Jump to content
3 minutes ago, LukeSavenije said:

the most overpriced line on z390, hero code and formula have the vrms worse than a z390 UD

less phases doesn't mean its worse. The non-Aorus Gigabyte Z390 boards use 10 phases of our old friend, onsemi 4C10 + 4C06. I dont think a proper 16 phase can make these do better than the 8 phases worth of SiC639 in 4 phase mode.

 

4 minutes ago, LukeSavenije said:

that's not the problem... it should be allowed to do a little higher, but turn off when reaching a certain point

 

spoiler: it doesn't

I dont think 2700 + 2080 can draw enough power to need triggering OCP or OPP either, that's 500w max of sustained load?

 

Just now, LukeSavenije said:

i know, but inside the budget it's really nice to have

 

and with a vii you truely have something special and powerful

didnt Premiere Pro do worse with OpenCL comparing to CUDA? 

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jurrunio said:

less phases doesn't mean its worse. The non-Aorus Gigabyte Z390 boards use 10 phases of our old friend, onsemi 4C10 + 4C06. I dont think a proper 16 phase can make these do better than the 8 phases worth of SiC639 in 4 phase mode.

touche

 

4 minutes ago, Jurrunio said:

dont think 2700 + 2080 can draw enough power to need triggering OCP or OPP either, that's 500w max of sustained load?

about, tho I'd never recommend it, especially since the peak power of the 2080 can actually overload it

 

4 minutes ago, Jurrunio said:

didnt Premiere Pro do worse with OpenCL comparing to CUDA? 

ow wow... it had a bigger effect than i thought it would...

Link to post
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, jerubedo said:

OK I have 2 options for you, and I'll explain the advantages of both below (because if I were in this position I'm not sure which one I'd go with. Since I'm more of a gamer than an editor I'd probably go with the more gaming oriented choice).

 

First:

 

 

Second:

 
So the first build is going to do slightly better in video editing, even in Premiere Pro.

 

The second build will do slightly worse in Premiere Pro, but MUCH better in other Adobe applications like Photoshop or Aftereffects and in gaming.

 

The second build is nearly $300 more, and for that extra $300 you're really only getting a few extra FPS (when paired with the 2060. HOWEVER if you upgrade to a more powerful GPU later, the performance differential will be even bigger) and a big boost in other Adobe applications. So if it's worth that to you, then go with that. Otherwise the 2700x build is the better value proposition.

Thanks for your reply, but I have decided from previous experience to stay away from Amd cpus, Gpus and gigabyte MBs.

 

If I go with your intel build above but opt out the gpu and mb with Asus prime Z390-a and keep everything else. Is that good? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jason1987 said:

Thanks for your reply, but I have decided from previous experience to stay away from Amd cpus, Gpus and gigabyte MBs.

 

If I go with your intel build above but opt out the gpu and mb with Asus prime Z390-a and keep everything else. Is that good? 

Yes. The only thing I will say is that on the Z390 chipset, Gigabyte is currently the industry leader at all price points for VRM quality and number of phases. That being said, the choice is ultimately yours :)

 

As for opting out of the GPU, that one is an Nvidia from Zotac. Which one were you thinking?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jerubedo said:

Yes. The only thing I will say is that on the Z390 chipset, Gigabyte is currently the industry leader at all price points for VRM quality and number of phases at every single price point. That being said, the choice is ultimately yours :)

 

As for opting out of the GPU, that one is an Nvidia from Zotac. Which one were you thinking?

 

I was thinking of just staying with the rtx 2070 by Asus..

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jurrunio said:

it's not overkill, just heavy Asus tax. Same reason to put the Z390-A option down.

 

Cooler-wise, if you go with the paste 8700k then the 280mm rad Corsair H110i (and variants), EVGA CLC280, NZXT X62 as the costly but RGB alternative. The soldered 9700k can do with worse coolers like the Dark Rock Pro 4, though of course there's upper limit of better cooling as far as daily use of an 8700k or 9700k goes.

 

As for PSU

750w is as much as you need for a single GPU system considering 9900k + 2080ti draw up to 600w. This system atm wont draw more than 450w no matter what.

 

Premiere pro is heavy on the CPU. For a pure editing system even 9900k + 2060 makes sense.

 

might as well go air cooling like the Cryorig H7 Quad Lumi or Deepcool Gammaxx GT at that point, small AIOs perform far from what the price suggests

 

Even B450 boards do better

 

Not even a good price + will go past its output rating at times

The second build was his original that was made as a price comparison for the build that I was suggesting. Also the reason I went for that motherboard because I was only looking at X470 for some reason not even thinking about B450 boards and I was also looking for an ample amount of USB ports that could then be used for any external storage devices or anything else OP needed to use USB for. The PSU in the end was more of a cost saving measure and PCPartPicker's Power Draw calculator said it should draw around 339 Watts. So this would be the new build I'd suggest based off of what I've seen for replies

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hotseff said:

The second build was his original that was made as a price comparison for the build that I was suggesting.

uhm, I'm not the one talking about the second build

 

2 hours ago, Hotseff said:
2 hours ago, Hotseff said:

These two are already criticized before

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×