Pc part list

[Davidthesaiyan]

Budget (including currency): 2000

Country:  US 

Games, programs or workloads that it will be used for: I’d like to run 150-200 fps on most games , will be using photoshop, ai etc heavily! 

 

 

[Why_Me]

PCPartPicker Part List

CPU: *AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D 4.2 GHz 8-Core Processor  ($391.95 @ Amazon) 
CPU Cooler: *ID-COOLING FROZN A620 PRO SE 58 CFM CPU Cooler  ($29.99 @ Amazon) 
Motherboard: *MSI PRO B650-S WIFI ATX AM5 Motherboard  ($143.44 @ Amazon) 
Memory: *Silicon Power Value Gaming 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) DDR5-6000 CL30 Memory  ($92.97 @ Amazon) 
Storage: *Silicon Power UD90 2 TB M.2-2280 PCIe 4.0 X4 NVME Solid State Drive  ($102.97 @ B&H) 
Video Card: *Zotac GAMING Trinity GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 16 GB Video Card  ($769.99 @ Newegg) 
Case: *Montech AIR 903 BASE ATX Mid Tower Case  ($65.00 @ B&H) 
Power Supply: *be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W 80+ Gold Certified Fully Modular ATX Power Supply  ($99.90 @ Newegg) 
Operating System: *Microsoft Windows 11 Home OEM - DVD 64-bit  ($119.99 @ Amazon) 
Monitor: *MSI MAG 275QF 27.0" 2560 x 1440 180 Hz Monitor  ($189.00 @ Amazon) 
Total: $2005.20
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
*Lowest price parts chosen from parametric criteria
Generated by PCPartPicker 2024-07-09 13:50 EDT-0400

[Guest]

https://pcpartpicker.com/list/Nyqnz6 

This should be a pretty good system for gaming and workstation purposes. 13900K has a ton of cores so i'd recommend it for productivity. Gaming it's within a couple percent of the fastest chips so you'll be fine there too. Especially with DDR5-7200 which nobody recommends for some reason despite helping performance a ton for like $20 more (Edit: they're priced about the same actually).

[LinusIsTuff]

13 minutes ago, rippy4500 said:

https://pcpartpicker.com/list/Nyqnz6 

This should be a pretty good system for gaming and workstation purposes. 13900K has a ton of cores so i'd recommend it for productivity. Gaming it's within a couple percent of the fastest chips so you'll be fine there too. Especially with DDR5-7200 which nobody recommends for some reason despite helping performance a ton for like $20 more (Edit: they're priced about the same actually).

The 13900k? Over a 7950x3d or a 7800x3d? And an AMD gpu for ai? What a world. 
 

sarcasm over, amd is generally better in the ai department due to théir avx512 capabilities (and are better watt for watt… and performance per dollar…). They do, however, suck at ai on gpus. I think why_me’s is probably the better choice, but a 4080s is in the budget with a cheaper psu and no windows liscense( if that doesn’t fit a peerless assassin over an aio)

[Guest]

Just now, Linuswasright said:

The 13900k? Over a 7950x3d or a 7800x3d? And an AMD gpu for gaming? What a world. 
 

sarcasm over, amd is generally better in the ai department due to théir avx512 capabilities (and are better watt for watt… and performance per dollar…). They do, however, suck at ai on gpus. I think why_me’s is probably the better choice, but a 4080s is in the budget with a cheaper psu and no windows liscense( if that doesn’t fit a peerless assassin over an aio)

13900K will be faster than a 7800X3D in multithreaded, and a 7950X3D would have been more expensive than either.

Maybe 4070 Ti super would be better, thought 7900 XT was better but looking into it now I guess that's wrong. But im not sure you can fit a 4080 super into the budget.

[ArushM]

19 minutes ago, rippy4500 said:

This should be a pretty good system for gaming and workstation purposes. 13900K has a ton of cores so i'd recommend it for productivity. Gaming it's within a couple percent of the fastest chips so you'll be fine there too. Especially with DDR5-7200 which nobody recommends for some reason despite helping performance a ton for like $20 more (Edit: they're priced about the same actually).

