Aaaaand here lies the problem. "Victim of abuse". You have just opened a can of worms, because there are thousands of people that believe that 90% of this abuse is fabricated, or is self inflicted to get attention. Not to mention you called her a feminist, which will also anger the real feminists that spend their time fighting for equality, rather than complaining about sexist video games.
I am probably a terrible person for saying the following sentence, but here goes nothing.
Online bullying is a sham. Someone being mean to you online is not bullying. There are some extreme cases where internet bullying is real (posting very private, intimate pictures of someone, or releasing their physical location alongside death threats) but telling someone they are stupid, or their cause is unjust, does not constitute internet bullying.
Now, I know that I myself have also just opened up Pandora's Box, but it's hard to disprove it. A lot of the doxxing done to some of these radical "feminists"(anti-male crusaders) have yet to be proven. Even when federal agents get involved, they find no such occurrence.
I genuinely do not care about what twitter does to censor people, because I don't have any social media accounts, nor would I care even if i did. Companies shoot themselves in the foot all the time, and this is no different. The problem with this very specific circumstance is the huge conflict of interest that has been introduced. We have a professional victim, now in a position to determine what is right or wrong on a social media platform. Not just that, but someone with their own agenda to push too, meaning a potential chance to abuse this position.
