Jump to content

asdasdfasdf

Member
  • Posts

    93
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Funny
    asdasdfasdf got a reaction from Radium_Angel in This GPU is WIRELESS?!   
    Sorry but you say God's name in vain so many times that I had to turn it off. Lately I heard you guys saying God's name in vain constantly so I'm going to have to discontinue watching you. I'm just saying this for feedback. Sorry guys. Interesting video but I can't watch.
  2. Like
    asdasdfasdf reacted to igormp in Which is better performing RAM config, 16GB+8GB, or 8GB+8GB?   
    It's related to the CPU, and all of modern Intel CPUs support flex mode: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/000005657/boards-and-kits.html#flex
  3. Like
    asdasdfasdf reacted to YoungBlade in Which is better performing RAM config, 16GB+8GB, or 8GB+8GB?   
    If you exceed the 16GB capacity, then the 24GB config would be faster, even if it defaulted to single-channel rather than the hybrid channel mode that some systems are capable of these days (where it runs in dual-channel mode until you max out the smaller stick). However, if it does default to single-channel with 24GB then the 16GB config will be faster in any workload where you don't touch the page file by exceeding 16GB.
     
    However, since you're already using single-channel RAM, you wouldn't notice a performance regression at least, because the worst case scenario is that you end up with the same RAM bandwidth as you have right now, just with boosted capacity, as if you had a single 24GB stick.
     
    Of course, all of this assumes that the sticks actually work and don't have a compatibility issue with the RAM currently installed.
×