Pieterv24

Those pictures and videos you had? Don't settle for those. Capture new ones. 
All your contacts gone? You weren't gonna settle with your current circle of friends were you? Find new contacts! 
#NeverSettle

id say either a GTX 1660ti or a RTX 2060 depending on your budget and need for real time ray tracing

Probably wol(wake-on-lan) is turned on like others said.
If you want to test this. 
- disconnect desktop from network. 
- turn on laptop 
- if desktop still turns on call an exorcist

There is no such thing as "usual voltage".
Every CPU is different, that's why it's called a silicon lottery.
Just because someone else's CPU can get 5GHz at 1.3v does not mean yours can.
 
Obviously it can't, and you either need to reduce the frequency or increase the voltage further.
It there is no guarantee that an H100i will get you 5GHz for the 7700k.
It sounds to me like you need to do a bit more research on overclocking before you try frying your CPU.

Just as a heads-up/progress report: Making my own class was a bit daunting, so I opted for doing the program like this:
So, I made all of the buttons, put them (or rather, their references(?)) into an array, then used their position in the array to call the .read() and .isPressed() methods. Though I couldn't figure out a way to abbreviate the creation of button objects, the loop itself looks cleaner than before, so I'm happy with it for the time being.
 
I would like try making a class though. Ideally, the object itself would take the number of buttons as a parameter, and then allow the button to be pressed by using a method that takes the button's number as a parameter.
For example, for a class called Macropad:
// Object Creation
Macropad sampleMacropad( numberOfButtons, debounceTime, etc.);
 
Then, in the main function:
for (int buttonNumber = 0; buttonNumber < numberOfButtons; ++buttonNumber)
{
    sampleMacropad.pressButton(buttonNumber);
}
 
That way, I could simplify both the object creation, and button check/press code.
 
Thanks for the help!

So you care about durability, sound quality, confort, looks and noise isolation.
In that case I just Cannot recommend beats. they sound terrible(they just over saturate the bass which makes some people believe they are actually good).
as for comfort, and build quality they are artificially weighted to give them a more premium feel.
on the department of looks I can't argue.
they do look good, but still would you want to pay 300 euros for just looks of a 20 euro piece of plastic and metal?
I know it's your money and you can do what you want. but I would still like to discourage you from buying beats.
It seems as though that you are looking for headphones with good looks.
In that case I would like to recommend sennheiser. for example the Sennheiser momentum (on or over ears. I think over ears do a little more of sound Isolation) they look pretty great for a lower price they do have a massively better sound signature.
or the sennheiser DJ series they are a bit more costly but again look and sound great.
You could also look into razer for example the kraken(my daily driver) It's a bit bulky though but for comfort and sound(they also have a slightly heavy bass but that's just what I like) I would choose them any day over beats.
of course there are many other brands that make great looking/sounding headphones for a good price.
please look into those first before siding with beats.
and If you still want beats after that then so be it.
 
Have a nice day

Heh, nope.
 
Backup wanted data format put data back on don't convert to dynamic disk again solved.