Jump to content

Slightly. But you will still be able to play properly. I would just go with an i5 and a 7790.

Case: 650D CPU: i5 4670K GPU: GTX 770 Gaming @1306MHz Motherboard: MAXIMUS VI Hero PSU: AX760 CPU Cooler: H100i RAM: 8GB Vengeance Pro @1866MHz Storage: 840 250GB SSD / 2TB Seagate Barracuda 7200.14

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/38006-intel-i3-bottleneck/#findComment-488640
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your i3 will bottleneck the card a little, however upgrading to an i5 could combat that.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/38006-intel-i3-bottleneck/#findComment-488654
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tech I don't believe the benchmarks from the first link (didn't look through other ones as they looked to be reviews or something) are correct. I even went and double check and I'm looking at benchmarks on techspot which is a more trusted website and they are using pretty much the same CPU and they reported getting 85fps on average with the 690.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/38006-intel-i3-bottleneck/#findComment-488722
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

BlackOutCrisis, on 21 Jul 2013 - 6:50 PM, said:

Tech I don't believe the benchmarks from the first link (didn't look through other ones as they looked to be reviews or something) are correct. I even went and double check and I'm looking at benchmarks on techspot which is a more trusted website and they are using pretty much the same CPU and they reported getting 85fps on average with the 690.

Ok I'll check it out, chances are TechSpot is not running AA while GameGPU is , that would make a significant difference.

Also please make note that GameGPU is running the 1.02 version of the game, Techspot only tested the release version.

UPDATE: I checked it out, TechSpot did not test a 690 on Far Cry 3, what benchmarks are you looking at ?

Note: I personally don't like techspot, they've done some funny business on Bioshock Infinite to skew the results.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/38006-intel-i3-bottleneck/#findComment-488734
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I'll check it out, chances are TechSpot is not running AA while GameGPU is , that would make a significant difference.

Also please make note that GameGPU is running the 1.02 version of the game, Techspot only tested the release version.

Yea and the benchmarking procedures can be extremely different which could cause that big of a fps gap but I just feel GameGPU are being a tad biased in their benchmarking towards AMD cpu. I'm not a Intel fanboy by any means, the OP's best choice is definitely a fx6300 by far but I just have a really difficult time believe that a 8350 out performs a 3930k and a 6300 out performs a 2600k lol

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/38006-intel-i3-bottleneck/#findComment-488748
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea and the benchmarking procedures can be extremely different which could cause that big of a fps gap but I just feel GameGPU are being a tad biased in their benchmarking towards AMD cpu. I'm not a Intel fanboy by any means, the OP's best choice is definitely a fx6300 by far but I just have a really difficult time believe that a 8350 out performs a 3930k and a 6300 out performs a 2600k lol

I personally don't think that they're being biased, a good example is Far Cry 3 Blood Dragon, graph where they clearly show the intel CPUs outperforming their AMD counbterparts.

Blood Dragon was developed by a different studio than Far Cry 3, this studio perhaps does not have experience optimizing for AMD CPUs.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/38006-intel-i3-bottleneck/#findComment-488902
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally don't think that they're being biased, a good example is Far Cry 3 Blood Dragon, graph where they clearly show the intel CPUs outperforming their AMD counbterparts.

Blood Dragon was developed by a different studio than Far Cry 3, this studio perhaps does not have experience optimizing for AMD CPUs.

I'm not saying that the whole company is AMD biased lol just that one test doesn't seem right. I have never ever seen a benchmark show a 8350 outperform a 3930k and a 6300 outperform a 2600k; In gaming or otherwise.

 

http://www.techspot.com/review/615-far-cry-3-performance/page6.html

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/38006-intel-i3-bottleneck/#findComment-488965
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not saying that the whole company is AMD biased lol just that one test doesn't seem right. I have never ever seen a benchmark show a 8350 outperform a 3930k and a 6300 outperform a 2600k; In gaming or otherwise.

 

http://www.techspot.com/review/615-far-cry-3-performance/page6.html

I've seen this one he didn't test the 690 though so that threw me off when you said 690. Also the tested game build was 1.01 so that might have something to do with it, I know for a fact that the 1.02 patch added game optimizations for AMD systems.

I'm not arguing that an FX 6300 is faster or better than a 2600K, it might however be faster in this particular circumstance for whatever reason.

Remember that a similar situation popped up with Crysis 3, different review sites showed very different results, when the benchmark runs were done in vegetation heavy levels the AMD CPUs came on top and when the benchmark runs were done indoor the intel CPUs came on top, there are too many variables to think about here.

I'm just speculating but possibly parts of the game are more heavily threaded than other parts similar to what we've seen with Crysis 3?

Well in any case both review sites show the FX 6300 outperforming the i3 in both Crysis 3 and Far Cry 3 which is why I recommend it.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/38006-intel-i3-bottleneck/#findComment-489046
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Slightly. But you will still be able to play properly. I would just go with an i5 and a 7790.

god no, the performance difference will be massive, its good in the longer run but thats a massive difference, an fx 6xxx would be a better route.

cpu: intel i5 4670k @ 4.5ghz Ram: G skill ares 2x4gb 2166mhz cl10 Gpu: GTX 680 liquid cooled cpu cooler: Raijintek ereboss Mobo: gigabyte z87x ud5h psu: cm gx650 bronze Case: Zalman Z9 plus


Listen if you care.

Cpu: intel i7 4770k @ 4.2ghz Ram: G skill  ripjaws 2x4gb Gpu: nvidia gtx 970 cpu cooler: akasa venom voodoo Mobo: G1.Sniper Z6 Psu: XFX proseries 650w Case: Zalman H1

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/38006-intel-i3-bottleneck/#findComment-489078
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×