Jump to content

Hello,

 

Is there a noticeable performance difference between the Xfce and Cinnamon editions of Linux Mint? Especially on a slow computer with 1gb of ram and an old n455 Atom processor?

 

Thanks in advance.

"Normandy" i7 4790K - GTX 970 - Phantom 410 (Gun metal) - Z97 Extreme4 (asrock) - 128GB Crucial SSD - 1TB WD HDD - H60 Refurb. - 7 case fans | G710+ Keyboard, G230 Headset, Acer GN246HL Monitor.

Quick thoughts on system: I7 is extremely quick and I'm glad I spent the extra for hyper-threading. I regret my decision to get the GTX 970, it has horrible coil whine. There isn't any excuse for this terrible whine I and others are having. I HIGHLY recommend a 144hz monitor. Future Improvements/upgrades: Rubber fan mounts, basic speakers, more ram (for a total of 16gb), replace GPU.

144hz is love. 144hz is life. I like to submit unfinished posts then do about 20 edits. I like the Night Theme too.
Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/344085-xfce-vs-cinnamon-performance-linux-mint/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive always liked xfce better for its simplicity on my netbook.

if faster than ubuntu's desktop and runs smoother.

I was on a n240 atom 1.66ghz dual core. and let me tell you windows 7 ran like i had the hard drive sitting on a electromagnet.  

put xubuntu on it and it was off to the races.. 

stuck with peppermint os for a while that was good too

i5 4440 8gb ram zotac750

one big bag of dicks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×