Streas test: highest temp vrs average?

[PainBlame]

My core temps average between 65C-75C. At 4.4 ghz and 1.25v.

Which i think is great for this cpu idk yet. (i7 5820k)

 

However, my cores sometimes spike to higher temps

 

So far after 50 mins stress test

Max

83C

78

86

80

87

77

But they stay around 72C generally.

 

Is it bad that they reach a high temp for a sec and than go back down?

Will that degrade my cpu?

i have a cosiar vi100 water pump btw.

 

Also quick question. I installed an m.2 SSD vand Samsung 850 evo, and my computer OS nor Bios can detect it. I found out that the motherboard support does not show support for it, but neither does my Ram and it still works with overclocking.

 

Is there a way for this SSD to work for my computer? Is it possible that in the future with bios update it will work?

[Guest]

what cpu. but the temp looks fine for me.

[GDRRiley]

what mobo is it. some mobos don't support non pcie based drives in m.2

[stationvsbox]

cooler and cpu model? 

[bgibbz]

temps looks fine. Seems right below thermal throttling range (85-95 usually).

[PainBlame]

36 minutes ago, deXxterlab97 said:

what cpu. but the temp looks fine for me.

i7 5820k 6 core

[PainBlame]

26 minutes ago, GDRRiley said:

what mobo is it. some mobos don't support non pcie based drives in m.2

Gygabyte ultra gaming rev 1.0

I saw that it doesnt support it but neither did my ram, however my ram works fine.

[GDRRiley]

1 minute ago, PainBlame said:

Gygabyte ultra gaming rev 1.0

I saw that it doesnt support it but neither did my ram, however my ram works fine.

ram is basicly universal m.2 is not. it will never work 

[meenmeen1103]

15 hours ago, PainBlame said:

Gygabyte ultra gaming rev 1.0

I saw that it doesnt support it but neither did my ram, however my ram works fine.

The ram still uses the same protocol, just at a different freq. That's a much easier compatibility category than a completely different protocol. Your mobo won't support any sata m.2 drives, something like a 950 pro would've worked nicely.

[PainBlame]

On 11/11/2016 at 2:13 PM, meenmeen1103 said:

The ram still uses the same protocol, just at a different freq. That's a much easier compatibility category than a completely different protocol. Your mobo won't support any sata m.2 drives, something like a 950 pro would've worked nicely.

My mobo has a 10 gb/s m.2 slot. It also has an m.2 wireless slot. Their is a support list for m.2 SSDs on their website. However mine is not on the list. Which really sucks cause this cost $150. I would have gotten a sata port 2.5 inch ssd but i didn't want to pack my case unless i had too. I found out my ram is listed in the mobo but it runs at 2400 mghz stock, at 1.2v. Its not till i XMP it to 3200mghz at 1.35v. 

 

Also during a stress test for cpu and RAM. My ram isn't surpassing 1600 mghz. Does anyone know why?

[meenmeen1103]

1 hour ago, PainBlame said:

My mobo has a 10 gb/s m.2 slot. It also has an m.2 wireless slot. Their is a support list for m.2 SSDs on their website. However mine is not on the list. Which really sucks cause this cost $150. I would have gotten a sata port 2.5 inch ssd but i didn't want to pack my case unless i had too. I found out my ram is listed in the mobo but it runs at 2400 mghz stock, at 1.2v. Its not till i XMP it to 3200mghz at 1.35v. 

 

Also during a stress test for cpu and RAM. My ram isn't surpassing 1600 mghz. Does anyone know why?

All the m.2 drives listed are PCIE interface, whereas your drive uses the SATA interface. m.2 is not universally compatible with all m.2 drives because of the interfaces. As far as compatibility lists, for RAM, all modules should use the same interface (DDR3/DDR4) so as long as the modules are of the same interface type, and supported voltage range, they should be compatible even if not on the list but may run at lower or higher frequency depending on settings.

Your RAM is running correctly. Most software reports actual frequency where BIOS will show effective frequency. DDR stands for dual data rate, which basically means a RAM module with an actual frequency of 1600MHz will have an effective 3200MHz.

[PainBlame]

On 11/12/2016 at 10:22 PM, meenmeen1103 said:

All the m.2 drives listed are PCIE interface, whereas your drive uses the SATA interface. m.2 is not universally compatible with all m.2 drives because of the interfaces. As far as compatibility lists, for RAM, all modules should use the same interface (DDR3/DDR4) so as long as the modules are of the same interface type, and supported voltage range, they should be compatible even if not on the list but may run at lower or higher frequency depending on settings.

Your RAM is running correctly. Most software reports actual frequency where BIOS will show effective frequency. DDR stands for dual data rate, which basically means a RAM module with an actual frequency of 1600MHz will have an effective 3200MHz.

That ram makes sense, i didn't even think about 1600 being half of 3200 mhz. Its just bugging me. Thanks