Matteo Pignoli

A lot of these things can be played on Steam Deck, and you can dock that sucker for display, usb ports and more making a nice convertible solution at a fantastic price. I'd imagine that if you'd like to stick to the Apple Ecosystem, a Deck would be a cheap way to get entry into the games you want without breaking the bank. Aya Neo also has a new device coming out that also wouldn't break the bank of your budget but would still play the games you listed. Otherwise, something like the Asus G14 would be a good choice if you're looking for something that feels as good as what you're familiar with, but packs the punch that you want for your games. I know you didn't mention handhelds, but I do think there's something to be said for saving quite a bit of cash and getting something that can be a companion, not a replacement. Hope I was helpful!

EDIT: If you want to know what or how well the deck specifically does, check out Proton DB. I've been playing my own flavor of fighting game, JoJo's All Star Battle R on it and have been having a great time.

Thanks! Really excited to be part of the team!

The PS4 Jailbreak video was my first credited video, but the first video I wrote (well, co-wrote since much of it was based on Linus' impressions) was the Louis Vuitton Earbuds Review!

These kinds of videos are the very, very best way to introduce newer LMG employees to the audience. 
Hi Adam! Nice yo see you on board, I liked quite a lot of the videos you wrote (I think the Linux on PS4 was the first one you wrote?), and hope to see you more often. Keep up the good work

These kinds of videos are the very, very best way to introduce newer LMG employees to the audience. 
Hi Adam! Nice yo see you on board, I liked quite a lot of the videos you wrote (I think the Linux on PS4 was the first one you wrote?), and hope to see you more often. Keep up the good work

I've been following all of the team's channels for quite a long while, several years at this point.
 
All the different channels had their distinct identity, in the way that they were shot and scripted.
So... Why did this change? I was watching a Techquickie video, and I didn't realize it was a Techquickie video. Because the white chromakey'd background is long gone, basically only the use of stock photos has remained. 
It was shot in the "Shortcircuit set", if we want to call it that way. Several LTT videos were set in that same filming location in the studio, and I really don't get why.
Why did the production of the videos started to use sets (That I suppose were created with certain channels and videos in mind) as "general purpose sets that we can use for every channel"
 
Basicaly the only channel that is still consistent in it's filming style and set is TechLinked, but I think that the reason TechLinked is so "unchanging" is due to the nature of the production of the videos, that need to be done quickly, more than identity and such.
 
How does all fo this not create any problem in the form of brand identity of the channels and/or the content created?
I get that the vast majority of the audience between the channels is shared, so it shouldn't be that big of an issue as maybe this post is trying to make it out to be, but I think that different channels exist to be different to one another, and this "amalgamation" of content is... Really strange to me.
 
I hope to get an answer, since I'm really curious! I hope I didn't sound pedantic, I was just curious. Thank to everyone who'll read this in advance!
 
((Also, I'm not really used to the forum, so I hope I posted this topic in the accurate place))

Yea, it seems the most likely answer, given the start of construction and the first Techquickie video shot on the "Shortcircuit set"

I've been following all of the team's channels for quite a long while, several years at this point.
 
All the different channels had their distinct identity, in the way that they were shot and scripted.
So... Why did this change? I was watching a Techquickie video, and I didn't realize it was a Techquickie video. Because the white chromakey'd background is long gone, basically only the use of stock photos has remained. 
It was shot in the "Shortcircuit set", if we want to call it that way. Several LTT videos were set in that same filming location in the studio, and I really don't get why.
Why did the production of the videos started to use sets (That I suppose were created with certain channels and videos in mind) as "general purpose sets that we can use for every channel"
 
Basicaly the only channel that is still consistent in it's filming style and set is TechLinked, but I think that the reason TechLinked is so "unchanging" is due to the nature of the production of the videos, that need to be done quickly, more than identity and such.
 
How does all fo this not create any problem in the form of brand identity of the channels and/or the content created?
I get that the vast majority of the audience between the channels is shared, so it shouldn't be that big of an issue as maybe this post is trying to make it out to be, but I think that different channels exist to be different to one another, and this "amalgamation" of content is... Really strange to me.
 
I hope to get an answer, since I'm really curious! I hope I didn't sound pedantic, I was just curious. Thank to everyone who'll read this in advance!
 
((Also, I'm not really used to the forum, so I hope I posted this topic in the accurate place))

I've been following all of the team's channels for quite a long while, several years at this point.
 
All the different channels had their distinct identity, in the way that they were shot and scripted.
So... Why did this change? I was watching a Techquickie video, and I didn't realize it was a Techquickie video. Because the white chromakey'd background is long gone, basically only the use of stock photos has remained. 
It was shot in the "Shortcircuit set", if we want to call it that way. Several LTT videos were set in that same filming location in the studio, and I really don't get why.
Why did the production of the videos started to use sets (That I suppose were created with certain channels and videos in mind) as "general purpose sets that we can use for every channel"
 
Basicaly the only channel that is still consistent in it's filming style and set is TechLinked, but I think that the reason TechLinked is so "unchanging" is due to the nature of the production of the videos, that need to be done quickly, more than identity and such.
 
How does all fo this not create any problem in the form of brand identity of the channels and/or the content created?
I get that the vast majority of the audience between the channels is shared, so it shouldn't be that big of an issue as maybe this post is trying to make it out to be, but I think that different channels exist to be different to one another, and this "amalgamation" of content is... Really strange to me.
 
I hope to get an answer, since I'm really curious! I hope I didn't sound pedantic, I was just curious. Thank to everyone who'll read this in advance!
 
((Also, I'm not really used to the forum, so I hope I posted this topic in the accurate place))

I've been following all of the team's channels for quite a long while, several years at this point.
 
All the different channels had their distinct identity, in the way that they were shot and scripted.
So... Why did this change? I was watching a Techquickie video, and I didn't realize it was a Techquickie video. Because the white chromakey'd background is long gone, basically only the use of stock photos has remained. 
It was shot in the "Shortcircuit set", if we want to call it that way. Several LTT videos were set in that same filming location in the studio, and I really don't get why.
Why did the production of the videos started to use sets (That I suppose were created with certain channels and videos in mind) as "general purpose sets that we can use for every channel"
 
Basicaly the only channel that is still consistent in it's filming style and set is TechLinked, but I think that the reason TechLinked is so "unchanging" is due to the nature of the production of the videos, that need to be done quickly, more than identity and such.
 
How does all fo this not create any problem in the form of brand identity of the channels and/or the content created?
I get that the vast majority of the audience between the channels is shared, so it shouldn't be that big of an issue as maybe this post is trying to make it out to be, but I think that different channels exist to be different to one another, and this "amalgamation" of content is... Really strange to me.
 
I hope to get an answer, since I'm really curious! I hope I didn't sound pedantic, I was just curious. Thank to everyone who'll read this in advance!
 
((Also, I'm not really used to the forum, so I hope I posted this topic in the accurate place))