Jump to content
7 hours ago, JoostinOnline said:

If you expected them to be accurate then you're gullible.

Obviously I didn't expect them to be accurate, but I did not expect it to be this disproportional. I've always liked Intel, although they're pricey, but even if it was just for publicity, it just bothers me a little. 

PC: CPU: i5-9600k - CPU Cooler: be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 - GPU: Sapphire Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB GDDR6 - Motherboard: ASRock - Z370 Extreme4 - RAM: Team - T-Force Delta RGB 16 GB DDR4-3000 - PSU: Corsair - TXM Gold 550 W 80+ Gold Certified Semi-Modular ATX Power Supply - Case: Thermaltake - Core G21 TG

Link to post
Share on other sites

Arrogance in my opinion or stupidity that they didn't check the benchmarks also before the press got them. I don't think there is too much to be upset over as no one should trust commisioned testing anyway, all companies will do this and not one of them is special. Don't pre-order, don't trust facts or figures from them and for gods sake dont keep buying overpriced hardware just for a name brand in your PC.

My Current Build: https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/list/36jXwh

 

CPU: AMD - Ryzen 5 3600X | CPU Cooler: Corsair H150i PRO XT | Motherboard: Asus - STRIX X370-F GAMING | RAM: G.SKILL Trident Z RGB 2x8Gb DDR4 @3000MHz | GPU: Gigabyte - GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11 GB AORUS XTREME Video Card | Storage: Samsung - 860 EVO 250GB M.2-2280 - Sandisk SSD 240GB - Sandisk SSD 1TB - WD Blue 4TB| PSU: Corsair RM (2019) 850 W 80+ Gold Certified Fully Modular ATX Power Supply | Case: Corsair - Corsair Obsidian 500D RGB SE ATX Mid Tower Case | System Fans: Corsair - ML120 PRO RGB 47.3 CFM 120mm x 4 & Corsair - ML140 PRO RGB 55.4 CFM 140mm x 2 | Display: Samsung KS9000 |Keyboard: Logitech - G613 | Mouse: Logitech - G703 | Operating System: Windows 10 Pro

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/13/2018 at 7:49 PM, lmeneses said:

 Why did Intel think it was a good idea to lie about benchmarks? Did they not think the pc community would figure it out lol. I've never favored Intel or AMD over the other, but this makes me frown upon Intel. 

Intel didnt perform the benchmarks. They hired a 3rd party to do it. As to why the 3rd party did what they did, who knows. Could they be a bit incompetent when it comes to running gaming benchmarks? Possibly. Could it be that Intel hired them and PT intentionally did things to skew results so intel might hire them again in the future? Possibly. Could intel have directed them to run tests a certain way? Possibly. The point is, Intel didnt do the tests and as to why PT did what they did, who knows for sure. It's all speculation, as is knowing where to exactly place the blame for this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×