Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Admire

  1. My diet and exercise are fine, it's just that getting outside kinda scares me. Does going out in to the backyard count, because that's my go to place for outdoors.


    It doesn't matter where you go outside, and where you exercise. Sounds like you have some problems with socializing....Which is completely fine! You don't need to be this super social human being....Just be sure to exercise and get sunlight.


    You are still young....Look at your life, but don't look at it like everybody else wants you to be, but find out what YOU want to be.

  2. True, just walking in the sun for 40 minutes every day.... it's nice


    Exactly....It sounds so cliche, but there is very clear science behind this. Getting a lot of sunlight has a huge effect on depression, and mental health in general.


    I literally take out time to get out just for this purpose, especially since I live in a country where there is very dark in winter.

  3. I mean... I didn't want to link the actual video but here it is if you want to see it (does contain penis)



    and statutory rape, not sure what it means for you but upon a quick google search it pulled up this. 

    Sexual intercourse they didn't have any sex, and I'm not talking about sex they had off camera, I'm only talking about the video, she didn't touch his shit, she said it made her uncomfortable, which I'm assuming he stopped a little after that, or she left or what ever (again, only going to focus on the content of the video), but the point is, there was no sex to call statutory rape. I'm also not saying that it has to be him ontop of her for it to be rape either. I'm just saying, this video isn't rape just because he asked for oral sex and she got " a little uncomfortable"


    "Furthermore in Texas, where the footage could have been filmed as it is where Maggie is from, any sex act between an adult and child is considered statutory rape."


    And the age of consent in LA where he is from is also 18......Statutory rape.


    +We have no idea what she felt....Because she has made ZERO comments on the matter. Not coming to her ex boyfriends aid.


    And yes, it is statutory rape if he continued after she said no, which he does....."Come on"....:"DO IT!" "Act like the camera isn't there".......



    Why are you assuming he stopped? You cared enough about this to make this thread, without even hearing her side at all...Like anybody else.


    This chick has been humiliated to the entire world.....


    Im not arguing that he should be charged....But there is no doubt that this is highly inappropriate and that the girl is not a willing participant. She might have been if the camera wasn't on, but she clearly was'n't there.


    Im going to quote an article I read..."

    "I’m really uncomfortable’ is not consent"

  4. Having dealt with mental illness for most parts of my life and in my family, I have a lot of expirience to comment from...:



    I will say the more boring things.....You need to be aware of diet, sunshine and exercise...sounds like crap, but I guarantee you that an improvement in all those three areas will do fucking wonders.

  5. I don't understand what you are trying to say.. You keep saying that it is statutory rape, but this guy didn't even have sex with her (I'm talking about in the video) Hes asking for something, and as far as I know that isn't rape. If he started whipping his dick around in her face or something then yea I could see your point, but being drunk asking for a blowjob isn't really anything. If she'd given him one, or they had some sort of sex, or he did force it down her throat, then yea it would be statutory rape. But right now you're saying that if he actually did something with her it would be statutory rape, which he did nothing but ask for some oral service which isn't rape, that is my point when I say it's getting too broad, because even you are saying that he just committed statutory rape on her.. He didn't really force her into anything, just asking and begging in the video and telling her to do it while giggling. That's not rape. 


    There is your problem....You don't have any knowledge about this.


    And you clearly don't understand the word statutory....


    Any sex they had is statutory rape. Trying to pressure(Asking repeately is pressure) a minor into anything sexual is staturoty rape. She is clearly not comfortable and he doesn't take no for an answer. He pulls down his boxers, and the only thing he doesn't do is forcing it into her mouth.


    You want this to include violence apparantly, before it can be called rape....You need to understand the basics of law apparantly.


    At least look up the term.


    "In statutory rape, overt force or threat is usually not present. Statutory rape laws presume coercion, because a minor or mentally handicapped adult is legally incapable of giving consent to the act."


    It is not rape...Its statutory rape.....She is a minor....Is this really so hard to understand?


    Whether he was filmed doing hardcore BDSM or this, it would still be a adult having sex with a minor.


    Tons of pedophiles have sex with their victims without violence or threats either....Coercion is much more than threats and violence. Its pressure from somebody who is the mature adult.




    To conclude: He is not going to get charged jhere.....This happens a lot with couples in this age group, which is one of the problems with the age of consent being 18....But this dudes "apology" shows the problem here....


