vslavov

Is that a real tattoo?

Would you be able to stretch it to $200? If not then this one would work: 
https://www.amazon.com/Sony-MDRXB650BT-Extra-Bluetooth-Headphones/dp/B01BY7ZMXC/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&qid=1485798910&sr=8-6&keywords=Sony+wireless
 
If you are able to stretch it then I would recommend these ones: 
https://www.amazon.com/Sony-MDRXB950BT-Extra-Bluetooth-Headphones/dp/B00MCHE38O/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1485799008&sr=8-1&keywords=Sony+wireless

I was thinking of silver ones. Too many crappy headsets by razer... if you can't get the modmic then I would suggest the blue snowball and the superlux 611b's. That'll be a great little starter set up. If you want better sound quality than that. Adding a xonar dg(x) will greatly improve your sound over onboard.

Just like AMD did with BF4 and Tomb Raider......

No

Ubisoft wanted Nvidia's tech. That tech also happens to come with direct help from Nvidia. Ubi licensed the tech like PhysX and all the other Games Workshop features and Nvidia helps them implement that stuff into the game. That is what the Games Workshop program does. I don't see how they would restrict AMD from seeing the game because that is all up to Ubi like the Nvidia representative said. Nvidia is just selling something to a company for them to use and help them out (it's actually quite a good system). If AMD didn't get the game or they just overlooked it well that is their fault. Besides it's not like Games Workshop has given AMD a disadvantage because Nvidia cards perform worse on Watch Dogs so there is hardly a problem (Nvidia cards have higher frame rate btu they stutter more). If Nvidia cards performed fine with the game and there were no problems with those cards but AMD's ran liek they do nwo then I would say there is a problem but I think it is pretty obvious that Ubi just didn't optimize their game for either platform and probably didn't take on Nvidia's advice and help on properly either.