mfeinstein

Install a new battery to your phone and check if it behaves as the other ones. Maybe a previous version of the OS damaged the battery, with heavy usage, and a new OS version, even if it doesn't use the battery as much, it won't save you, since yours is already damaged.

This is kinda of an eye sore for me, I am that kind of person who can see graphics defects on the smallest of details, so please fix it? The WAN Show logo, the one showed when it's the sponsors time, the one that gets bigger than the others, yeah that one, the center hexagon is not centered in the other hexagons while stroke lines, as you can see in the image attached or here: https://imgur.com/a/UIsK59m (I added red arrows to pinpoint the locations where the edges of the center hexagon don't meet with the outer hexagon lines center). Thank you and keep up with the great job you guys have been doing!

AFAIK, the tattoo was first seen in the last Razer review video. I think it was a joke for die-hard razer fans, but I can be wrong... It would be cool if Linus said something about it, maybe at the WAN show?

Ok Linus, I have a list here of stuff to look for on your "full review" of the OnePlus 5T. I have a OnePlus 5 and those things really are driving me nuts, so if you address it on your video, they will have to listen: The camera has a VERY AGGRESSIVE noise reduction filter. Take a picture, preferentially one with some details, like a piece of wood outdoor in good light, then zoom in the picture, like if you want to edit it later, and look at the details. They all look artificial, like lumps of color, blobs, specially shadows, shadows look like there are tinny black worms around them. I understand they want to address noise, so people stop complaining about the noise camera, but AT LEAST let the users select the noise reduction level they want. Even my Moto X 2nd Gen shoots pictures with more detail, and the Moto X 2nd Gen was known for having a bad camera (in 2014!). RAW mode on the Camera App produces VERY overexposed pictures. The RAW pictures could be a relief for issue #1 (aggressive noise reduction), BUT they also look terrible, they come out too bright and the only way to see them is using a 3rd party app (like Lightroom CC), which is ridiculous, since the stock camera App shoots them, but the stock gallery doesn't display them. Apparently on a previous version they looked pink, and the corrected it to look less terrible (at least I can't see any noise reduction filters). But still, even if they fix the RAW exposure, I will end up with huge DNG files, when I just want small, nice, easy to open and good quality JPGs. The Camera App, shooting in Pro Mode won't let you use the Flash or HDR or HQ. This should be self-explanatory and ridiculous for a Pro-Mode Camera. For a company promoting its product as a high grade camera, they are really lagging behind their marketing promises and I believe you should make it clear for them and specially for future buyers to be aware of it. PS: I have attached one picture as an example and a copy with highlighted parts for you to zoom in and check it for yourself. The overexposed third picture is a copy of the RAW picture, since the original one is 31MB, but it clearly shows my point.