    He is the victim...All couples do this...bla bla bla! Sexual assault is a massive problem and sexual assault and pressure to perform sexual acts is a huge problem in many relationships. As much as 40-50 % of women will face this problem at some stage in their life.

  6. I wish this would stop. Could we just get the option of LAN again? This weekend, I was playing with 3 great friends, the entire weekend. Good old school gaming weekend. It went perfect until rockstar decided to stop us playing GTA 5 at all sunday because they had another issue.


    Rockstar decided to not even give us the option of playing LAN......They don't care.

  7. When did I say they should be lessened?

    What I created an account on LTT for isn't any of your business either lol

    And so are you telling me that asking your girlfriend for a blowjob counts as rape? Because that's the biggest bullshit I've ever heard in my life.


    People are going on comment riots flaming this dude for asking his girlfriend to give him a blowjob, (while they were both drunk) and you're agreeing with them? 


    I mean if that's what your saying, you better be damn sure that if you ask your girlfriend for any kind of sex that you are a hypocrite. Also, let me be clear on something, crying rape because someone asked you to suck his dick doesn't even make any sense. I can go out onto the street and ask any woman to give me a blowjob, most I'll get is harassment charges, but what do you think they'll think of me as? a rapist. Simply for the fact that I asked them to do me a sexual favour. 

    Most of the people that were hating on this dude were just dumb 13 year old tumblr chicks jumping on the bandwagon without even giving it a thought on their own. 

    All I'm saying is that rape is getting to be a more broad term, to where anything is being called rape now a days. I'm not saying it should be "lessened" or what ever you said.


    Nope....Im not agreeing or disagreeing with them. Im disagreeing with you that one very specific and to the outside weird case is not a justification for claiming that the definition is getting more and more broad.


    And yes, you are advocating with that it should be less broad when you say its too broad.


    Kinda obvious! :P


    Maybe you should make a thread about 13 year old tumblr chicks, instead of a thread about the definition of rape.


    I don't give a shit about a single case here...Especially when Im not given all the information. You are talking about the definition of rape in general.


    Being drunk is never an excuse for anything.


    Edit: Researched it a bit more. This is a 19 year old dude, who is VERY obviously and continues to pressure a 16 year old girl into participating in a sex tape with the biggest VINE star in the world.


    What a hero.,......Ladies and gentlemen...There is absolutely a mild case of statutory rape. She was 16.....Is this really that hard to understand?


    He is 19, she is 16. The age of consent in his state is 18(Something I actually disagree with...It should be lower, but the law is the law, and just because I disagree with a law, doesn't mean I can break it).


    .....unlawful oral copulation and sexual intercourse with a minor.....She is a minor. Case closed.


    It seems like your problem is that you don't understand the word "Statutory".



    its simple any unwanted sexual act done by force or under threat


    Exactly....Short and to the point.


    Your missing out the whole point people, and no matter what I say someone will come and try to be a smart ass.


    So anybody who disagrees with you is just trying to be a smart ass....


    First of all, ISIS was "made" to distract the west of what is going on here, what they really want is beyond what you think.



    That is really vague....Created how? Are we talking actual control, or what are you talking about? And what is it that is really happening?

    Be specific.



    They blend in easily with civilians just like me and you, "using" Islam as their religion. The real fear is not from ISIS, simply from governments that support them.

    They are muslims.....You might be of the opinion that they aren't practicing islam as you see it, but that doesn't matter in terms of what religion they hold.


    But they are still muslim.


    Question, how in earth did ISIS get all the Western made weapons all of a sudden?



    Very simple to investigate if you wanted. Those weapons deliveries were openly discussed. And it didn't happen "Suddenly"...


    But nobody wants to do the research before becoming conspiracy theorists.


    Most of the weapons were captured from the Iraq military, but tons of it comes militants from libya who were given weapons to oust Gaddafi, and from militants from Mali for the war in 2013.


    The US gave 25 billion to train and equip the iraq army. Look at a map of military bases in the area that ISIS originally captured and its pretty fucking easy to figure out whre the weapons came from. There were some groups during the start of the syrian civil war that was supplied by the US, and some of those groups then joined ISIS when they were really on the rise and were taking over huge parts of iraq and syria, taking the weapons with them.



