Jump to content

dfg666

Member
  • Posts

    174
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Awards

This user doesn't have any awards

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. To be fair his video title implies that he committed a crime when on his livestream he claims he didn't. So it's a clickbait title that's for sure. If he renamed his video title to "We test out Amazon Go" then it wouldn't attract this much heat. Oh wait Linus can't do that, it wouldn't get as many clicks. lol. Gotta get that extra chicken wings in the freezer somehow right?
  2. lol this adored guy is such an amd fanboy. it's sad. can't take to heart how inferior amd is compared to nvidia and intel.
  3. >Show me the Justice in that We're not talking about prices here. We're talking about raw performance. If you want to talk about prices go stick with a used AMD FX or something.
  4. Going to destroy AMD as usual. At this point AMD might as well just stick to consoles and mobile devices. It's a losing battle in their GPU department every single generation.
  5. Those don't exist. If they did, it's a scam/false advertisement. You mean the Titan Black.
  6. It is an upgrade. Out of the recently released games tested, nfs payback and wolfenstein are the only cases where the gap between the 960 and 780 ti are close. https://imgur.com/a/LKFxL
  7. 8700K. Higher clocks and higher IPC compared to any of AMD's offerings. It can also OC significantly higher (5GHz) than what the Zen architecture can provided you have at least a 240MM rad but 4.5GHz should be easy on a big air cooler eg. NH-D15 https://www.techspot.com/review/1497-intel-core-i7-8700k/page2.html http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/intel_core_i7_8700k_processor_review,11.html
  8. This is one of the many reasons why I went with the 8700K instead even though I only game at 60Hz 1080p. When it comes to gaming in general Intel always pulls ahead regardless if they're optimized or not. Clock speeds and IPC, Intel dominates. Wouldn't matter if it's 5 or 10 years down the line, 8700K would still beat any Ryzen 1st gen in gaming. Nothing you can do much OP unless you can return that CPU+MB for an Intel one.
  9. Just wait since Intel might offer 8 core mainstream desktop CPUs next year. Don't bother with Ryzen since it'll take them 3-5 years to get 5GHz practical OC'd on their Zen architecture. They barely can make past 4GHz. Heck 4GHz+ is top tier silicon lottery.
  10. lmfao at people recommending Ryzen when OP plans to upgrade to 1080 Ti. Don't even buy Ryzen if you can afford a 1080 Ti. You're shooting yourself in the head at this point.
  11. Not sure what programs he uses but I'd go with the 7960X/7980XE instead. High core count, High clock speeds and high overclockability. This ensures you to be able to run those single-threaded editing/transcoding programs like Adobe Premiere (look at how 7820X is faster than 1800X despite have same core/thread count. 7820X has higher clocks) faster than Threadripper due to AMD's latest architecture having an issue past the 4GHz frequency which has an impact on single threaded applications. That PSU is way more than enough on 2 1080 Ti's. But of course overclocking, headroom wise and for the future, it's a good investment. I'm throwing price and power consumption out of the window here considering what he needs.
  12. So you want it to be like the old days where overclocking is this "1337 crew" only thing? For the "big boys".
  13. I'm personally upgrading to an 8700K. I was going for an 1800X but after reading and watching hours and hours worth of reviews. AMD's Ryzen simply has poor IPC compared to Intel's current offerings for my gaming needs. 7700K doesn't have enough threads so 8700K is the sweetspot.
  14. As expected. Fast and destroys AMD. But not in price.
×