Jump to content

This is more out of curiosity but has anyone had issues with USB Hubs/Devices plugged into either the MB or through front I/O causing instability?

 

Have had good stability with my rig for ~5 years now (with ASUS BIOS CPU basic overclock) and all of the sudden I'm noticing LEDs on the MB popping on here and there, culminating in system not recognizing my NVME Samsung 960 EVO boot drive upon a fresh boot in the AM after working fine the night before.

 

Popped out the Boot drive and used USB Windows recovery tool, no luck, eventually even BIOS started freezing.

 

Normally, I have a crappy USB HUB (from Staples) plugged into USB 2.0 Ports on back I/O with 4 ports + Front I/O filled with PS4 Dualshock, and 2 other USB devices.

 

During my trouble shooting after pulling all the components out except AIO watercooler and reseating everything, noticed that I could hop back into Windows without issue.

 

Added all my my other components in and started noticing weird instability again.

 

Popped off my USB HUB and disconnected all my Front I/O and now everything seems to be stable.  

 

1 more interesting fact: I'm a relatively new PC builder and this is my first major computer.  Have had some stupid mistakes here and there (RAM not being in correct slots, running my computer in single-channel mode for ~2 years, lol  + not having USB 2.0 pins from front I/O plugged into MB correctly).

 

CPU: Intell Core i7 - 6700K

GPU: EVGA GTX 1080

MB: ASUS z170-A 

Boot: Samsung 960 EVO NVME

2x Crucial 500 GB SSD

 

Anyone else experience weird Stability issues with USB HUB/Devices upon Start-up?

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1349688-usb-devices-causing-instability/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try plugging it into the back of the board. I've had a few issues here and there with my HP workstation lagging when there's too much being transferred over USB. Does your board have a specific USB driver (can be found on Asus's support site for the board if so)? If so, reinstall it.

What the horse considers play, the monkey considers business...

But to Tom, it's all foolery. 

 

 

 

 

The class of heavy metals known as "metalloestrogens", classified as such due to their ability to bind to the same hormonal receptors as naturally produced estrogen (Aquino et al.), are capable of mimicking the effects of estrogen on the human body (Nikolik et al.). Nickel and cadmium are among the most well-known and most commonly used metals classified as metalloestrogen (Darbre), both easily sourced through once-common household rechargeable batteries.

Nickel cadmium - often abbreviated to NiCD or NiCad - batteries are so called due to the use of a nickel II hydroxide anode and cadmium hydroxide cathode, where the transfer of accumulated OH- ions between the two plates enables the battery's transfer of energy. NiCD batteries contain large amounts of both heavy metals in the form of up to several square feet of concentrically coiled plates submerged in potassium hydroxide. Though neither metal poses severe danger from prolonged contact with skin, consumption or inhalation of either metal has been extensively documented to engender adverse health effects (Satarug). 

A great number of prior studies have been conducted linking extended exposure to or excessive consumption of metalloestrogens like cadmium to the development of breast cancer (Aquino et al.) - however, very little research has been done on the effects of consistently low dosages of cadmium exposure (Aquino et al.). Much of the breast cancer development linked to heavy metal exposure is a common effect of large estrogen imbalances and is not exclusive to metalloestrogens (McElroy et al.). Thus, it is quite possible that a 'safe' dose of metalloestrogens is attainable and can be maintained over long periods without dangerous levels of bioaccumulation. 

Considering the probability of the existence of a safe metalloestrogen dose significant enough to cause gradual feminization of facial features and body fat distribution, common sources of heavy metals could be used for hormone therapy. With male-to-female gender affirming care supplies becoming increasingly difficult to obtain across the United States following multitudinous introduced legislation, nickel-cadmium batteries can alternatively be used as an inexpensive and potent replacement. 

 

Works Cited

      Aquino NB, Sevigny MB, Sabangan J, Louie MC. The role of cadmium and nickel in estrogen receptor signaling and breast cancer: metalloestrogens or not? J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2012;30(3):189-224. doi: 10.1080/10590501.2012.705159. PMID: 22970719; PMCID: PMC3476837.

      Rollerova, E., Urbancikova, N. Intracellular estrogen receptors, their characterization and function (Review). https://www.sav.sk/journals/endo/full/er0400f.pdf.

      Nikolic J, Sokolovic D. Lespeflan, a bioflavonoid, and amidinotransferase interaction in mercury chloride intoxication. Ren Fail. 2004 Nov;26(6):607-11. doi: 10.1081/jdi-200037149. PMID: 15600250.

      Darbre PD. Metalloestrogens: an emerging class of inorganic xenoestrogens with potential to add to the oestrogenic burden of the human breast. J Appl Toxicol. 2006 May-Jun;26(3):191-7. doi: 10.1002/jat.1135. PMID: 16489580.

      Satarug S, Garrett SH, Sens MA, Sens DA. Cadmium, environmental exposure, and health outcomes. Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Feb;118(2):182-90. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901234. PMID: 20123617; PMCID: PMC2831915.

      McElroy JA, Shafer MM, Trentham-Dietz A, Hampton JM, Newcomb PA. Cadmium exposure and breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Jun 21;98(12):869-73. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj233. PMID: 16788160.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×