (boots like 3x times quicker, which I didn't even really care about really, but somehow happen) run tests and WHAT??? the performance is BACK??? CSGO WITH OVER 800 FPS???? REALLY????? I go to plug the fans back in to confirm the theory, boom, nothing actually changes at all? The performance is still there but another issue starts, GPU fans (A singular fan out of the 3) spins 100% 24/7 and the system does not even pick it up as being spun. I am yet again left speechless and scratching my head.... alright, lets see, what can I do, maybe I left something out? Maybe I forgot to connect something? Nope, everything looks good, and there literally isnt anything that the GPU has to connect even other than the power connectors. Bad.. I think to myself, I could probably disconnnect the fand and just have two but, do I really wanna do that? Oh, whats that, my front RGB (case) controller is disconnected? Oh, let me connect it real quick. **CONNECTS** Alright, lets boot one last time and see if I can thinker a bit more with the GPU software, oh whats that? My fan is no longer spinning out of its mind???? WHAT??? A FREAKING RGB CONTROLLER??????? NO WAY, right? But actually, yes way, disconnected it to see what will happen and my GPU fan starts spining out its mind YET AGAIN, alright, there, found it, but how? How and how... TL;DR 2 - Fans+RGB controller somehow fixed CPU issue?????? okay..
-
hello, i have 16gb ram installed and my bios does show 16gb, so does cpu-z but task manager shows this (pic) help me
- 7 replies
-
- ram
- windows 10
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
So, I've been following the Ryzen leaked CPU-Z benchmarks, and when i was comparing my old Ivy Bridge CPU, I came across this. Why is the 3550 winning a newer Haswell CPU? Also, why is it winning an Extreme edition CPU at single thread benchmarks?? Do I have a really good CPU currently?
-
What's wrong with cpu-z? I did not overclock my cpu yet. All load with default bios setting Bios only allow me to read the VCCIN voltage
-
umm soo i just downloaded the new CPUz 1.79.0 (the one done for ryzen), has anyone else noticed the Core Voltage?? in bios my cpu voltage is set to 1.35... CPUz is saying its like 2.9... is this like normal, or have they gone done goof ?
-
Hello LTT community, I've been having problems with Windows 10 and my motherboard recently. Three desktop shortcut images won't load (CPU-Z, ASRock APP Shop, and ASRock A-Tuning Utility), and I've already tried to soft restart, hard restart, manually select shortcut icons in the properties menu, but nothing seems to be working. My motherboard is a Z170 Extreme4 with an i7-6700K installed. It's been showing two postcodes: 30 and 40. The manual says they're related to memory and the CPU, but they went away once during a restart. Does anyone have any idea what is going on here? Thanks, DAGGER51
- 4 replies
-
- windows 10
- asrock
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Hello, When i am trying to overclock my Ryzen 1700 the clock speed shows in HWMonitor and CPU-Z as 1549MHz. But in the bios and on Task manager it shows the 'correct and higher' clock speed. Doesnt matter what i set the clock speeds to, as soon as it is not auto it doesnt display correct value. When i first start the system and load HWMonitor it will show the full clock speed and then instantly go down to 1549MHz. I am using the Ryzen R7 1700, MSI X370 Gaming Plus motherboard and 16GB corsair LPX Ram. Why is this happening? (added screenshot of problem) Thanks.
- 6 replies
-
- ryzen
- overclocking
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Hi, i have an odd issue with my 4 mounths old R7 1700 system, i get crashes running Cpu-Z 1,79 or 1,8 together with chrome, black screens over all 3 monitors, + system not responding + cannot shut down system on power key, have to shutdown psu for system to close down. I first believed it to be a faulty motherboard or psu, but i can replicate the issue with CPU-Z + Chrome combination, and i dont seem to get any issues in anything else so far, again system had been running almost since Ryzen launch, and i never had any issues until now, the only change i made over the last 2-4 weeks, was running the newer 803 beta bios on my X370 Prime pro, but the issue didn't start until last week. I was running a 3,8ghz/2933mem oc until then, all stable, however the obvious first thing i did to test the issue was to down-clock and run everything at stock, (loaded optimized defaults in bios). Have anyone else had ANY issue like this, or have any idea where my problem is, or if its simply something with Cpu-Z and chrome that i have never heard off before. It seems odd since i have had cpu-z + chrome opened at the same time many times before without any issues. Also, theres no error msg before the blackscreens, and i dont know exactly if chrome has a crash log i can acces. Also sry for semi bad English, i am in a non native English-speaking country, and i refuse to pussy out and use google translate all the time. Suggestions plz ?
