A few thoughts after looking at new laptops announced in CES:
Please stop putting 8950HK into thin and light chassis. It won't surpass the multi core performance of 8750H due to thermals. Even though it has extra 3MB cache and more single core performance, the i9 chip is much more expensive (chip alone: $583 vs $395). Not worth it.
Also, 2070MQ 80W and 2080MQ 80W are probably just slightly better than 2060 80W. Kinda reminds me of what happened to 1080MQ. Higher end GPU means higher MSRP. Therefore, you pay more.
Stop asking for more money from consumers without providing any noticeable extra performance.
-
@D13H4RD share your thoughts
-
@AluminiumTech CFL-H is still new
9th gen with same, old 14nm architecture...putting 8 cores on mobile chip = fire hazard
-
@Jurrunio problem is, there are way too many 2070MQ and 2080MQ (both 80W, same with 2060N) in many new laptops. Feel like they are trying to charge more for a slight bump in performance
-
Agree with the 8950HK in a smol chassis. The TDP runaway at turbo is pretty damn high and if you set a hard power limit, it ends up being only ever so slightly better than an 8750H in terms of overall performance.
We'll have to wait for the performance numbers on the 2070 and 2080 in their Max-Q configurations before I can give a proper stance, though
-
@D13H4RD considering that 1080MQ doesn't end well before, I don't have high hopes on 2070MQ and 2080MQ