marmalade

I hope you're joking about the reasons you think the anti-RGB video got slated. I hope it's bait, it's definitely bait. Some people disliked that you ruined working stuff, but mostly I think people were insulted with sloppy writing, poor jokes that were repeated multiple times, and the general non-content nature of the video. Doing a cheesy bit or two in a video is par for the course for the channel, and in limited quantities it works, but that video is a shining example of way too far. It's insulting that you thought the audience would respond well to it. Think Mighty Number 9 saying "like an anime fan on prom night", it's that level of insulting. Other videos that took it too far in my mind include the one where you took a desktop on a camping trip and covered it in camo netting, and the 10 minute advert masquerading as a toast goof. I know humour is subjective but man. It would be helpful if you labelled non-content as such in the title, the same goes for ads (I know all your vids have ads and sponsored hardware etc, but I mean at least the toaster vid should have had #ad in the title). This video was better. I don't give a toss about RGB, but I watched it for the build porn, even if the build itself was nothing special. The intro was only mildly triggering, and I only had to skip 2 minutes of ads. B- I registered on this forum specifically to say my piece about the anti-RGB video weeks ago. Take it how you want, but I'm coming from the place of being a fan, pointing out what I see as mistakes in the hope that you minimise them in the future.

Not a quickie suggestion but a normal video. 64 cores: Ryzen 7 vs 1950x vs Epyc. I want to see 64 core (probably) Beowulf clusters of Ryzen 7 and 1950X go up against 2x EPYC 7601, bonus points for a rig of whatever makes sense from intel. Price/performance analysis, benchmarks, workloads that run the gamut from embarrassingly parallel to requiring very tight linkage between cores, the works. Actually, better make it a series I'd watch the hell out of that.

It wouldn't surprise me if it's just a proxy way to vent about the negativity surrounding the anti-RGB video (and the other non-content videos in a similar vein). I didn't expect an acknowledgement about recent negativity (if anything maybe just a "we'll do better next time" quote), but as they brought up the recent negative reception of some of their content (in the latest WAN show), the anti-RGB negativity was conspicuous in its absence.