- 13 replies
-
i7 4790k working worse than an i5 6600k?
Ricky_SHTK posted a topic in CPUs, Motherboards, and Memory
So i just downloaded cpu-z and ran a benchmark... and the results i think they were not good. I compared to other users with same cpu and they are getting much more of score... As you can see, in the image, the reference is 100 % , so how it should be. Mine is only at 57%... help! -
I installed CPU-Z and it doesnt want to start, every time i try this pop's: Any solution ideas?
- 1 reply
-
- cpu-z
- windows 10
- (and 4 more)
-
Is it a bad idea to install CPU-Z on a Windows Server 2019 AD?
-
Hi All, I am wondering if this is normal for this CPU? I did not overclock it in BIOS but it runs a higher frequency. At the time of taking the screenshot nothing except chrome was running. I noticed the multiplier is changing on its own every few seconds from x43 to x44. never used CPU-Z so i wanted to check if that's normal. Could it be because of XMP enabled in bios? But it should not touch my CPU afaik? What you think?
- 9 replies
-
- i7-8086k
- coffee lake
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Latest benchmark As the title says, UBM says my xmp profile isn't enabled but I confirmed i have it enabled in the BIOS memory CPU-Z cpu CPU-Z I also just recently OC my cpu from 3.2 to 4.0 with Intel Extreme Tuning Utility. Confirmed with benchmarks and 1hr stress tests to ensure that It is stable. Whenever I restart and go back into the bios though it would revert any changes made with IETU and boot with defaults until I loaded the program. I also went into the bios and double checked that xmp 2.0 was enabled in its own profile and made sure the set clock speeds were 3200 for the ram. I also only changed the GHz for the cpu to 4.0 and made no voltage or other clock changes but CPU-z didn't reflect the core speed when I tested it and only boosted to 3.6 GHz until I opened IETU and loaded my 4.0GHz profile. Not sure why things weren't being saved from the bios when I clicked save changes and boot option upon exit. If you guys have any suggestions or tips I'd appreciate it.
-
I have an asus x455l laptop. I wanna play dota 2 with it but the on board 4 gig ram of the laptop struggles with the game so I used my spare 2 gig laptop ram. It boots normally but it doesnt detect that i installed a new ram in the slot, i checked with cpu-z and it can actually see the ram in the spd section. What am i doing wrong?
- 4 replies
-
- ram upgrade
- x455l
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Dear friends, recently i upgraded my RAM from Hyperx Fury 2133 to Crucial Balistix sport dual ranked 2666, XMP is enabled on my Z370 Tomahawk (bios 7B47v11) and 8600k, however CPU-Z is showing 1333Mhz. I tried memtest64, which runs with system, memory speed did not go up a bit. Should i be worried, or is this just normal? Thank you for all your answers.
-
Hello, I just recently upgraded my CPU from an A6-7400k to an X4 880k. I updated the drivers and I noticed that CPU-Z and Task Manager says that I only have 2 cores when my CPU is a quad core. I checked the BIOS and it showed that all of my cores were running, but windows did not. I have tried everything and it would be appreciated if someone could help. Screenshots and specs are below. Specs: OS: Windows 10 Home 64-bit CPU: AMD A6-7400k RAM: 8GB Dual Channel DDR3 Motherboard: Gigabyte F2A68HM-HD2 GPU: GTX 750 Ti\ Screenshots: