agent_x007

Trust me, older chipset don't support that. Here's AMDs Socket 939 under Win 7 x64 (with and without Memory Hole) :

Are You seriously using Haswell platform to "simulate" what over 12 years old motherboard does ? FYI : On old platforms, without Remap/Memory Hole enabled, BIOS itself can't adress more than 3GB of memory. So, regardless of what OS you use, everything above ~3GB mark is locked. Example of board without/Disabled Memory Remap :

Only for certain servers/motherboards.

Benchmark: Superposition 1080p Extreme CPU: Xeon E5-1680 v2 GPU: GTX 580 3GB GPU Core: 772 MHz GPU Memory: 1,002 MHz Score: 980 Benchmark: Superposition 4k Optimised CPU: Xeon E5-1680 v2 GPU: GTX 580 3GB GPU Core: 772 MHz GPU Memory: 1,002 MHz Score: 1 543 Benchmark: Superposition 8k Optimised CPU: Xeon E5-1680 v2 GPU: GTX 580 3GB GPU Core: 772 MHz GPU Memory: 1,002 MHz Score: 150

Out curiosity : Are those modules Dual Sided or Single Sided ? As others pointed out, it's probably Memory Remap (or lack of it that is the cause). If you pull two sticks, does 2,75GB limit remain unchanged ? You could try decreasing memory frequency (because it is possible memory itself isn't stable).

Rufus takes what you point out. Did you use x86 Windows 7 ? Again : What MB you got ?

It's your PC, if you want to go for it - do it MB ?

Pretty sure you can't boot NTFS under/as UEFI... What Motherboard you got ?

Yes. It simply "takes care" of boot sector modification by 3-rd party software (or viruses). If you don't plan on installing viruses that modify boot sector (or BIOS/UEFI), you should be fine without it Also, there is an option of enabling it again after Windows 7 is installed... I think ?

Yes ? I don't think Secure boot will allow Windows 7 to modify boot list from Win 10 so that Win7 can add itself as boot option. I might be wrong here though...

Use not-modified one.

Yes. That should do it. Remember to boot it as "UEFI" and NOT Legacy/CSM.

(U)EFI boot requires GPT type OS drive, which requires USB installation with GPT support. Try creating windows 7 SP1 installation pendrive in Rufus with EFI/GPT option ticked.

Try balanced.

Windows Power Plan = Balanced ?

Did you plug in 6-pin/8-pin ? Also, Is slot "@ x16 3.0" speed ? Last option is trying DDU (DisplayDriverUninstaler) and different driver.

Anyone updating those scores ? Benchmark: Sky Diver CPU: Xeon E5-1680 v2 GPU: GTX Titan X GPU Core: 1,178 MHz GPU Memory: 1,753 MHz Score: 41 927 3DMark Link: https://www.3dmark.com/sd/5428218 Benchmark: Fire Strike 1.1 CPU: Xeon E5-1680 v2 GPU: GTX Titan X GPU Core: 1,178 MHz GPU Memory: 1,753 MHzz Score: 15 888 3DMark Link: https://www.3dmark.com/fs/18058912 Benchmark: Fire Strike Extreme 1.1 CPU: Xeon E5-1680 v2 GPU: GTX Titan X GPU Core: 1,178 MHz GPU Memory: 1,753 MHz Score: 7 882 3DMark Link: https://www.3dmark.com/fs/18058839 Benchmark: Fire Strike Ultra 1.1 CPU: Xeon E5-1680 v2 GPU: GTX Titan X GPU Core: 1,178 MHz GPU Memory: 1,753 MHz Score: 4 261 3DMark Link: https://www.3dmark.com/fs/18058766 Benchmark: Time Spy 1.0 CPU: Xeon E5-1680 v2 GPU: GTX Titan X GPU Core: 1,178 MHz GPU Memory: 1,753 MHz Score: 5 765 3DMark Link: https://www.3dmark.com/spy/5970438 Benchmark: Time Spy Extreme 1.0 CPU: Xeon E5-1680 v2 GPU: GTX Titan X GPU Core: 1,178 MHz GPU Memory: 1,753 MHz Score: 2 707 3DMark Link: https://www.3dmark.com/spy/5970354

I would like to request my scores to be added into Average FPS leaderboard (Valley). I moded my vBIOS so it never goes above 1178MHz and 1,068V on GPU. Pretty good at keeping TDP/power under 250W Benchmark: Valley Basic (720p) CPU: Xeon E5-1680 v2 GPU: GTX Titan X (Maxwell) GPU Core: 1,178 MHz GPU Memory: 1,753 MHz Average FPS: 135.7 Score: 5 679 Screenshot : Benchmark: Valley Extreme HD (1080p) CPU: Xeon E5-1680 v2 GPU: GTX Titan X (Maxwell) GPU Core: 1,178 MHz GPU Memory: 1,753 MHz Average FPS: 91.8 Score: 3 842 Screenshot : Benchmark: Valley 1440p (2560x1440) CPU: Xeon E5-1680 v2 GPU: GTX Titan X (Maxwell) GPU Core: 1,178 MHz GPU Memory: 1,753 MHz Average FPS: 56.6 Score: 2 368 Screenshot : Benchmark: Valley 1600p (2560x1600) CPU: Xeon E5-1680 v2 GPU: GTX Titan X (Maxwell) GPU Core: 1,178 MHz GPU Memory: 1,753 MHz Average FPS: 51.8 Score: 2 165 Screenshot : Benchmark: Valley 4k CPU: Xeon E5-1680 v2 GPU: GTX Titan X (Maxwell) GPU Core: 1,178 MHz GPU Memory: 1,753 MHz Average FPS: 26.3 Score: 1 101 Screenshot : Benchmark: Superposition 1080p Extreme CPU: Xeon E5-1680 v2 GPU: GTX Titan X (Maxwell) GPU Core: 1,178 MHz GPU Memory: 1,753 MHz Score: 3 483 Average FPS: 26.05 Screenshot : Benchmark: Superposition 4k Optimised CPU: Xeon E5-1680 v2 GPU: GTX Titan X (Maxwell) GPU Core: 1,178 MHz GPU Memory: 1,753 MHz Score: 5 474 Average FPS: 40.95 Screenshot : Benchmark: Superposition 8k Optimised CPU: Xeon E5-1680 v2 GPU: GTX Titan X (Maxwell) GPU Core: 1,178 MHz GPU Memory: 1,753 MHz Score: 2 435 Average FPS: 18.22 Screenshot :

Fact checking : Just so you know, Queen test uses/stresses INT units, not FPUs. Since FPU = SSE/AVX/etc, this test really doesn't show how far newest CPUs have got.

You can't do that in DSR (it's dumb that way). DSR doesn't do "nice" resolutions (or ratio adjustment), only "multipliers" with .01 accuracy (like 1.33, 2x, 3x, etc.). The only way to do FullHD 16:9 with DSR on 16:10/21:9 panel is doing Downsampling (switching off DSR), and manually entering "Custom Resolution" with refresh etc.

You can use GTX 1080 for 4k to NOT have perf. drop on your current CPU. However, even that might not get you to 100% GPU usage in all places (if you care about it). Game should be playable on your CPU regardless of resolution in that case.

Haswell-E no longer in LGA 2011 (-1) ! We should celebrate ! Thank you.

DisplayPort 1.3 update for Maxwell : https://www.nvidia.com/object/nv-uefi-update-x64.html

@Topanico Uncore Ratio / UCLK Frequency / Uncore & QPI Frequency -> Uncore Frequency / NB Frequency (in CPU-z) / "QPI/DRAM Frequency".

We don't know, game wasn't tested enough yet.