Jump to content

The first one is faster (3600 vs 3200) and has the same latency as the other one (CL18@3600 is equivalent to CL16@3200, 10 nanoseconds)

 

☆edit: Depending on the CPU, two sticks is also easier for the memory controller to run. It may not be able to overclock to 3200 with four sticks.

Remember to either quote or @mention others, so they are notified of your reply

Link to post
Share on other sites

i7-7700

Z270 Asrock mobo

4x8GB Avexir (Hynix mystery die single rank) 2800Mhz 15-15-15-38 1.35v

 

2800Mhz 13-15-15-28 vs. 3200 Mhz 17-19-19-38?

I also managed to get it to 3333Mhz stable on 1.4 volts and 19-21-21-38, but I suspect that config is inferior.

 

True latency is lower on the 2800Mhz but RAM is also meant to move bytes, not just access addresses quickly, so I'm not sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

according to ram cl calculator 2800 cl13 is better than 3200 cl17, of course 3333 cl19 is the worst one

 

for gaming lower latency is better than more bandwith, for example dual channel is better than quad channel because quad has higher latency but a server dont need extremly low latency so for a server quad or eight channel is better

 

just try a game benchmark with different ram settings, i squeeze few extra fps moving from 1600mhz cl11 to cl10 and then to cl9 (i have ddr3)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×