    They clam to be Muslims, but why are they killing Muslims?




    So what?

    There are plenty of people who kill people of their own religion.


    They have found ways of justifying those killings.....And its pretty easy to do. You just claim that those you kill aren't real muslims.


    Just like you claim that they aren't real muslims.



    Recruitment happen from Western countries as many ISIS leaders said?


    What does that have to do with anything?


    And im pretty sure most of the fighters aren't westeners....




    Anyways, just a point of view, ISIS can't just enter a country carrying weapons, most of their game is hit and run. 




    Why they are controlling parts in Iraq and Syria? Well, those countries have problems and got weak.


    LOL....What a simplistic, and frankly stupid conclusion.


    What problems and weak how?


    Iraq got this way because the americans decided to only put one group in charge of everything, and pissing off a huge part of the country, making it easy for ISIS to attack.

  9. Well, it can be worse I guess.

    Guy slashes super pressurized bank van tire. Blows his shirt off and arm apart. It's on youtube in potato quality.


    Stop it now! You will end up at decapitations and there is no turning back after that.


    Was once tricked into watching a video of that and its branded into my mind



    I would say we are more of a volunteer militia



    We really need to make the rules really, really clear about what a volunteer militia means. :P :P :P


    Scotus joke.

  10. Goad* ^^ 


    Yeah i know. Its basically the large scale equivalent of a kid taunting a bigger kid in a playground.. 



    Yeah.....Isis are the basically the kids...Hope somebody is going to play the part of the gorilla at some point.






    despite ISIS being real and pretty dangerous, they are mostly a distraction of other shit, got the idea that the media is blowing it up(no pun) pretty big, i mean the UN is still looking at it's ass when it comes to taking action so far i know and the local people fight hard.

    So yeah, ISIS succeeding? nahh

    ISIS a real danger? nahhh

    ISIS being a smoke curtain? not unlikely, since the US helped them to arms, just like they did with bin laden.


    for better wording of these views please visist @Trik'Stari who probably shares this opinion to a certain degree.


    There are a lot of evil forces in the word. We get a lot of bullshit from the media. But don't believe that everything is one giant conspiracy that is secrectly controlling everything. The truth is faaaaar more complex which the conspiracy theorists have problems with, because it means that we don't know who the real enemy is.....They want to make everything connected, while the real world consists of a lot of randomness and forces pushing in different directions.


    If you think that ISIS is some concious american or UN invention, you need to pay better attention to history.


    The US provides weapons to everybody at different times...They have provides weapons to both sides of countless conflicts. ...Why? Because they like to try to control shit, and because many of those attempts at control fail, so they change sides.

    People have a desperate need to connect things, and simplify them....


    So the united states provides weapons to some groups fighting the assad regime. The US supports the UN.....=The UN and the US created ISIS as some secret masterplan.


    There is not any doubt that the policies of the US and the allies created this situation, but this is not some secret master plan controlled by the bilderberg group.....


    Trik makes a lot of great points, but his solution to this and almost every all foreign policy situation, tends to be to advocate for indicriminate bombing(often nuclear) without any considerations to civilians.....I respect him, but I rather not follow his advise when it comes to this topic.

  11. Lack of consent. It doesn't have to be forced. Consent from a minor is not consent. Which makes it statutory rape because she/he is not old enough to consent. 





    I just don't get how this can even be controvercial....If you are ever in a situation where you have to ask "Is this rape", then maybe you should not be in that fucking situation.


    There are a lot of screwed up people in this thread.

  12. They are scaring a lot of people. So as a terror group i'd say they are doing just fine

    Will they succeed with their goal. Nope.


    In the beginning i thought i'd never hate them more than i did

    Then i saw this



    I got really angry when I saw that too....Well, more very sad than angry I suppose, but thats what they were aiming for. They are going to shock and fear! They are hoping to goat us into attacking, and showing our western aggresion once more. Or start showing that we aren't better than they are.




    Way too simplistic. ISIS works a lot more like a gurilla army than a real one. They don't control that red area in the map..:They control some of it, but there is a lot of difference between isis controlled areas and isis attack zones.


    They attack, and withdraw or get pushed back a lot more than they control. They simply doesn't have the man power.

