macpro622776

I wouldn't do that. Not exactly necessary anyway.

On our old Surfboard that we got in 2006, you could access the web GUI using 192.168.100.1. Perhaps give it a try?

Load balancing is not the same as what the OP wants. Load balancing spreads the traffic across multiple NICs to prevent high traffic loads from becoming bottlenecked at just one NIC. Essentially it is not possible - the closest you can get is using ForceBindIP as MeshFile mentioned which is a fairly good tool.

I'd say this is more of a modem issue than the router. I'm with Optus cable and there was a period of time when I was experiencing a similar issue. Eventually Optus put in an attenuator for the cable which helped. Perhaps try logging into the modem web UI and see if it has lost the connection there rather than the router the next time you have a disconnection. If so I'd ring up Telstra first to see if they could do anything because if you are to get a replacement modem, you have to get them from the ISP as they aren't sold as retail products in Australia.

There's no such thing as "delayless". Latency is inevitable.

Nothing happens, as with previous USB revisions.

Legally, no. There is a clause somewhere in the OS X User Agreement that states that you must only use OS X on Apple hardware, even if you buy it. But, do what you will...

This does not solve the licensing problem - you still require a separate license for each installation as AlphaGamer46 said.

Actually static IPs are not necessary as computers will assign themselves an IP address. Having said that though, they are nicer to use than the auto-assigned ones.

No, this raises the issue of version control and data duplication. One of the main reasons data storage is centralised is not only to make sharing easier and ensure that the data being accessed won't have conflicting changes, but to centralise backups as well. This makes backing up much easier and quicker, but obviously you must have the correct backup infrastructure set up and running in production, which in the case of LMG, was still a work-in-progress. Imagine if you ran a business with 100 employees, and all of them saved to their own computers as well as multiple servers! Not only would the workflow be tedious and frustrating, but it'd also end up being a mess after a little while.

Not wanting to be a backseat mod (I will be reporting this through the appropriate mechanisms) but this is against the Code of Conduct of the forum. You might want to read through it. Go and buy it.

You probably got the attack because of the .tk domain. I've used them before and although I was never DDOSed, they are horrible to work with. Also they are known for spam bots and alike, hence why the .tk is a likely reason behind the DDOS. I've used both 000webhost (as @burnttoastnice mentioned) and x10hosting and I can testify that x10hosting is a million times better than 000webhost.

Still not quite right. A WAN refers to a number of LANs connected together. A great example of this is the internet. But yes, Wi-Fi = WLAN.

Bear in mind that any sort of internet plan that says "so and so speeds" is only theoretical. You can pop over to Dick Smith or Harvey Norman (etc.) and pickup a modem/router combo, but the modem you have already is very good, so there is no need for another. In terms of speed, you should have a look at how your network is configured. Are you running wireless? What type of Wireless? etc.

There is no guarantee that powerline will be better than wireless since powerline is heavily dependent on the environment it is in (i.e. the way your powerpoints are connected in your house). Wireless is a safer option but you never know until you try.