wo0t

IMG announced its new PowerVR GPU architecture with 7.8 GRay/s. That would be 26 times faster than the PowerVR GR6500 and would eliminate the need for raster and hybrid rendering. As a dual GPU card (like the Caustic R2500) and/or multi-GPU system RT performance could be increased even further.
 
"This video highlights the new features and benefits of the IMG DXT GPU using a real-time in-house developed demo. IMG DXT aims to bring ray tracing to the mass market by enabling high visual quality using limited ray budgets."
 
Whitepaper:
https://resources.imaginationtech.com/hubfs/gated-files/raytracing/powervr-photon-whitepaper-en-jan23.pdf
 
"Scalable to desktop and data centre (up to 9TFLOPS FP32 and over 7.8GRay/s)"
https://www.imaginationtech.com/news/imagination-launches-the-most-advanced-ray-tracing-gpu/
 

In some benchmarks a 3950x at 65W(like the 2700 in the Acer Predator) is 2x faster than a 2700x. It's 7nm.
https://hothardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-9-3950x-zen-2-review?page=4

LTT and some other reviewers have been fooled by default OC BIOS (~10% more performance with all core turbo and +1Ghz L3 cache) for reviewers. Only by overclocking a 8700K can reach >1500 in Cinebench.
 
LTT should make that transparent (for example with YT annotations in the 8700K review and/or a new video)  and not let Asus/Intel get away with covert OC reviews. Otherwise LTT would let Asus/Intel harm its credibility and encourage even more cheating in the future. Also LTT should check clock speeds and BIOS settings next time to detect this kind of cheating in the future.

https://www.pugetsystems.com/blog/2017/10/07/Why-Do-Hardware-Reviewers-Get-Different-Benchmark-Results-1058/

LTT and some other reviewers have been fooled by default OC BIOS (~10% more performance with all core turbo and +1Ghz L3 cache) for reviewers. Only by overclocking a 8700K can reach >1500 in Cinebench.
 
LTT should make that transparent (for example with YT annotations in the 8700K review and/or a new video)  and not let Asus/Intel get away with covert OC reviews. Otherwise LTT would let Asus/Intel harm its credibility and encourage even more cheating in the future. Also LTT should check clock speeds and BIOS settings next time to detect this kind of cheating in the future.

https://www.pugetsystems.com/blog/2017/10/07/Why-Do-Hardware-Reviewers-Get-Different-Benchmark-Results-1058/

LTT and some other reviewers have been fooled by default OC BIOS (~10% more performance with all core turbo and +1Ghz L3 cache) for reviewers. Only by overclocking a 8700K can reach >1500 in Cinebench.
 
LTT should make that transparent (for example with YT annotations in the 8700K review and/or a new video)  and not let Asus/Intel get away with covert OC reviews. Otherwise LTT would let Asus/Intel harm its credibility and encourage even more cheating in the future. Also LTT should check clock speeds and BIOS settings next time to detect this kind of cheating in the future.

https://www.pugetsystems.com/blog/2017/10/07/Why-Do-Hardware-Reviewers-Get-Different-Benchmark-Results-1058/