  13. The amount of money spent on terrorism is more to prevent what could happen in the future, not what's happening now.


    If anything is going to cause WW3 right now it's Russia/Ukraine.


    Yes, and that logic is why we can't question it. I get that its to prevent it from happening in the future, but a lot of it gets used on other "crime prevention"...:And the loss of privacy rights is even worse.


    Many, many countries have made terrorism laws after 9/11 and later attacks....In almost all the laws I have read about from different countries use language like "Terrorism and other crimes"....



    The police in my country had the ability to spy on danes without court order, until the end of 2014....Almost all the times they used that ability, were with drug crimes, and other things. Almost none of it was terror related.


    American authorities have had a very hard time about showing documentation from the claimed results....There were loose claims about a lot of foiled attacks but a lot of them have proven to be very weak or outright false.



    I agree that WW3 is a lot more likely to have something to do with russia.....(And russian insecurity and delusions of grandeur)





    they've already attacked France as well as British tourists


    Nope....A few single crazy people who sympatise with this organisation have attack france and now british(And other) tourists.....Criminals kill tourists everyday.


    Stop making them special. You are giving them power.

  14. Nope.....


    They are certaintly not going to cause WW3.....


    If Isis were so strong, they would have launched major attacks against turkey....They don't have anywhere near the manpower or military strengh to come near to that.....


    If they can't beat turkey, they are not going to beat bigger powers...


    Stop being afraid of them, and realise that their goal is panic.


    The number of victims from terror attacks in the west are still nothing compared to everything else in life.....


    But we still panic and spend unreal amounts of money on fighting terrorism.


    I live in a very wealthy but very small country for only 5 million people.


    We have had one major terror attack on our soil. 3 deaths. And we spend shitloads of money on it.


    The flu kills about 1000 people here each year....Pretty sure we don't spend a lot of money on curing the flu.




    Short answer, no.

    Long answer, nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.




    And for the record people, you think it's the coalition airstrikes pushing them back? Not really, It's actually the Pershmerga/kurds. Those guys are amazing.


    Agree! The kurds are a great people....Always appreciated how their identity as kurds came before any religion.

  15. Like what? Earthquakes? I don't think Toshiba is causing those.


    No but the point was that if their accounting can't be trusted, we can't trust very much from them or know how much they spend on improving safety for instance.


    Nobody is saying toshiba causes earthquakes...But toshiba knows earthquakes will happen so will have to build accordingly.

    Interesting, and I agree, but I still think switching over to all integral fast reactors could have prevented it. They don't need high pressure in the coolant loops because they don't use "light water" as coolant (instead they use liquid metal), as well as the coolant system being designed to be capable of continuing to operate via convection in case the coolant pumps fail. Finally, the way they are built in such a way that "an increase in the core temperature will act as a feedback mechanism that decreases the core power", this occurs "naturally" without any external action by operators or mechanisms. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_fast_reactor#Safety


    Although, I can see how a sodium cooled reactor flooding with sea water could pose a problem, as they already had an incident in japan with a sodium cooled reactor. Although that was just a fire and no radiation was leaked. Although there was outrage over a potential coverup. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monju_Nuclear_Power_Plant#Monju_sodium_leak_and_fire


    Still, you are right, we need stronger oversight and frequent inspections.


    Edit: side note, the Monju reactor, as far as I can tell, is not an integral fast reactor, merely a loop type reactor using sodium coolant.


    I agree, but nothing will be safe if we cant trust what they are saying. TEPCO convinced everybody that fukushima was safe, even though it wasnt't

  16. Yea I have a geforce 210 and a Raydon HD 5570 best stuff for troubleshooting as you don't need any PSU connection.

    Besides that I sell the shit out of old hardware.


    Yeah...Just find a very stupid person and change the 1 to a seven, write an x after and sell it as a 270x! You can just convince them that Nvidia makes them as well :P:D

  17. Yep no one at ALL cares about Swift, except you now the stadiums full of screaming fans she gets literally everywhere she goes. oh and the biggest consumer tech company on the planet, cause her actions just forced them to change their policy.


    Just because you don't like her doesn't mean millions (if not billions) of otheres don't.


    You are right, but billions? Im laughing myself sick with that. There are 7 billion people in this world, a huge majority of them are a bit more occupied with just surviving....The 1st world is a pretty small part of the big picture.


    Nobody has billions of fans.