Maybe not the 13900K its so hot its not even viable for most people. AMD high end with more cache would be better

https://pcpartpicker.com/list/mDhp6D

[ArushM]

4 minutes ago, rippy4500 said:

13900K will be faster than a 7800X3D in multithreaded, and a 7950X3D would have been more expensive than either.

Maybe 4070 Ti super would be better, thought 7900 XT was better but looking into it now I guess that's wrong. But im not sure you can fit a 4080 super into the budget.

Yeah sure but whats the use if it runs at 4.5 GHZ cause its throttling that badly, and AMD for AI and ML tasks isnt great, I speak from experience here

[LinusIsTuff]

1 hour ago, rippy4500 said:

13900K will be faster than a 7800X3D in multithreaded, and a 7950X3D would have been more expensive than either.

Maybe 4070 Ti super would be better, thought 7900 XT was better but looking into it now I guess that's wrong. But im not sure you can fit a 4080 super into the budget.

4080super + 7900x. 7800x3d if for more gaming. In budget with a worse monitor. Better gpu >cpu for gaming and ai.
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/9qMNt7

Also… it’s gaming and workstation. 7950x3d is jack of all trades, master of none (still better than a master of one). It fits with a 4070 ti super 

[ArushM]

43 minutes ago, Linuswasright said:

4080super + 7900x. 7800x3d if for more gaming. In budget with a worse monitor. Better gpu >cpu for gaming and ai.
https://pcpartpicker.com/list/9qMNt7

Also… it’s gaming and workstation. 7950x3d is jack of all trades, master of none (still better than a master of one). It fits with a 4070 ti super 

Just beacuse something is marketed for gaming doesn't mean that it doesn't have productivity applications, for example Nvidia GPUs. Same thing applies for the X3D chips. Get a more powerful GPU for AI.

[LinusIsTuff]

43 minutes ago, ArushM said:

Just beacuse something is marketed for gaming doesn't mean that it doesn't have productivity applications, for example Nvidia GPUs. Same thing applies for the X3D chips. Get a more powerful GPU for AI.

A more powerful gpu. At 2000$. For ai. A 4090 costs 1900$. If you shank someone for it. Are you trolling?

 

also; x3d -> unstable. They’re feats of mankind, pillars to gaming, but they’re specific. They are gaming chips, since you have to murder the clock speeds. The only one that’s ok at both for the price range is 7950x3d (and it’s kinda bad at the price range, it’s just good enough at both to justify). You have to go one way over the other at a price range.

[ArushM]

2 hours ago, Linuswasright said:

A more powerful gpu. At 2000$. For ai. A 4090 costs 1900$. If you shank someone for it. Are you trolling?

 

also; x3d -> unstable. They’re feats of mankind, pillars to gaming, but they’re specific. They are gaming chips, since you have to murder the clock speeds. The only one that’s ok at both for the price range is 7950x3d (and it’s kinda bad at the price range, it’s just good enough at both to justify). You have to go one way over the other at a price range.

I was talking abt the 4070 ti super

The instability is non-existent after a BIOS update and choosing the right, approved RAM

[LinusIsTuff]

1 hour ago, ArushM said:

I was talking abt the 4070 ti super

The instability is non-existent after a BIOS update and choosing the right, approved RAM

It’s unstable at higher clocks due to the nature of x3d. That’s why they run at lower clocks, and are worse at productivity. 

[LinusIsTuff]

1 hour ago, ArushM said:

I was talking abt the 4070 ti super

The instability is non-existent after a BIOS update and choosing the right, approved RAM

You know what? This set me off.

I met Anton kiriwas (think I misspelled his name). He’s a nasa engineer or whatever now, but when he was younger he worked on how to get the cache to not implode when smt (in like core 2 duo days)

 

he explained why x3d is a pain real simple (and I paraphrase):
What I did, but twice as hard, and twice as complex

x3d is a miracle. But it’s not perfect.