Sunako

I can get one of the 3700x’s I have to run 4.6 all core at 1.35 v but heat on avx in r20 even overpowers the cooling I have for it. No blue screens just a error in r20 itself At 1.4 v I am maxing that chip at 4.75 all core. As for the cooling for that set it is 2 xspc rx rads and photon d5 combo and ek velocity cpu block. There are also 2 980 ti’s on that loop.

Comcast screwing with me today so ended up playing around a bit. not sure where a 3700 should be sitting any feed back would be great.

no one is getting screwed if they increase core counts. if a person bought a 6 core at the time it is what they could afford and met their needs. Just because there is a large leap forward and people that bought something in the past and something Better comes out does not mean that people are geting screwed or ripped off.

I have already posted on the ruling from the Supreme Court from 1990 it is constitutionally legal. There are just stipulations that the checkpoints must be made public 24 hours ahead of its opening.

You are correct that they can not just pull any one over. But when it is a check point it is publicly safety and every one is checked it is legal. As long as they check every one and and not picking and choosing who to check it is legal. You will find at check points they will have other officers or cones at turns leading up to the check point. Those that try and avoid have given cause for the police to believe the person is trying to avoid an invounter. You will encounter similar check points in some states that require imissions equipment on the car. All are legal as long as you are not picking and choosing which vehicles to inspect unless they would have imissions in this case.

You have In alienableriggts that all peoples are entitled to and rights granted to you by the rule of law. You are arguing all rights are dictated by morality but they are not. Many rights are granted or revoked based on the safety or wellbeing of the collective. It might not be morally right to put a person in prison for life but for the safety of other it is. This is based in law. So you have a romantic view of rights and mortality which you need to be able to disconnect the two to make and informed decision.

Ok so you want to say every thing is a right? You do not have the right to drive. You are permitted to use a car with a valid drivers license in which you agree to submit to a breath, blood, urine test if requested by a officer of the law for that jurisdiction if the driver of any mechanical vehicle. A passenger is free to refuse. This is the law not a right. Second is you do not have the right to use a vehicle on a public road unless said vehicle is registered with the dmv for one of the 50 states or the District of Columbia. All others are allowed travel permission only when passing thru a legal port of entry. There is no rights involved here only established rule of law. I’m sorry you can’t disconnect your feeling from what has been deemed lawful. You are free to lobby to have these laws changed at your own expense.

I don’t believe it is a moral argument here. It is what is lawful and what is not. You have the mind set that people that have done something wrong lose all right. When the government that this pertains to has come to the conclusion that even people that have done wrong still have rights and that law enforcement must follow their own rules as well.

As a note to my above post a sobriety test does not include a field sobriety test that is only a tool for officers to read the person. Sobriety test are breath, blood, and urine.

The other thing that I have seen some people argue that the stops are unconstitutional. They are as long as they have been posted ahead of time. Every car is checked verbally meaning showing a note or license through the window Is not enough and give the officers reason to further detain the person. And all states have a clause when you receive a drivers license That you will submit to a sobriety test or lose the right to the license and are there for in voilation of the law and can be jailed for not submitting.

The NYPD will most certainly lose as police are alrdy required to post sobriety check points publicly at least 24 hours ahead of time. https://guardianinterlock.com/blog/police-announce-checkpoints/

Majority of states give pedestrians the right of way over cars when crossing a road when leaving from on corner a buss stop or if there is no cross walk within 800 feet but only to cross from one side to the other in a safe fashion even across a highway. You can not stop on the road way unless it is for your own safety. I legally cross a highway several times a month with no cross walk on pacific coast highway in pagination beach California as for others calling cyclist pedestrians they are motorist in most states and must boat all traffic laws. If using a cross walk for your bike you must walk it instead of ride it. The only restriction for bikes on most roads is meeting the minimum speed for the high way. If unless otherwise posted no bike shall travel on a highway unless it is the only route between two places.

Hot dog + dounut with cream and egg data exchange very satisfying

jay's video in that both listed the card in Dmitry's hands as a 1080 not as unreleased so maybe he just misspoke. https://youtu.be/6jlBJBjRWHY